PROOF ATHEISTS DELIBERATELY REJECT GOD
By: Robert T. Lee
A fundamental principle of God's creation is: The total amount of matter and
energy in God's creation always remains the same. Matter and energy cannot be
created or destroyed by any of God's creatures or by any part of His creation.
The principle we cited in the above paragraph is known and embraced by atheistic
science. It is fundamental to what scientists know about chemical reactions. Man
has tried to create and destroy matter, but he is only able to effect chemical
changes or reactions. After effecting the chemical reactions the atoms God created
are preserved. This preservation of the atoms has been labeled as the
"Conservation of Mass Law." Since the atoms are preserved during and after the
chemical reactions, the products of the reactions are none other than chemical
equations.
So we are going to argue science are we? Now I am not an expert in this field of science (and obviously neither is Mr Lee) but I love a challenge :)
By the way, the REAL Law of Conservation of Energy states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, but can change its form.
The total quantity of matter and energy available in the universe is a fixed amount and never any more or less.
My point in making mention of these facts is to show that atheistic scientists and the
so-called "learned upper class" understand the "Conservation of Mass Law." But
they refuse to perceive its obvious ramifications about the existence Of God. For
example:
1. Matter cannot be created by any thing, any creature nor by any rational
creature. That fact eliminates every part of God creation as having the ability to
create matter. Principle #1: No part of God's creation can create.
Jumping logic AGAIN! NNnngghhh!!! God is not mentioned anywhere in this law. Don't jump to conclusions. But I'll let him continue...
2. After eliminating every part of God's creation, including the most powerful and
intelligent creatures as being unable to create, we may ask if matter can bring itself
into being from its own nonexistence. But by asking that question, we find that we
are asking a very insane question, because that which does not exist cannot create
since there is nothing in existence to bring anything into existence. A fundamental
principle of creation that atheists have never learned is that in order for matter to be
brought into being, its creator must already be in existence. An existence of some
type must already be in existence in order to give existence to a thing which has no
existence. Principle #2: When there's nothing in existence, nothing can be brought
into existence. Why is it necessary for a layman to expain this fact to scientists?
Now how about this for a theory, who says the universe is a closed system anyway? Such like the goldfish who thinks the world is only his bowl. Since we have no way of knowing what happened before the big bang it is hardly scientific to speculate. Once again, the lack of an answer does not mean there is a god.
3. Therefore it is right to conclude that God existed before any other thing existed,
and He therefore created all matter and everything else that exists. (Proverbs
3:19-20). Those who foolishly deny that fact can but foolishly attribute matter's
existence to that which they clearly know could not have created it. But that is
exactly what atheists do. Therefore it is clear to see that atheism is a deliberate
denial of the existence of God - a refusal to admit His existence even in the midst
of overwhelming proof of His existence.
I believe the term here is 'non sequitur' This is where a conclusion is drawn from premises which are not logically connected with it.
What could be constituted as proof is if I saw an atom with the words 'Made in Heaven' written in a corner. :)
As we stated earlier, matter also cannot be destroyed by any part of God's
creation. So how could matter, which DID NOT exist at some point, give itself
existence, and in addition, an indestructible existence, while that which DOES exist
(God's creation) cannot give existence to matter and cannot destroy it? This is
giving that which had no existence power to create itself while in its nonexistent
state , while that which DOES exist and does have power does not have the
power to create matter and does not have the power to destroy it. Thus we clearly
perceive how utterly ludicrous is atheism in is denial of God.
I truly feel like giving up on this. I could bark back, "How can something that DOES NOT EXIST (God) create SOMETHING THAT DOES EXIST! (matter)" It would be pointless and sinking to an intellectual low.
Principle #3: God is the One who created matter (Genesis 1:1), and He's the only
One who can destroy it (2 Peter 3:10-11).
Yeah, and apparently the earth was created in 4004BC, is the centre of the universe along with many other biblical absurdities. The bible cannot be used as a scientific foundation.
However despite this their are still many christian scientists in the world. (Around 40% was one such quoted figure) It is important to remember that they do not (often) jump to such illogical conclusions to support their faith.
Every time a christian comes up with a scientific proof of God it has *always* been proven wrong. Most of the times these proofs will stem from misquoting scientific facts. I would suggest that you visit talkorigins.org as they cover both sides of the argument in a far better way than I have managed.
BACK
I would like to make it clear that all texts by Mr Lee are not altered in any way to make my claims any stronger. Spelling mistakes are as they were in the originals. And the intellectual copyright for each article remains with Mr Lee