My Inept-Confiscation Incident by the Force, may be quite Similar to these Unfortunate Friends

The SPYder Web News


Radioman--
PLEASE POST AS FAR AND WIDELY AS POSSIBLE!!

The feds are trying to get Preston Nichols put away on insanity charges!
Several months ago, Mr. X., whose communications to me regarding his having been trained as a mind controlled gov't agent you published earlier this year, connected with and became friendly with Nichols in NY. About a month ago Mr. X, whom I refer to as "Mr Coffee" in my report, was on a LI cable talk show in which he totally spilled major beans about his past--as to involvement in/victimization by government mind control programming and such. The next day he says feds tried to off him.

Not long after this Mr. X he was arrested at his home in NJ by local cops who were there to confiscate his legal handgun by court order, due to a formal complaint against X having been filed by a suspiciously vengeful ex-girlfriend (as in she was put up to it by FBI).
Though exhibiting complete compliance with all the officers' requests, some pretext was used as an excuse to indicate that X had been abusive and uncooperative with the cops and he was arrested. Mr. X was then immediately remanded to a gov't mental institution from which he has spent several weeks trying to extricate himself. So far he is out of the bin but the presiding judge has not yet closed the case.

Now a similar thing is being tried on Nichols.
Preston hasn't been arrested yet as far as I know. The feds are moving in--trying a "John Ford" on him--using confiscated materials to bolster their attempt to have him declared legally insane. It's unbelievable. Some people in the gov't must be very scared. Interestingly, the as yet unidentified agents/officers who invaded both Nichols' home on LI as well as some rural property he owns in Pennsylvania were from New Jersey I don't believe they can make it stick with Nichols but they could really cause him a serious pain in the ass.

I have not talked to him as of this stuff happening and don't know what if any kind of formal charges are being leveled at him. Agents are "gathering evidence" from his properties under what is apparently a federal warrant--as agents have crossed state lines in enforcing it, and I guess they can take that "evidence" to some paid-off judge and get an order remanding Nichols to a gov't psychiatric facility. Of course someone or some (covert) government agency instigated this, to get Preston out of circulation.

I would say this shows that the entire Montauk Project issue and related issues (such as other MK operations, HAARP, Fight 800, etc.) have become a major concern to certain powers that be at this time. Considering Preston's not-inconsiderable clout with certain "Constitutionalist" elements of the government--in particular the military, whoever is behind this shit is definitely pretty powerful--and/or wacko.

John Quinn



More on Preston Nichols — Ellie Crystal, Wed Oct 7 19:02

On this NOTE, I would like the local incident of the Nintendo Killers to be carefully evaluated as another similar example to the poor 11 year kid who faced the death squad for getting a BBgun for a birthday present!

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 12:00:46 -0600
From: "Trigger Mortis" <alan__harper@hotmail.com>
Subject: the Nintendo Caper

>RCMP Const. Marina Wilks said that the police erred on the side of caution
>and acted in "good faith" considering the information they had at the time.

>"We had no history with the residence and we weren't sure what we were
>dealing with. We acted as best we could on the information that we had. Now
>we can say that there wasn't an issue."

>She admitted that the four young men never posed a threat to the community.

=============

That's what the RCMP call "good faith" now. They admit they have no evidence
of improper behaviour on the part of a citizen and they shove a sub-machine
gun in your face.

That's an arrogant attitude which I find unacceptable.

================

>Upon seeing both his sons being taken into custody, Lorne said that he
>began yelling at the officers to identify who they were.

>"I'm screaming at these cops that they've got the wrong boys, they've got
>no police records, and this officer turns around, a gun's pointed in my
>direction and he starts screaming at me to back off."

==============

Here's something else that annoys me. The police are wearing their Robocop
outfits with no ID visible and with faces concealed. The father has a
legitimate concern that these jerks have their identities concealed rather
than openly identifying themselves as police officers.

Murderers and thieves conceal themselves. Police, who are presumably not
murderers or thieves, should not be concealing their identities. Obviously,
they are doing so to avoid accountability later. They not only attempt to
avoid any accountability through actions at the scene, but plan in advance
to do so.

Next, they point a gun at the father when he demands that they identify
themselves. That is a criminal offense in itself. It is called "pointing a
firearm". Pointing a firearm at any person is a criminal offense, unless the
person pointing it feels that his life, or the life of a person under
his/her protection, is in danger. So, this cop thought that his life was in
danger because dad was asking for identification??

============

>"I went outside with (my friend), locked up the door, I walk around the
>corner and I see (my friend) holding his hands up and all of a sudden I
>hear this voice saying, 'Freeze!' The guns weren't in our face but every
>gun was drawn with fingers on triggers."

==============

The only time a finger should be on the trigger is when a person WANTS the
gun to fire. Otherwise, it should be outside the trigger guard and straight
as an arrow alongside the frame. The reason for that is that any surprise or
shock, such as someone bumping into you or a loud noise may cause your
trigger finger to make a slight convulsion and fire the gun (remember that
the gun is deployed, or should only be deployed, in a high stress situation,
where the officer feels that life is threatened by the behaviour of the
perpetrator). The way to avoid that is to train yourself to ALWAYS have the
trigger finger outside the trigger guard and ALWAYS keep the trigger finger
straight and unbending. After a while, it becomes second nature and you
don't need to think about it. When you want the gun to fire, you make a
conscious decision to unbend the finger, place it inside the trigger guard
and press the trigger.

Likewise, the gun should never be pointed gratuitously at the citizens. That
is why "pointing a firearm" is a crime under the criminal code.

It looks like the RCMP in BC are sorely lacking in training. They seem to
enjoy the intimidation factor of waving their guns around at the citizens,
without employing proven safety procedures.

Even though the force doesn't feel that safety of the citizens has enough
importance to be addressed, the individual officers should have enough
integrity to become thoroughly familiar with their equipment, especially
equipment which can project lethal force to a distance.

Unfortunately, shit flows downhill and, if the boss doesn't care, why should
the guy on the street doing the job?

This whole affair is a nice example of the contempt that government holds
for the citizenry. They don't mind spending money on expensive equipment to
intimidate people, but save money by not providing funds for professional
training.

That's the way I see it.

Bye. Al.

SI VIS PACEM, PARA BELLUM

[ Previous 5 Sites | Skip Previous | Previous | Next | Skip Next | Next 5 Sites | Random Site | List Sites ]

Citizens Of America Radio Ads - Running Now

Center for the Prevention of Handgun Violence

Second Amendment Sisters, Inc.

HandGun Crime Prevention

Sane Gun Laws

Every day, we see stories of gun violence on our television screens. Here's the other side of the story--a few of the many cases in which citizens used firearms to defend themselves and others during the month of February, 2001.

On February 3, Cherese Belin returned to her Charleston, South Carolina apartment to find jewelry and money missing. She called police, who determined that a thief had entered the home by removing an air conditioner from the bedroom window. Police searched the apartment, but failed to find the intruder. After investigators left, Belin asked her neighbor, Shermaine D. Whitley, to search the house a second time. Arming himself with a handgun, Whitley peered beneath the homeowner's bed and found the burglar hiding there. He ordered the man to come out. Instead, the thief fired two shots at Whitley, striking him in the leg. The armed neighbor then returned fire, killing the burglar. Whitley will not be charged. "The suspect fired first, and the victim returned fire," a police spokesman said. "He was defending himself."

Lisa Liev, owner of Johnny's Cut Rate Liquor in Dallas, was working the afternoon shift on February 9 when a man entered the store. He pulled a gun and demanded money. Liev dove to the floor and grabbed her own pistol from beneath the cash register. As the man jumped the counter, she shot him. Liev then ran outside and locked the robber inside the store before calling police. Still wearing a bandage on her head from a previous robbery attempt, she said, "I'm lucky to be alive. This is the second time they try and rob and hit me." The robber died at the scene, and police ruled the shooting justifiable homicide.

On February 12, a fourteen-year-old boy was alone in his Dayton, Ohio home when he heard someone breaking out a window in the back bedroom. The teenager yelled for the intruder to leave, then ran to his father's bedroom and armed himself with a shotgun. "He told the person not to come through the window, to back out, and that didn't happen," a police spokesman said.

The teenager then loaded the gun and fired. A few minutes later, police found a man riddled with buckshot wandering the neighborhood. He was arrested. The fourteen-year-old was not expected to be charged.

On February 14, three members of a Suffolk, New York rock band fought back when two armed invaders kicked in the front door of their home and attempted to rob them. Two of the band members grabbed shotguns. The first intruder had enough sense to flee when he saw the armed homeowners. Wesley Jones did not--he was killed with a shotgun blast as he held a gun to the head of the third resident. Investigators stated that the shooting appeared to be justified.

On February 17, three men forced their way into an upscale Atlanta home. One intruder pushed the homeowner's mother into a back bedroom while his accomplices pistol-whipped her son. A police spokesperson said, "Two males were on top of him, kicking and beating him." When the assailants attempted to remove his coat, the homeowner broke free and retrieved a handgun. He opened fire, killing one of the invaders, later identified as Nedrick Taylor. The resident was not charged.

At about 2 a.m., February 18, Jose Antonio Herrera and Rodrigo Castaneda burst through the door of an apartment near Three Points, in Tucson, Arizona. The assailants used duct tape and "tie wraps" to bind the two female occupants. As the intruders ransacked the house, eighteen-year-old Amelia Gamboa broke free and ran to her bedroom. She retrieved a pistol from beneath her mattress and confronted Castoneda. When he pointed a rifle at her, she shot and killed him. Herrera was charged with first-degree murder.
Gamboa was not charged.

On February 19, Kyung Choi and his wife Sung let two customers into their Chicago jewelry store. Almost immediately, one of the men pulled a handgun and shot Sung Choi in the left shoulder. Kyung grabbed a shotgun and fired a single shot at the robbers who quickly fled.

On February 20, Rhonda Darlene Hand was in the kitchen of her Nashville home when she heard someone open her unlocked back door. Anthony Ray Krantz, holding a handgun, entered the kitchen, but was met by Hand who had armed herself. Police believe Krantz fired one shot at her, and Hand fired five shots at the invader. Krantz, who police peculated was there to rob Hand, died at the scene. Hand was not charged.

Other self-defense stories that occurred during the month of February include a stepson in Houston who shot and killed his step-father as the angry man attacked his estranged wife; the Pikeville, Kentucky storeowner who shot it out with two armed robbers and drove them from his business; and the Homosassa, Florida homeowner who used a shotgun to capture two of five burglars who had broken into his home.

None of these accounts were reported by the mainstream media.

Robert A. Waters is author of The Best Defense: True Stories of Intended Victims Who Defended Themselves with Firearms, Cumberland House Publishing, Inc., 1998.

An Internet Publication for Real Americans © 2000 SierraTimes.com - All rights Reserved

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

Is the media interested in enlightening the public about the true facts of gun use by criminals and the positive sides of gun use by responsible gun owners? Of course not!

Journalists and the news media in general are intellectual prostitutes for the powers that be. They think lying for the powers that be will bring them more personal advantages and benefits than adhering to the truth. In the short run they might be right - in the long run they will pave the road for their own destruction as well as ours. Today's journalists and media are some of the most irresponsible individuals and corporations supporting, and even advocating, crime with the lies they present as truth.

If they would report the truth about gun use more people would keep their guns and fewer criminals would use guns to commit their crimes. That, of course, could not be tolerated by the criminal organizations known as governments, who, in turn, are controlled by the United Nations, the most corrupt and diabolical organization ever concocted by human minds.

In order for the United Nations to gain its utopian vision of world rule all firearms have to be eliminated from the hands of all individuals. Gun control with eventual gun confiscation is a United Nations effort. Our treasonous governments working to enslave the citizens of their countries are the willing mercenaries for these devious United Nations posing as a peace organization.

Folks, learn the truth and be not afraid to stand for it and by it. This will be of the greatest importance in the near future not only for yourself but also for your country.


Fred Kyburz

Have a great day!

RCMP Enforcements:

The RCMPolice and Edmonton city police appear to have launched a pre-emptive
strike against the Firearms Community since Easter!

First on Good Friday last , Peter Kearns, a very well known Member of the Firearms Community and a former Firearms Dealer, is attacked on Highway 2 South , near Carstairs with a phoney alcohol road block and story about a "suspected white truck wanted in a homicide investigation in Edmonton. At this moment in time I drove past that roadblock in a white truck and was not even given a second look!

Now two more strikes are carried out , one on a Local Firearms Dealer , Lock & Load where a seizure of Firearms was made because the "cards" could not be produced. In todays Edmonton journal the Minister of justice is quoted as saying the Amnesty is declared partly to protect the inventory of Firearms Dealers. The CFO has never issued the cards , obviously!

A third strike was carried out by RCMPolice in Fort Saskatchewan , this time on the home of the Honorable Peter Kearns where materials and his computer were seized!

An unusual situation exists in these raids, for there is no press release etc as is the normal practice of the Police after carrying out a successful raid on CRIMINALS! An interesting fact in itself , I think, and leaves me wondering why they don't want the press to know?

Gordon Hitchen

Last Note 10-26-01 proved that the set-up amongst other things, was done by some very shady Gov't dissidents, as Bob reports here:

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 17:44:17 -0600
From: "Bob Lickacz" <firearms@planet.eon.net>
Subject: PONYBOYS

In regards to the legal exploits of Das Kriminalen Kearns, I'm surprised to hear that the ponyboys' star witness is Paul Almassy.

Mr. Almassy, from what I understand is 75 years old. Mr. Almassy, from what I understand has spent 34 of those 75 years in the Crowbar Hotel, as a guest of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth ll.

I further understand that Mr. Almassy, was just recently sentenced to 7 additional years at the same hotel. (He must get one Hell of a rate for being such a loyal guest. You'd also think the old fart should retire at this stage of the game.) I heard a rumour that the original sentence for Mr. Almassy was going to be 10 years.

Hmmmmmmmmmm.

You don't think that Mr. Almassy fabricated a story involving Das Kriminalen Kearns just to get a lower sentence. You don't think that would happen, do you? You don't think that the Hate-On that the CCRA has for Das Kriminalen, has anything to do with the latest go 'round, do you? I must confess that my poor gun owner's brain (according to the government it is either infantile or psychopathic) is getting damn sore just trying to keep things straight.

In Edmonton there is a trial that is currently going on regarding a hapless fellow by the name of Jason Dix. If you remember back a few years ago, a couple of guys were found dead at a local paper packaging plant. The Ponyboys investigated the scene and proclaimed that the two dead guys had been electrocuted. The coroner's report differed slightly from the Ponyboys conclusion in the minor detail that both dead guys had been shot in the head. Three times each, no less.

The Ponyboys it seems had a similar Hate-On for Mr. Dix as they appear to have for Das Kriminalen Kearns. They apparently decided that Mr. Dix was their man and proceeded accordingly. Mr. Dix spent two years in the slammer, after which the Crown dropped all charges because of LACK OF EVIDENCE.

In this civil trial where Mr. Dix is claiming $14.6 million in damages, we are being treated almost daily to expert witness after expert witness, soundly condemning the Ponyboys for poor police investigation. In fact, today's expert witness has testified that Dix couldn't have been at the murder scene at the time the two guys were shot, based on information the Ponyboys had determined. I attended the trial for an afternoon and heard Dix testify for two hours. Mr. Dix sounded to me, like an honest man who had fallen on some tough times. Being somewhat vulnerable, Dix was made the scapegoat when the Ponyboys tried to cover up a botched murder investigation.

Is there a parallel between the Dix case and the case of Das Kriminalen?

I think there just may be.

Perhaps the Ponyboys may want to change their motto to:

"We Always Get A Man".


Bob Lickacz

NFA Edmonton

LAST POST

Bullet to the brain ends ex-gun dealer's case
By LORI COOLICAN
Staff Writer
The trial of a former gun dealer facing 15 firearms-related charges linked
to deactivated guns has been cancelled due to his death - caused by a
bullet to the head.
Peter Kearns, 57, of Fort Saskatchewan died of a gunshot wound to the head
on Aug. 31, the Edmonton medical examiner's office confirmed yesterday.
Fort Saskatchewan RCMP did not return repeated phone calls - or fax
requests - asking if his death was under investigation.
Kearns was one of several people charged in the spring of 2001 after a
joint investigation by RCMP and Edmonton city police into the discovery of
formerly deactivated handguns at crime scenes. He pleaded not guilty and
was scheduled for a jury trial in Edmonton Court of Queen's Bench Nov. 3.
Deactivated guns - which have been welded or otherwise disabled - can be
legally sold without registration and are difficult to trace.
At the time of the investigation, city police spokesman Wes Bellmore said
one such weapon had been found at a homicide scene, while another was used
in the attempted shooting of a cop.
Both guns had been restored to make them
operational again, Bellmore said.
Kearns, the former owner of the nowclosed Kearns and McMurchy gun
dealership, 10585 115 St., spent years importing rare guns from eastern
Europe for Canadian collectors. His family declined comment yesterday.
Shortly after his home was searched in June 2001, Kearns told The Sun he
hadn't sold guns for a year and a half. All of them were deactivated
according to federal standards before they arrived in Canada, he said.
Blair Hault, owner of Edmonton's Lock & Load gun shop, 15889 116 Ave., was
also charged with unlawful ammunition sales and unlawful firearms possession.
After Lock and Load was searched by police in June 2001, Hault told The Sun
he sold deactivated handguns there, as well as the parts that can convert
them back to working condition. But Hault said those parts are readily
available at any gun shop, and he never told anyone how to reactivate them.
A third man, Randy Sinclair, was also charged with gun trafficking,
possession of a prohibited weapon and unlawful possession of a firearm
after the investigation.
The charges against both Hault and Sinclair were stayed by the Crown April
4, according to provincial court records.

"FREEDOM" For those who Fought, Bled and Died For It " FREEDOM " has a
FLAVOR THE PROTECTED will Never Know or Savor. Anonymous

------------------------------

See the Qualicum Firearms Raid, a Similar Case!

Concerning Bill C-245:

The Firearm Interest Police (FIP) database is designed to flag current and potential firearm licensees whenever they come in contact with the police. But instead of flagging only those contacts which indicate anti social behavior, FIP captures all contact with the police, including stepping forward to report a crime or being a victim. The problem is that if a Firearms Officer has (or develops) a strong anti gun bias, he or she is at liberty to consider all FIP entries as grounds for refusal or revocation of an individual’s firearms licence. As soon as the first Firearm Officer refuses to issue a license on the shaky grounds that because a person has lots of contacts with the police the person is unsuitable to own a gun, FIP will then begin to act as a deterrent to positive contacts with police. It will then foster and perpetuate both the "Don't get involved", and "Big Brother is watching" mindsets.

Justice is Locked Out of Court.

As I said earlier, Justice is locked out of the court room and is sitting on the steps of the court house. Have you ever wondered about the utter stupidity of the decisions some of these judges and parole boards are making? That is because you don’t see it from their perspective.

Couldn’t quite see the sense in the government seizing the arms of ordinary law abiding citizens, but letting criminals run rampant? Well, now that you know the federal government is totally illegitimate and our country is being illegally run into the ground by a group of foreign bankers and lawyers, it all kind of makes sense doesn't it? The truth always has a logical consistency, even if it is perverse.

Judges and lawyers like to keep the court doors spinning. It makes money for them and it makes money for their master; The Crown. It is as simple as that. Your fellow Canadians sell you out to their foreign masters for money. Apparently 40 pieces of silver has the same attraction today as it did 2000 years ago.

Ever wonder why they take a young fellow and make an example of him, but let the real criminals out the door nearly as soon as they get in there? The Crown wants as much crime as they can have. It is big money for them. They could give a damn about the effects of the crime on our society. It is exactly what they want.

They want as many young men in jail as they can so they can spiritually bankrupt them. A criminal record is also financially devastating. It guarantees that the victim of the courts will never amount to anything. Its part of the agenda.

Keep people broke, fighting with each other over scraps to survive and they are never going to look up and see what is going on. Break up the family unit so each of us learns to go it alone and never learn to work together for our common good. Keep people enraged by creating ‘problems’ and then coming up with ‘solutions’. And with every solution, you steal another right.

Why do we jail young people for smoking pot, stealing, etc…? These are not crimes that cause bodily harm to people. There is no need to segregate them from society. Yet we take hardened criminals that will do bodily harm and put them in half way houses or give them electronic ankle straps.

“Those that would give up their freedom for temporary security, deserve neither.”

Benjamin Franklin



Ever wonder why he said that? Pretty obvious now isn’t it?

Jim Townsend

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 14:19:46 -0600
From: "Breitkreuz, Garry - Assistant 1" <BreitG0@parl.gc.ca>
Subject: United Nations Attack on Gun Ownership

http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ipps/20010529/cm/united_nations_attack_on_gun_ownership_1.html

Wednesday May 30 01:00 AM EDT

United Nations Attack on Gun Ownership
By Phyllis Shlafly

The attempt this year to reprise last year's Million Mom March was a dud, attracting only about 200 demonstrators, and the Democrats' political gurus are whining about how Al Gore's pro-gun-control stance cost him votes last year in crucial states. So the anti-gun activists have moved to a less democratic venue: the United Nations.

On July 9 to 20, New York City will host the United Nations Conference on Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects. The purpose of this conference is to demonize the private ownership of guns and get governments to confiscate all privately owned guns.

Don't be misled by the term "small arms." UN documents define small arms as weapons "designed for personal use" (such as your Browning pistol, your Ruger rifle, or your inchester shotgun), while light weapons are for use by several persons as a crew.

Don't be misled by the term "illicit" trade. UN documents make it clear that, since most illegal guns start out as legal purchases, illicit trade must be stopped by clamping down on legal gun owners.

Don't think that this UN conference is just a talkfest. It is scheduled to produce a legally binding treaty to require governments to mark, number, register, record, license, confiscate and destroy all guns except those in the hands of the military and the police.

Indeed, the first day of the conference is to be called "Small Arms Destruction Day." The conference's Preparatory Committee (PrepCom) is calling on all governments, with the assistance of the UN's NGOs (Non-Government Organizations) and "civil society" (a fancy name for the NGOs working in tandem), to organize public events to promote the destruction of small arms and light weapons on that day.

The decision on NGO participation, adopted by the Prep Com without a vote, is in line with the growing UN practice of expanding the influence of "relevant" NGOs while bypassing sovereign member states. "Relevant " means only those NGOs that promote the UN agenda.

The 18-page Draft Program of Action to be presented to the July conference sets forth the rationale plus the mechanisms for eliminating the "wide availability" of guns. It's obvious that the United States is the target because we are the only country with a Second Amendment, and other democracies such as England, Canada and Australia have either banned or severely restricted private gun ownership.

The Draft Program wraps its gun-confiscation message in typical UN semantics, but makes little attempt to conceal the mailed fist in the velvet glove. It states: "In order to promote peace, security, stability and sustainable development in the world, we commit ourselves to addressing this problem in a comprehensive, integrated, sustainable, efficient and urgent
manner."

Indeed, the plan is comprehensive and integrated. According to the Draft Program, "Preventing and reducing the illicit trade in small arms and light weapons consists of two sets of measures: the national control of manufacture and the proper marking of small arms and light weapons, coupled with accurate, sustained record-keeping and exchanges of information."

Government "marking" and record-keeping is "an integral part" of the process. It's clear that the UN is demanding that governments build a national electronic database of all guns and their owners, and then facilitate "an information exchange" (i.e., share the database with the UN).

Through the Department for Disarmament Affairs, the UN promises to "develop an international mechanism that will facilitate the exchange of information on all aspects" of guns, i.e., a global gun registry.

To wipe out private gun ownership, the UN demands that all governments enforce "adequate laws, regulations and administrative procedures to exercise effective control over the legal manufacture and possession of small arms and light weapons." And the UN demands that governments criminally prosecute all those who don't comply.

The UN plans to develop "model national legislation" so that Congress will pass laws that conform to the treaty's requirements. The UN plans to guide Congress by publishing "best practices" for legislation and procedures.

All unmarked or inadequately marked small arms and light weapons are to be confiscated and "expeditiously destroyed." The government is to assure that "no re-transfer of small arms and light weapons takes place without prior authorization" by the government because the UN disapproves of the possession of guns by civilians who are "not part of responsible military and police forces."

The UN also has a plan to propagandize Americans to accept this global ban on private gun ownership. The Draft Program calls for "seminars, conferences, consultations and workshops conducted by the United Nations " for the purpose of "promoting the action plan."

As part of its "awareness-training" to induce Americans to accept the new ban-the-guns policy, the UN wants government to pledge to destroy guns in "public destruction events."

When the United Nations bounced us from the Human Rights Commission, while giving seats to Sudan, Libya, China and Cuba, that was just an insult. But it's deadly serious business when the UN tries to take away our guns.

© 2001 Copley News Service

------------------------------