I already know that this message doesn't 'exactly'=20 fall within MILCOM's instructions, but the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is, in reality, a para-military organization that arrives when there is a disaster, regardless of cause. For those=20 interested in monitoring FEMA, I wanted simply to provide some background on this federal agency which just so happens to have their southeastern regional headquarters next to my building. Being an amateur=20 (KE4UQZ) I found another federal employee who is=20 also an amateur! =20 When I was on activy duty with the Army (16 years total) I found out much of what went on within FEMA. Scarry stuff in terms of our Constitution and Bill of Rights. Especially many of their operation and contingency plans of which are highly classified. Many of their plans are 'Code-Word Material.' I won't go into further details on what this type of information is. Suffice it to say that it is information that is limited only to a very, very few within FEAM. The classifications of their plans are: Confidential, Secret, and Top Secret. I have a real problem with an agency such as FEMA having and generating information at those classifications. As an example, why does a flood area need clean-up plan=20 that is classified Secret? I use to see it time after time. The below information is a function statement only to give=20 you a better idea of what this agency's mission is all=20 about, and generally how they go about conducting these missions. I already know I'm going to get 'Hate-Mail' over this message and I would appreciate you saving these types of messages for another day. =20 All intelligence is good intelligence. Roger Cravens Atlanta, GA ----------------------------------------------------------- > FEMA: Blueprint For Tyranny=20 > By Roland C. Eyears > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Last year, America was treated to the heavily hyped, > blockbuster hit movie 'Independence Day,' which was no > more than a third-rate, feel-good production in which an > alien invasion was repelled by a president of questionable > ability as a trusting populace watched and hoped. > > The disaster theme has been carried even further by > several widely promoted offerings such as 'Twister,' > 'Volcano,' and the TV miniseries 'Earthquake,' based on > experiences in California. In February of this year, the > television miniseries 'Asteroid' was shown on NBC, > following a months-long barrage of blurbs. In the first > few minutes of this four-hour drama, a primary hero was > established. He was the one man who had the power to > marshal the resources needed to save the Earth. He was the > Director of FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency. > > How do you spell 'conditioning?' > > In 1984, Davenport, Iowa, suffered a '100-year flood' with > the downtown area under several feet of water. The people > had chosen not to build protection against the Mississippi > River, citing $20 million cost and concerns that a flood > wall would block a scenic view of the river. Underlying > their decision may have been a hope that if losses were > massive enough, a benevolent federal government would > rescue them. > > And so it came to pass, they begged part of a $10 billion > bailout package. FEMA got the credit. > > Emergencies and disasters, major and minor, occur every > day. So shouldn't a caring federal parent protect and > rebuild? On the surface, that seemed to be the thinking of > President Richard M. Nixon when his admin-istration > conceived the beginnings of FEMA. For a generation, the > government and the people had been concerned with > invasion, and then nuclear attack. As those threats ebbed > and the Cold War era passed, the violent demonstrations > attendant to the Vietnam War caused Nixon to refocus > emergency powers inward. Domestic unrest was the target; > the American people were thereafter to be seen as a > greater threat. > > Those who thought a president's power to be closely > limited received a shock when, in the early 1970s, Nixon > froze all wages and prices in a doomed attempt to break an > inflationary spiral. > > Ironically, the agency which preferred to remain low > profile had its 'outing' with Florida's Hurricane Andrew > in 1992. It did not show itself to be very responsive, > partly due to the waiting period for local and state > governments to appropriate their 25 percent share of > funds. Three days after the hurricane, Dade County 'still > had not received adequate aid.' Some critics called FEMA > inept and useless and suggested that disaster aid be > handled by the military. > > The 'Doomsday Establishment' > > The 'Doomsday Establishment' dates back to the day in 1949 > when the Soviets detonated an atomic device. By the > following year, the concept of 'Continuity of Gov-ernment' > (COG) had taken hold, based on the logical premise that an > enemy must know that a nuclear strike would leave our > government sufficiently intact to retaliate and to > continue to govern. To enable the highly classified 'COG' > program, a number of agencies such as the federal > Emergency Broadcast System were formed, later to be > consolidated into FEMA. The day came when great concern > was expressed over the layers of FEMA operations personnel > which had been inserted between the president and, without > exception, all other federal agencies. > > It was in that postwar era that construction began on the > top-secret luxury bunker beneath the Greenbriar Resort in > West Virginia. Hollowed out of the Blue Ridge Moun-tains > was the giant underworld at Mount Weather, built to house > the president, his cabinet and the Supreme Court justices. > Long gone is the day when President Eisenhower's > motorcade, speeding towards this Strangelovian bunker, was > stalled by a pig farmer's truck on a country road in > Virginia. Mount Weather was barely the beginning. In fact, > it is currently undergoing massive expansion. That and > over 50 more subterranean installations are today under > the cloak of FEMA. > > In his comprehensive book, 'Under-ground Bases and > Tunnels,' published in 1995 by the Adventures Unlimited > Press, Dr. Richard Sauder detailed the existence of > hundreds of subterranean installations, some vast in > scope. Quite a number of official publications, such as > the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' 'Utilization of Nuclear > Power Plants in Underground Installations' were found > which confirm the existence of such systems. > > A 1985 report, 'Literature Survey of Underground > Construction Methods for Ap-plication to Hardened > Facilities,' produced by the Corps of Engineers, concluded > that the technology to construct such bases has been in > place for some time. The only problem has been financial. > In view of the substantial increases in military budgets > during the Reagan and Bush years, funding shortages ended > in the 1980s. > > The Rand Corp., a major defense contract-or, has been a > major player since its founding in 1948. For years, this > firm studied prospective sites for underground facilities > and coordinated the efforts of government and private > industry to effect construction. > > A three-volume report issued by the Corps in 1964, > 'Feasibility of Constructing Large Underground Cavities,' > identified 12 recommended sites around the country. It > was, however, pointed out that there is no area in which > massive underground centers cannot be built. > > Not to be left out, the U.S. Navy operates its own > 'undergrounds,' as they are often called. One is > reportedly located at Sugar Grove, W. Va., from where it > allegedly eavesdrops on microwave communications. > > U.S. News & World Report stated in a 1989 article that > FEMA and the Pentagon control some 50 underground command > posts designated as possible refuges for the president in > time of national emergency. Specifically mentioned were > the giant facility at Mount Weather, near Bluemont, W.V., > and its alternative at Raven Rock, also known as the > Ritchie Facility, near the Pennsylvania-Maryland border. > Many of these facilities are equipped to independently > support hundreds of persons for months. > > Some evidence exists that the White House sits on a > complex underground installation, constructed in secret > over many years. One reliable source relates being > escorted to the '17th level' to deliver documents. It was > his strong impression at the time that he had not reached > the bottom. > > Dr. Sauder has written of federal officials who stated > that from the 1970s a resident, parallel government was in > place in the Mount Weather facility. These officials > stated that all major federal departments and agencies > were represented. The senior officials held cabinet-level > rank and were addressed by subordinates as 'Mr. > Secretary.' Perhaps more disturbing is the claim that > these mirror-image leaders were not bound by conventional > terms of office and overlapped administrations under COG. > > Supplementing Mount Weather are said to be 96 satellite > relocation centers within the so-called 'Federal Arc,' > that is, within 300 miles of D.C. Jack Anderson wrote in > The Washington Post in 1991 of the '$5 billion network of > bunkers filled with high-tech communications equipment at > secret locations around the country.' > > At Mount Pony, Culpepper, Va., is the 140,000-square-foot > underground bunker of the Federal Reserve System. > Constructed in the late 1960s, it is entirely > self-sufficient, including cold storage for the deceased. > Reportedly, the Fed stores $5 billion in greenbacks there > against the need to reissue. > > A Time magazine cover story in August of 1992 alleged that > Mount Pony was being phased out due to 'obsolescence of > mission.' This has been described as government > disinformation. > > Dr. Sauder has uncovered authorities who seriously propose > bunkers of impressive depth and size. Both the Defense > Nuc-lear Agency and Los Alamos National Lab-oratory have > discussed facilities to 6,000 feet underground. A 1984 > front-page article in the New York Times featured a plan > to build a massive tunnel housing a missile system, > presumably in the western states, which would run 400 > miles at a depth of 2,500 to 3,500 feet. A joint report > published in 1988 by the U.S. Committee on Rock Mechanics > and the U.S. National Commit-tee on Tunneling Technology > proposed a missile system housed at depths of 3,000 to > 8,000 feet. > > A 1981 report by the U.S. National Committee on Tunneling > Technology projected as much as 20 million cubic meters of > earth and rock to be removed between 1985 and 1995, > exclusive of routine civil construction involving the > Corps of Engineers. > > A point to dwell on is that those underground facilities > with which FEMA is not today directly involved will fall > under its control the moment a national emergency is > declared. > > Acquisitions continue. Several years ago at a cost of $20 > million, a Texas oil baron built a residential complex > complete with a 60-bed underground hospital at Georgetown, > near Austin. When he became financially insolvent, the > complex was lost to a savings and loan which was > subsequently taken over by unidentified interests. Today, > that institution's door is guarded by armed security. > Several months ago, FEMA bought the property at auction > with our tax dollars. > > Questions keep arising concerning the agency's 'bunker > mentality.' Who is to be protected? And from whom? > Certainly, it cannot be the people who would be sheltered. > That leaves top government officials and the owners of our > country. A full scale nuclear attack has become highly > improbable, and a conventional invasion is out of the > question.That leaves but one possibility: FEMA's > underworld has been created to keep the elite safe from > the people. > > Quiet speculation has built over time regarding the true > purposes and practices of FEMA, but there have been scant > glimpses at the agency's black ops. In June 1983, Senate > investigators became aware of a series of C-130 and C-140 > flights destined for Texas. Flight times for these > aircraft, together with the installation of troop carrier > seats, suggested the secret transport of soldiers into > Central America. When answers were demanded, FEMA invoked > 'continuity of government' and refused comment. The agency > had placed itself above Congress, and not even the Senate > Intelligence Committee could determine what was happening. > > One attempt at an internal audit revealed that FEMA had > spent a large, unspecified amount of money on electrical > installations in the Golden Gate National Recreation Area > in San Francisco. Beyond a mention of COG, the agency > established to assist in time of floods and earthquakes > would explain nothing. > > The Birth of FEMA > > If FEMA has a predecessor document, it must be Executive > Order 11490 signed by Richard M. Nixon on Oct. 28, 1969. > In consolidating emergency functions, this massive 40-page > fiat dealt with 21 executive orders and two Defense > Mobilization Orders. > > The document describes, in part, proposals to 'develop > plans and procedures for the provision of logistical > support to members of foreign forces, their employees and > dependents as may be present in the United States under > terms of bilateral or multilateral agreements which > authorize such support in the event of a national > emergency... Further declarations found in Nixon's 11490 > cover labor conscription and control of the money supply. > > In evidence is Department of the Army Memorandum marked > 1994 ATKO-KM, dated July 1994 and issued out of Fort > Monroe, Va.: 'SUBJECT: Draft Army Regulation on Civilian > Inmate Labor Program.' It specifically calls for comments > on procedures 'to establish civilian prison camps on > installations.' Obviously, some people do not believe the > Posse Comitatus Act (delegating authority to county > governments in the late 1800s) carries any weight or will > be around much longer. > > Those who think it can't happen here should restudy recent > American history. During World War II, tens of thousands > of our citizens, primarily Japanese-Americans, were > interned in deplorable conditions while their property was > legally stolen from them. Based on Executive Order 3066 > signed in December 1941, by President Franklin D. > Roosevelt, concentration camps were hastily built in the > western deserts as these people, most native-born, were > herded together. Japanese-Americans not on the West Coast > were relatively untouched. Yet during the entire war, > there occurred not a single documented instance of spying > or sabotage by Americans of Japanese ancestry. > > It is interesting that Executive Order 11490 was not > issued as a White House press release, nor was it printed > in the Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents. Due > to reasons of workability, a cloak of secrecy was not > feasible. However, this was not a document which was > supposed to be readily accessible. > > Zbigniew Brzezinski, cofounder of the Trilateral > Commission and National Security Council Advisor to > President Jimmy Carter in the late 1970s, wrote the master > plan together with NSC staffer Samuel Huntington. Four > years earlier in Kyoto, Japan, Huntington had delivered a > disturbing paper advocating the end to democracy and its > replacement with a 'crisis management' form of government. > > President Carter's Executive Order 12148, dated July 20, > 1979, retroactively made effective July 15, gave FEMA > life. That fiat revoked 13 previously issued Executive > Orders, amended 19 others, and cited as authority 13 > federal statutes. > > It should be noted that the great bulk of executive orders > deal with matters outside the operations of the executive > branch. These presidential edicts become law when > published in the Federal Register. It has been the style > of some presidents to cite specific legislation as their > authority to issue certain executive orders. As de facto > legislation without debate and oversight, they are quite > unconstitutional. Yet, they stand completely unchallenged > by Congress and the high court, the two supposedly > countervailing branches of government. > > Moreover, much of the enabling legislation is plainly > unconstitutional and should have no force of law. The > reality is that the most marvelous legal document ever to > spring from the mind of man, our U.S. Constitu-tion, has > been rendered nearly inoperative.Fully realizing that a > legitimate bill to establish FEMA would never survive the > legislative process =A5 given agency turf battles and > serious concerns of a handful of congressmen =A5 Carter > created the monster with a stroke of his pen. > > During the 1980s when FEMA was assembling the cumbersome > regulations for which bureaucrats are famous, a standard > complaint was that 'FEMA doesn't listen.' After an > unsuccessful appeal of a costly restriction, Janet Queen > of the Home Builders Association of Central Arizona > commented, 'A lot of technical data has been given. > There's been no answer as to why that information has been > discredited. They have only stated it was not accepted.' > > A consensus was building that the only thing FEMA was not > much good was at focusing on its primary mandate. > Performance had improved by 1993 when FEMA dealt with > flooding across the Midwest. The agency was lauded for > moving swiftly, without waiting for guidance from the > state or Washington. The reason cited: the director, James > Lee Witt, native of Wildcat Hollow and 14 years the > Director for Emergency Services for the State of Arkansas, > was the sole political appointee. > > FEMA's duties and responsibilities have expanded > geometrically over the years. The agency's name is now > found on numerous mortgage documents, especially if land > on a flood plain is involved. Flood insurance is a field > which has been taken over by the agency. In 1992 FEMA > funded the New England States Earthquake Consortium > to-gether with insurance industry groups. In many > instances where people were unable to qualify for > low-interest loans or reconstruction assistance, free > grants of public money were made by the agency. How better > to build gratitude while providing disincentives to > prepare? In the Midwest, FEMA launched a prototype > Geographic Information System to mix commercial and custom > software designed to map and analyze data. > > FEMA is no stranger to the art and science of relocating > people, whether or not they want to go. In 1983, a > chemical compound thought to cause cancer, dioxin, was > found in soil in and around the community of Times Beach, > Mo. FEMA engineered a federal buyout and removal of the > town's 2,400 residents. > > But what is the true nature of this seemingly all-purpose > agency, which has been given responsibility to save us > from quakes, refugee situations, toxic spills, excess > rain, home heating emergencies, forest fires, ur-ban riots > and the like? This parallel government, as some have > termed it, makes no public disclosures and operates > largely off budget. > > Executive Order 12148 authorizes a president or his > designate, the director of FEMA, to assume virtually > unlimited powers in the event of a civil emergency, > defined as 'any accidental, natural, man-caused, or > wartime emergency or threat thereof, which causes or may > cause substantial injury or harm to the population or > substantial damage to or loss of property. > > Translated, it means FEMA can intervene 'at will.' > > Although the director of FEMA was originally subject to > oversight by the secretary of defense and the National > Security Council, such was not the case for long. One day > in the early 1980s, a colleague of this writer attended a > joint meeting on the bottom of a five-level deep FEMA > installation near Battle Creek, Mich. As the regional > director lectured, a USAF colonel half-dozed. But when the > speaker explained that in the event of a major civil > emergency, the Joint Chiefs of Staff would report to the > director of FEMA, the full bird instantly came to life. > Eyes shining like those of an eagle, he nearly came out of > his chair. > > By January 1994, when a major quake hit California, the > agency had undergone a sweeping reorganization for greater > efficiency. After the 750-bed Jewish Home for the Aging of > Greater Los Angeles was de-stroyed (total injuries: one > broken hip), FEMA supplied 70 percent of rebuilding costs. > At $8 billion the disaster relief package was the largest > in history. In San Francisco, the American Conservatory > Theater was in shambles; FEMA contributed $9.3 million of > the $21.5 million needed to rebuild. The agency then > pledged 90 percent of repair costs to communities damaged > by the Northridge Earthquake, plus another $44 million to > rebuild the state's Palo Alto campus in Northern > California. > > Media lapdogs attributed these successes to the > sensitivity of FEMA Director James Lee Witt. In February > 1996, Bill Clinton elevated the director's position to > cabinet status. The genie had emerged from the > smoked-glass bottle. > > Budgets & Guesses > > Between 1982 and 1992 Congress visibly appropriated to > FEMA $243 million for disaster relief and $2.9 billion for > 'other purposes.' Informed sources place black operations > spending at 12 times the published disaster relief > figures. Earlier estimates put FEMA's annual appropriation > at something above $3 billion, however a-mounts are buried > in Department of Defense 'black operations' requests for > funds which are submitted without explanation. > > 'Seeking Help of Federal Government' was the title of a > widely circulated news article which purported to prove > that the commercial market was not up to the task of > providing adequate loss coverage. In mid-1995, FEMA made > the news by requesting a $184 million federal loan while > promising a three-year payback. It is a well-settled point > of law that the notes and obligations of one federal > entity to another carry no legal weight. This could only > have been a clever attempt to portray the agency as not > excessively fund-ed, mimic more conventional agencies, and > appear to be an essential service of a caring government. > > Such amounts fail to meet the lowest level of plausible > deniability, even allowing for spinoff of a small number > of operations to the Department of Defense as recommended > by the National Academy of Public Administration's 1993 > review. The academy further estimated that 27 percent of > the previous year's allocations had gone into a dark hole. > > It has been reported that FEMA distributed $3.4 billion in > aid in 1994, while the states dispensed $625 million. > > On Feb. 10, 1997, the FEMA news desk released the agency's > Fiscal 1998 Request to Congress covering Oct. 1, 1997, to > Sept. 30, 1998. The total request for $3.3 billion covered > a projected 9.7 million man-hours, and includes operating > accounts of $374 million. Of the $2.8 billion earmarked > for the Disaster Relief Fund, almost $2.4 billion was to > address real and estimated requirements for 1997 and prior > years. Additionally, a contingency fund of $5.8 billion > was re-quested to cover variety of anticipated disasters > without specific targeting. > > The operating accounts contain an allocation of $6.2 > million to address certain aspects of the president's > counterterrorism initiatives related to 1997. While other > monies might later be shifted into this function, the > request provides basic notice and justification. FEMA > heralds the fact that its request for operating accounts > represents a net decrease of $15.2 million from an earlier > estimate. > > In its fiscal 1998 request, FEMA offered what could most > politely be termed a gratuitous statement, to wit: 'Over > the past 25 to 30 years, the nation's exposure to losses > from natural hazards has increased dramatically...' > > This is apparently meant to loosen purse strings and > prevent criticism of agency overreach. However, it prompts > two questions. One, has our building technology regressed > so as to make our infrastructure more damage prone? Two, > are we being told that vis-a-vis all recorded history, the > last quarter century in America has sustained most of the > bad weather? > > If the '12 factor' relating to black ops is applied, one > might see true FEMA budget topping $33 billion. Who knows? > > Fourteen congressional committees have claimed limited > oversight. However, it is generally admitted that such > reviews are rubber-stamp exercises. Can FEMA's real focus > be on natural calamities? The congressional watchdog unit > known as the General Accounting Office conducted as close > a study as possible in early 1992. The finding was that > less than 10 percent of FEMA's staff was assigned to deal > with major storms, hurricanes and the like. > > Until media pressure forced the agency to disclose the > existence of its Mobile Emer-gency Response Support fleet, > not a single MERS had ever been employed in a disaster. > These 300 awesome power unit/communications command > vehicles capable of self-sustainment for over a month had > been deemed far too important to use in the agency's > stated mission =A5 that of helping Americans > > No rational person would deny the need of a society for a > government. Watchdog-ging it, however, is a different > matter. Con-gress has done a particularly poor job of > oversight. Even if members of Congress do try to become > informed about a program, they may be denied. At his > discretion, the Secretary of Defense may waive his > obligation to brief all but eight senior members of > Congress about a secret program. > > A responsibility that the Federal Emergency Management > Agency (FEMA) takes most seriously is insuring the > survivability of the federal government in the event of > nuclear attack. The seven-level deep facility at Mount > Weather near Berryville, Va., built during the Cold War > years, has been expanded and is lavishly maintained by and > for FEMA executives and national officials. One source > reports that the agency has spent approximately 94 percent > of its budget not on disasters, but on this and dozens of > other mostly secret under-ground installations. > > The cloak of national security enables bureaucrats, > buffoons, and plunderers to conjure up all manner of > schemes and bury all kinds of mistakes and crimes. For > example, a dozen years ago military thinkers were told to > list priceless Pentagon treasures which should be > relocated prior to attack. Selections included portraits > of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. > > Some forms of irreverence never change. One snowstormy day > in the capital during the late 1980s, a bureaucrat > assigned minor functions at Mount Weather decided to > conduct her own exercise in prestige. From her purse she > unsheathed a "priority ID card" which instructed all > persons to expedite her journey. Expecting to jump to the > head of the line, she flashed this credential at a bus > driver. He laughed at her and pointed to the end of the > queue. "Oh well," she probably thought, "I'm sure everyone > would show me more respect if a real nuclear war were > raging." > > In the words of Dr. Henry Kliemann, political scientist at > Boston University: > > "Those words enunciated by President Gerald Ford in > Executive Order 11921, were understood by FEMA to > mean that one day they would be in charge of the > country. As these bureaucrats saw it, FEMA's real > mission was to wait, prepare and then take over when > some 'situation' seemed serious enough to turn the > United States into a police state." > > The General > > A closer look at one of FEMA's most influential directors > might be instructive. In 1981, President Ronald Reagan > appointed as FEMA director Louis O. Giuffrida, a > security-obsessed general in the California Na-tional > Guard, and veteran of World War II and the resultant Cold > War-divided Berlin. While attending the Army War College > in 1970, Giuffrida authored a paper advocating the > declaration of Martial Law in the event of widespread > uprisings by black militants, together with the roundup > and incarceration of at least 21 million "American > Negroes" into "assembly centers or relocation camps." > > Deeply disturbed by widespread protests of the Vietnam > War, Reagan did not view the participants as young > citizens taking to the streets to petition their > government, but as dangerous elements of civil unrest. He > established the California Specialized Training Institute > in 1971 and installed Giuffrida as its director. During > his 10 years at CSTI, more than 27,000 police officials > from every state in the union plus 25 foreign nations > passed through. "The General," as he insisted on being > addressed, personally taught the week-long, highly intense > course in civil disorder management. Among course topics > were contemporary insurgency, terrorism, control force > intelligence and mass arrest procedures. In the course > manual, Giuffrida wrote of Martial Law: > > "It requires no proclamation, although one is > generally made. ... Martial rule comes into existence > upon a determination (not a declaration) by the > senior military commander that civil government must > be replaced because it is no longer functioning > anyway." > > Out of CSTI came the modern Special Weapons and Tactics > (SWAT) team, admittedly an adaptation of long-range > search-and-destroy patrol techniques applied to urban > America. This is not to suggest that SWAT teams should not > exist within each and every major police department. > Rather, it is to illustrate the mindset of FEMA's director > towards "combat patrols" versus disaster relief. > > "The General" further wrote: "Legitimate violence is > integral to our form of government. For it is from this > source that we can continue to purge our weaknesses." > Plainly, Giuffrida was not referring to foreign threats. > > In 1982 President Reagan issued National Security > Directive 58 (kin to an Executive Order) which enabled > Robert "Bud" McFarlane and Oliver North to use the > National Security Council to secretly redirect FEMA from > an inept, poorly conceived, obscure agency into its > current mode. > > REX-84 > > By 1984, the biannual "REX exercises" had fallen under the > auspices of FEMA. President Reagan signed Presidential > Directive Number 54 specifically authorizing REX-84 as > formulated by Lt. Colonel Oliver North. Whereas REX-82 had > been conducted in conjunction with a Pentagon war game > termed "Proud Saber," REX-84 was so highly classified that > special metal security doors were installed on the fifth > floor of the agency's Washington headquarters building. > Even long-term officials of the Civil Defense Office were > barred. > > The stated intention of REX-84 was to test the readiness > of FEMA and those elements under its command to assume > military control in the event of widespread civil unrest > concurrent with a significant U.S. military incursion into > Central America, specifically the invasion of Nicaragua > planned by North and his accomplices in the National > Security Council. > > An internal memo written by the Joint Chiefs of Staff the > previous December first described in considerable detail > the steps involved in calling out the troops in response > to an undefined national emergency. Listed were exceptions > to the Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits the U.S. > military from law enforcement activities within our > national boundaries. Authority cited was "the inherent > legal right of the United States Government to ensure the > preservation of public order ... by force if necessary," a > murky and inaccurate assertion struck down by the U.S. > Supreme Court in 1952 when President Harry Truman seized > the steel mills. > > REX-84 assumed a mass of some 400,000 refugees streaming > into the U.S. from across the Mexican border. Within a > six-hour period, FEMA and its subordinate agency, the > Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), were to > apprehend and detain such persons in 10 detention centers > established on active or former military bases scattered > around the country. > > Strategists have privately raised several troubling > questions about this exercise. Could that many people > physically rush the U.S.-Mexico border within the stated > time frame? Considering the rough, foreboding terrain > typical along the border and the extent to which refugees > could disperse, how logical is it to attempt to roundup > 400,000 persons, who have very little to lose, within six > hours? If such was the true intent of the exercise, why > would not the concentration camps -- sorry, the "detention > centers" -- be set up near the border? > > "The Spotlight," a long-standing populist newspaper based > in Washington, D.C., exposed REX-84 that year in a series > of investigative reports which uncovered plans to stir > into the mix the arrest of dissidents and "potential > subversives." > > Strenuously opposing Rex-84 was William French Smith, who > had been serving as U.S. attorney general since 1981. He > was a long-time confidante of Ronald Reagan, as well as > his personal attorney and a member of the "kitchen > cabinet" that engineered Reagan's rise to the presidency. > Smith criticized stipulations for the declaration of > martial law, turning control of all governmental functions > over to FEMA, suspension of the U.S. Constitution, and the > appointment of military commanders to run all state and > local affairs. > > Wallace Stickney, George Bush's FEMA director, has stated > that he was not given access to the agency's most > sensitive plans. He relates an instance wherein a > congressional appropriations committee questioned his > staff about a particular expenditure. He reacted: "I was > aware funding was being passed through but didn't know > where it was going -- nor did Congress, which demanded to > know." Generally, when the "doomsday budget" was > questioned, says Stickney, national security was > mentioned, and "it was overlooked by gentlemen's > agreement." > > Miami Herald Exclusive > > On July 5, 1987, the front page of the Miami Herald led > with an extensively researched article on what the lead > counsel for the Senate Iran-Contra Committee called "a > secret government within a government." > > It was the conclusion of many administration officials and > congressional investigators that from the first days of > the Reagan administration, a parallel government operated > outside the established cabinet and department lines of > authority. Oliver North was found to be a key figure in > the group, which conducted activities through a network of > colleagues who acted under their directions, but did not > officially report to them. From time to time, cabinet > members or top aides detected side channel operations. > > However, their efforts to question such projects were > ineffectual, partly due to concerns that the president's > wishes might be involved. Indeed, a number of ranking > sources confirmed Mr. Reagan's knowledge of and > participation in a number of these unofficial programs. > > The Herald went on to name Attorney General Edwin Meese, > CIA Director Wil-liam Casey and National Security Advisor > William Clark, all close friends and advisors to the > president, as major players in "the secret structure." > > Operating out of the Old Executive Office Building most of > the time, North worked closely with FEMA to redraw > national contingency plans dealing with nearly everything > from nuclear attack to civil insurrection. The martial-law > component was reflected in a June 30, 1982, memo written > by John Brinkerhoff, deputy to Director Guiffrida. The > text was reminiscent of Guiffrida's controversial paper > written at the War College in Carlisle, Pa., in 1970. > > FEMA's action plan included the declaration of martial > law, suspension of the Constitution and aggressive moves > against dissenters. A trigger could be "violent and > widespread internal dissent." This plan and its failure to > clearly define a national crisis caused Attorney General > Smith to issue an official protest. The Herald reported > that on Aug. 2, 1984, Smith emphatically expressed to > National Security Advisor Robert "Bud" McFarlane his alarm > over FEMA's "expansion of the definition of severe > emergency to encompass 'routine' domestic law enforcement > emergencies." > > Smith openly fumed that FEMA's "mobilization exercise > scenarios continue to assign FEMA the responsibility of > representing the Department of Justice and other cabinet > agencies at meetings with the president and the National > Security Council during national security emergencies." > > Understandably, Smith's resignation was accepted in early > 1984, although he agreed to remain until his successor, > the more flexible Edwin Meese, could gain Senate > confirmation. In the closing days of his service, Smith > wrote, "This Department and others have repeatedly raised > serious policy and legal objections to the creation of an > 'emergency czar' role for FEMA." > > It is thought that the courage of Attorney General Smith > and the expose by The Spotlight helped cost Giuffrida his > top post. > > In its Oct.17, 1994, issue, The Spotlight published an > article titled "Dictatorial Powers for FEMA" based on > Senate bill S. 1697, introduced in November 1993 by > Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.). The bill died without reaching > the Senate floor. But who needs actual legislation > anymore? Bill Clinton accomplished the purposes of the > bill and more when he signed Executive Order 12919 on June > 3, 1994. > > This executive order cited authority under the Defense > Production Act of 1950 and one section of the U.S. Code. > Thirteen executive orders were revoked or amended, > definitions were expanded, and more presidential powers > were delegated to the director of FEMA. > > Of particular interest is Part VI of Executive Order > 12919. The head of any FEMA department or agency is > empowered to establish an expertise-based National Defense > Executive Reserve. Section 602 authorizes any head "to > employ persons of outstanding experience and ability > without compensation. ..." This writer believes there is > an impolite term for that. > > Today FEMA commands a vast communications network, > technical equipment of near-Star Wars level, an extensive > nationwide system of underground bunkers, hundreds of > refurbished military installations, and easily activated > control of a formidable military force -- both U.S. and > foreign. The agency operates widely dispersed, newly > constructed detention facilities which might be mistaken > for hospitals. How curious that such activity has become > common at closed military bases. Many include rail spurs > in a time when there are no legitimate commodities with > the bulk and weight which would justify rail hauling. In > separate parts of the country, telephone-intercept vans > capturing signals have been traced to FEMA. With computers > programmed to lock in on certain words and phrases, > recording devices are triggered. > > People have observed mounted on 15- to 25-foot high towers > or utility poles near intersections what appear to weather > sensors, ostensibly to provide weather data enabling > efficient helicopter operations. They will generally > include a wind velocity spinner, mirrors, precipitation > detector, and canister -- all unpainted metal. These are > Automatic Weather Observation System (AWOS) terminals > which transmit findings via cellular phones. Just as > interesting are the mobile AWOS terminals, typically > mounted in pick-up truck beds or on bumper/frames, > standing 12 to 13 feet high so as to clear bridges and > overpasses. It is true that such a system could be used, > for example, to help evacuate disaster victims. Might it > also assist in the clandestine pick-up of dissident > prisoners? A successful exercise in exactly this type of > operation took place in Columbus, Ohio, in the spring of > 1994. The excuse: drug busts. > > If the AWOS devices are legitimate, why do the installers > and the Scan Corp., manufacturer of the system, refuse to > comment? > > Defense Resources Act, Section 1001, states in part: > > "Whenever the President shall deem that the public > safety demands it, he may cause to be censored under > such rules and regulations as he from time to time > may establish, communications by mail, cable, radio, > television or other means of transmission crossing > the borders of the United States." > > In that vein, FEMA "Plan D" is a 36-page document dealing > with the direct takeover of all telecommunications in the > event of an "emergency." > > Members of the Department of Energy, another federal > agency which maintains its own formidable police force, > have been seen planting charges deep in the natural > fissures of Yellowstone National Park. One or more nuclear > explosions in these locations could alter magma levels, > leading to violent eruptions from long-dormant volcanoes. > Under the right circumstances, such seemingly natural > emergencies could justify mobilization of FEMA. > > Civil rights tensions ran high in the 1960s, based on > generations-old injustices and exacerbated by such special > interests as the American Communist Party. The Watts riots > of 1965 in Los Angeles were duplicated on a smaller scale > in Detroit, New Orleans, Newark and many other American > cities. The national government was not ready to move, but > the wake-up call was heard. > > In April and May of 1992, Los Angeles was the home of the > greatest civil disturbances since the American Civil War. > The Rodney King-related riots saw more than 20,000 > arrests, widespread looting as thousands upgraded their > sound systems, more than 100 killed, and thousands of > businesses burned. It is a matter of record that weeks > earlier the Revolutionary Communist Party had been > distributing pamphlets predicting these riots. Further, as > the nation watched, the L.A. Police Department "stood > down," according to their orders. > > Investigators with the L.A. Fire Depart-ment have > confirmed that a significant percentage of the city's > thousands of fires were the result of sophisticated > incendiary devices =A5 well beyond the capability of the > average looter. > > Has there been a modern instance of martial law in the > United States? Hours after the Japanese attack on Pearl > Harbor in 1941, Hawaii was placed under such status. > Ac-cording to law and long-standing court decisions, > martial law must be lifted as soon as the emergency has > passed and civil authorities are capable of functioning. > Military minds and possessors of unbridled power being > what they are, martial law persisted until 1944 when the > U.S. Supreme Court ruled that its continuation long after > supporting conditions expired was an unconstitutional > abuse of authority. Martial law was in effect for more > than a week in L.A. Had the Rodney King riots, which > spread to 166 other cities, continued to escalate, the > possibility was strong that a national state of emergency > would have been declared, complete with suspension of > habeas corpus and the U.S. Constitution. Apparently, the > time was not ripe. > > [Note: Roland Eyears will be on 890 AM KDXU St. George, > Utah on August 26th from 4-5 p.m. Mountain Time.] > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > ******************************************************************** * Liberty is NEVER an option ... only a condition to be lost! * * http://www.jbs.org * ******************************************************************** * Roger Cravens, SYSOP * * South East Signals Intelligence Group BBS: (770-) 942-1089 * * Atlanta, GA * ******************************************************************** * Signals Intelligence: "... and the truth will set you free"! * ********************************************************************