- Why are we threatening to bomb Iraq .
. . again? As with most wars of the twentieth century, we are considering
the conflict because of oil. In 1991, America, with the aid of most of
the world, bombed Iraq into near oblivion in the now infamous Gulf War.
During that "contest" the people of the world watched and cheered
as the Iraqis were slaughtered. Civilians and soldiers alike were killed
because Iraq had invaded Kuwait and big oil was in danger of losing control
of a huge Persian-Gulf spigot. Today, seven years later, the people of
Iraq do without food, water and medicine as they languish in poverty and
disease. The country is dying a slow, painful death. This misery is said
to be caused because Iraq is out of compliance with weapons inspection
teams demands.
-
- The Gulf War victory over the Iraqi dictator
was acclaimed as the world rejoiced. But, in the wake of the war, some
of the world awakened. This writer had strewn yellow ribbons about his
office and flew flags during the conflagration until George Bush gave his
"New World Order" speech. The next day, the ribbons and flags
were silently removed; this writer's innocence and naivete about American
wars was shattered. Bush clearly wanted America to be the world policeman;
he actually said so. Exporting liberty worldwide might be a good thing,
if, indeed it is possible to do such a thing, but exporting police power
is abominable.
-
- Even being a vet, I could no longer support
this country's military pursuit in the Gulf. No longer could I fall for
the line of the Party that "We must support our troops, even if we
disagree with the conflict." From that day forward, I realized that
I could only support our troops by standing up for what is right, by standing
for liberty, by standing for honor.
-
- My newly-awakening mind raced as I recalled
that Hitler's forces were rated as invincible as they battled in Europe
and Russia, but that as soon as the Germans turned their forces toward
the oil country of the Middle East, their fortunes changed immediately.
The allies unleashed their pit-bull, George Patton, who could have torn
through Hitler's forces at will anytime except Eisenhauer collared him
for being politically incorrect in disciplining a soldier. Big oil didn't
want the war to end and Patton would have probably set out the remainder
if Hitler hadn't gone after the oil cache in the Middle East. The unleashed
pit- bull ripped through the soft underbelly of the Third Reich with savage
efficiency. So effective was Patton that he was called off the prey. Why?
Could it be that once the Middle East oil reserves were again protected
and assured survivability, that the continuation of the war was a benefit
to big oil?
-
- Like World War II, the big-oil directed
Gulf War of 1991 extracted a huge toll. While it took a few years for
the American people to discover that the American forces used all manner
of weapons of mass destruction against everyone in the gulf, including
their own soldiers, the people did so learn. Depleted uranium shells
had been fired from tanks, deadly chemicals were exploded at munitions'
caches, and wild biologicals were incubated and spread via serums and in
the air during the Gulf War. Americans came home with the Gulf War Illnesses,
which our government denied to exist. Our vets who served in the war were
mocked and told the illnesses they suffered from were psychosomatic. Those
who suffer from GWI were called crazy by the government. These stricken
vets suffered from and continue to suffer severe physical ailments, but
out government denies them even a modicum of treatment. And, these supposed
"mental illnesses" have spread to the vets' spouses, their children,
and even to their family pets. Yet, still, the government lies about the
origin of the illnesses. These stricken vets are still ridiculed by the
government that sent them into the fray, and therein poisoned them. All
this was done for and continues to be done for big oil interests in Kuwait.
I pray that God will bless and heal our courageous and stricken vets,
and reward corrupt leaders and big oil with their just due.
-
- Seven years after the first slaughter
of Iraq, in February of this year, Clinton tried to form another coalition
of Saddam haters to again battle the "Great Satan." This time,
however, most of the world sat in silence as America was only able to garner
the support of Great Britain and a few of the British colonies turned free
states in the aborted confrontation.
-
- Of course there could be little support
mustered; big oil wasn't in jeopardy at the time. Instead, the motive
of the February bombing attempt was that Clinton was deep into the Lewinsky
scandal. The movie "Wag the Dog" had just been released, which
perhaps led to Clinton's brainstorm of an Iraqi-war-for-scandal swap.
This foolish plan would have been based upon the absurd logic that if a
fake war had worked in the movie, a real war might be doubly effective.
Clinton apparently did not understand that "Wag the Dog" was
a satire, hence was not supposed to work in real life.
-
- Why did Great Britain support Clinton
in the foolish attempt of February? Perhaps the answer is in the Book of
Daniel, chapter seven, where we learn that the prophet saw four beasts
as the endtime approached:
-
- The first was like a lion, and had eagle's
wings; I beheld till the wings thereof were plucked, and it was lifted
up from the earth, and made stand upon the feet as a man, and a man's heart
was given to it.
-
- Is it not reasonable to discern that
Great Britain is the lion and America is the eagle? Given that analysis,
can it not also be accepted that the wings of the eagle were clipped because
Clinton has remained the president despite being exposed for all his moral
turpitude? And, could the endtime be so close, and the first beast so
desperate as to expose itself for all the world to see?
-
- So, what happened to Bill Clinton's ill-fated
plan that had all the substance of a Hollywood satire? Where did the missiles
he had intended to launch at Saddam go? Clinton's transparent military
plan could not be supported by big oil because it was too childish to avoid
detection. Without the support of big oil, Clinton was left to his own
devices to cover his filthy tracks, and, co-incidentally, two American
embassies were simultaneously bombed, and, in retaliation for those bombings,
the sovereign countries of Afghanistan and Sudan became the recipients
of the missiles. Why? Because Clinton had a stupid plan to cover up his
lies. Will there be any UN sanctions against the US and Clinton for these
attacks? Of course not. Will there be retaliations? Probably. Who will
be blamed for the retaliations? Saddam, most probably.
-
- Today, November 13, 1998, Clinton has
again rebuilt the strike forces in the Persian Gulf. We are on a war footing.
Our country showed in the past war there that it will use chemical, biological
and nuclear weapons, and in fact, did use all of those types of horrible
weapons in the 1991 Gulf War. These terrible weapons are once again poised
at Saddam, but with a different intent than was behind them in February
of 1998. Why? Big oil, of course. Therefore, Saddam would be wise not
to test the steel of resolve, but, he apparently misunderstands and thinks
it is just Clinton after him again, and the Iraqi leader probably won't
back down to Clinton. He doesn't respect him; who does?
-
- The official Clinton line is that Saddam
is refusing to comply with the weapons-inspection process of the United
Nations. Anyone who has read and understands the import of the American
federal income tax code knows that our Congress writes some laws in such
a confusing manner that it is impossible to determine what is required
and what is not in regard to compliance. Just as Clinton argues whether
"is" is "is" and vehemently asserts that "fellatio"
is not "sex," so does the hopelessly vague and unconstitutional
Internal Revenue Code cause intelligent people to argue such apparent absurdities
as whether a Philadelphia-born inhabitant of Pennsylvania is a resident
citizen of the United States. And, anyone who has challenged the tyrannical
IR code understands how cruelly our "kinder, gentler government"
punishes any who refuse to "voluntarily comply," whatever that
ridiculous oxymoron really means. American "taxpayers" have
learned on the micro scale that our government will destroy, impoverish,
imprison and annihilate those who refuse to comply no matter how impossible
it is to comply, and no matter if compliance would require an act of fraud.
Saddam's people are about to learn what failure of impossible voluntary
compliance means on a macro scale because big oil is now behind Clinton.
-
- Today, it is reported that several Arab
states support the strike against Saddam. Why is this? First, neighboring
countries are always competitors, so there will be an "us against
them" syndrome in many instances. The second reason is a bit deeper,
far underground where stores of crude oil are untapped.
-
- The Arab states are in economic crisis
because the price of crude is depressed and the supply of oil is vast.
In the worldwide market, shares of oil companies have recently taken huge
hits at the stock exchanges. This has happened because the Asian Tigers
are in recession/depression, and their enormous appetite for oil has been
curbed. These Asian Tigers, whose economic fall we have been told would
have no impact on the "robust" American economy, are about to
sink the U.S., no matter how many lies and wars our governments spreads
or causes. The demand for oil is low, the supply is high, and the price
is falling. Big oil won't tolerate this, and no matter what the cost is
to the world, it will retaliate. Clinton, weakened by sex-scandal, devoid
of military knowledge or understanding, and foolish enough to have planned
a military strike based on a Hollywood satire, is the perfect flunky.
-
- Co-incidentally, the announcement of
military buildup against Iraq immediately sent the oil prices higher.
Is the picture coming clear? Iraq is a huge producer of oil. For seven
years, it has been restricted from selling its oil to the world because
it was not in "voluntary compliance" with the UN inspection teams,
and big oil was doing quite nicely, until the Asian Tigers crashed. A
cynic might suspect that were there an oil shortage during this same seven-year
period, that Iraq would have been found in total "compliance"
according to the UN, and would have been allowed to pump out unending streams
for the hungry world with Bill Clinton's, the UN's, and, most importantly,
big oil's blessings. However, the reverse is true. There is too much oil;
the oil companies are in economic crisis. Saddam's vast oil reserves pose
a danger to those companies, so Iraq must be punished . . . again.
-
- This is not to say that Saddam is blameless.
Far from it. But, in this scene of this tragic play, he is rather like
Goldstein, the arch-villain of Big Brother in Orwell's "1984,"
who everyone hated, and must hate, whether he was deserving of it or not.
-
- When Iraq's oil is neutralized, big oil
will not feel the world economic recession as deeply as most groups. So,
after the further destruction of Iraq, there might be a temporary peace
in the region, unless this ugliness gives immediate birth to World War
III. When the world-wide depression grows deeper, which it must given
the inertia behind it, then yet another Arab state will learn the lesson
of Iraq and be forced to quit pumping crude for the collective "good"
of big oil.
-
- The leaders of the various Arab countries
know this is big oil's plan, and clearly see it developing. These same
leaders are so worried about self-preservation and self-interest in this
crashing economic system that is founded upon the absurd belief that "everyman's
greed leads to everyman's good" that they will be as greedy as necessary
to survive . . . and then some. That is why Arabs will fight Arabs . .
. Muslims will fight Muslims . . . again . . . for OIL and GREED. This
is pure EVIL, and EVIL will eventually self destruct.
|
