MAIL about WHS's Theory of Aryan Origins And Kinship
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 1996 22
Dear Sir,
I found your intriguing work invaluble to my efforts in the production of the soon to be released "CELT!", a small book which proves the epigraphy involved with the "transmission" of Aryan knowledge. Replete with photos and graphics, it shows first and foremost that "THE WORD"..."K'LT!" is derived directly from the Hebrew alphabet...in the "code" or "cypher" arrangement which is called "Cabala" or "Ath-Bash" ( a letter- substition scheme)...the alphabet is divided into halves... "Beauty & Bands"...and the resultant array produces the four (4) end-letters which "say"......"K'LT!"
From the introduction we procede to the Greek and Celtic gold coins of European Antiquity showing the use of square Hebrew, Roman and Greek lettered inscriptions such as "KABALA"! and ...KELTADOU. These have their corroboratives in Macedonia Lebanon-Syria and southern Spain, but in "Phoenician".
The much later British and by this we mean Cumberland Celt are ever so expressive in the revealment of little known connections which the Isle of the Mighty once shared with Megalithic Greece of the pre-Metonic self- adjusting lunar calendar which for the purposes of religious secretism had to be gently laid aside (please see "CYCLOS PRYTANNIQUES" by Reduard Montgreassi du Liaorz, PARIS 1849)
Expected publication is early 1997-
Thanks again,
WALTER SOUTHERD
Stewart's reply:
A few centuries after the Hamitic Cush (who expanded Canaanite civilization into Mesopotamia) invented writing, Semite herdsmen enslaved them and learned about writing from them.
Canaanites searching the fertile crescent for arable land had also expanded civilization into Egpyt, which grew so rich that a few centuries later these Semitic (Chaldeans, etc., including the Hebrew tribe) herdsmen of cattle and Hamites enslaved Egyptians (who called these Semites "Hyksos"). After Amosis 1st drove out the Semites who had enslaved and oppressed Egypt for so many centuries, Hyksos fell upon Canaan, which had been weakened by being the war zone in which the Hamitic Hittites had fought against Hyksos Egypt. The extermination and enslavement of Canaanites by the Semites which fled Egypt has been documented in a self-serving way by the Hebrews who wrote the Torah. Was the alphabet called Hebrew indeed Hebrew, and was its use by those Semites conquered any evidence of their having been "semitic"?
I thank Mr. Southerd (above) for his kind words and letting me know I helped someone find the lost trail of our Aryan and Keltic ancestors, something I wish more of our race would help us do. I hope he will email me as soon as his book is published. My purpose in writing my "Theory of Aryan Origins" was to help others interpret their data.
The more specialists find my ideas useful in understanding the truth about their own fields, the more likely my apostate ideas will be accepted and appreciated, and the truth known. Even if my theories create a scientific revolution, Will anyone ever give me any credit?
Stewart's reply:
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996
To: ffox@
Re: migration to America
Thank you for your inquiry. I am not an expert on DNA, but my
impression is that the scientists are still trying to interpret
the data available, and need direction to discover how to
interpret some of the data, which is why I created my page,
hoping to help in that process. Many disciplines are involved in
interpreting the DNA, and what it says about our ancestors and
their migrations, etc. >Sir: Do you have any comment on the
Mormon assertion that some American >Indians originated from
Palestine area (now referred to as Lamanites, who >survived
after killing off the Nephites). Any usage of DNA typing in >your
tracings? >Thanks, Frank I have never heard of this Mormon
assertion, but have some Mormon kinfolks, who have helped out
very much with the genealogy of my ancestors, some of whom were
early Mormons. Do you think there are people who have instinctive
knowledge of their ancestors, and know intuitively what
scientists may not? I would appreciate hearing from you again and
any comments you have on my page, which I have been updating
today. Did you read the whole thing? How did you find out about
my page? I have noticed that it has been getting more visits
lately, and wonder why. Sincerely, STEWART
Stewart's reply:
I thank my critics at Harvard University fcr directing readers to my URL. As for their critique of certain statements contained in my "Theory of Aryan Origins", I hope the following excerpts from "A History of the Jewish People" published by Harvard University Press , copyrighted in 1969 in Tel Aviv, and translated into English in 1976 (1170 pages, a real bargain at $18.95!) will help persuade them, whether or not they apologize and withdraw their brash and fallacious accusations. Must the goddess of life, striving to secure our truth and light, plunge her way through Harvard's (dark and filthy?) mikvahs?
Stewart's reply:
Date: Oct 30, 2004
To: Brehas2@
AryanReligion
Dear Sir, I thank you for your interest in my "Theory of Aryan Origins", and kind criticism. Your response has caused me to wonder how completely, carefully or thoughtfully you read it.
By "Indo-Europeans originated from the Steppes of Russia", do you mean that the ancestors of Indo-Hittites (Indo-Europeans) never emigrated from Africa? What other land route from Africa was there except via the Fertile Crescent?
What do you think of "THE PHOENICIAN ORIGIN OF THE BRITONS, SCOTS & ANGLO-SAXONS" by L.A.Waddell (at http://www.jrbooksonline.com/pob/pob_ch01.html )? Was the cross (swastika) a written symbol for the sun, which was itself a symbol of LIFE (the basic God of all Hamitic religions, including those of ancient Egypt)?
Was mummification preferred in the arid Fertile Crescent (and Sahel), where fuel was less abundant? Was the cremation of corpses conceived because mummification was impossible in more humid regions?
Fire has also been an Aryan symbol of the sun (bonfires are still burnt in Ireland): was fire considered a less corrupt way of disposing of loved ones than burial in dark graves, or consumption by birds, sacred scarab or other insect larvae? Is Zorastrianism as much an Aryan religion as Hinduism?
After the Hyksos (Hebrew, Arab, etc.) conquests, in order to distinguish themselves from Semitic savages, did Hamitic refugees from the Fertile Crescent begin to refer to themselves according to their civilized religion, "Aryan" (from "Aliyan", meaning "the Lord"), instead of according to their former geographic nation/homelands (eg. "Amorites", "Hittites", etc.) in Canaan, etc.?
According to the Bible, Abraham's religion differed from that of his father Terah (who was from "Ur of the Chaldees") after he and other nomadic Hyksos herdsmen invaded and conquered Hamitic Egypt 4000 years ago. Did these Semitic savages corrupt the first civilized religion into what became Judaism, Christianity and Islam?
Whether it has a name or not, is a real religion the instinctive or customary behavior (whether savage or civilized) of each unique race?
Is civilization any individual who instinctively respects his neighbor's property and other personal rights (not just those of his own kinsmen or tribe)?
Sincerely, WHS
P.S. From http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=indo-hittite
1) In·do-Hit·tite - The Indo-European language family
considered from the viewpoint that Proto-Indo-European as
traditionally reconstructed is the sister and not the ancestor of
Anatolian. The hypothetical parent language of Indo-European and
Anatolian.
Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English
Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin
Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights
reserved.
2) indo-hittite - n : the family of languages that by 1000 BC were spoken throughout Europe and in parts of southwestern and southern Asia [syn: Indo-European, Indo-European language, Indo-Hittite]
From http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=hittite
hittite - n. [From Heb. Khitt[=i]m Hittites.] A member of an ancient people (or perhaps group of peoples) whose settlements extended from Armenia westward into Asia Minor and southward into Palestine. They are known to have been met along the Orontes as early as 1500 b. c., and were often at war with the Egyptians and Assyrians.
From : Brehas2@
To : williamhstewart
Subject : AryanReligion
Date : Mon, 11 Oct 2004 02:51:18 EDT
Sir, There are three major religions of the world, Islam,
Christianity and Hinduism of which the first two are Semitic in
origin and the latter is Aryan in origin. This religion was
founded by the Indo-Europeans who came to India and it is the
only religion ever established by whites and which was
transformed into what we know today as Hinduism. Your arguments
call for Semitic, Hamitic and other such groups as having
adherents to the Aryan religion. Now, the Aryan religion which
today is practiced only by the Indians or Hindus came to India
along with its symbols such as the swastika, the horse and
chariot. Nowhere, in the Fertile Crescent or North Africa could
the Aryan religion be known or worshipped simply because these
symbols were not familiar to these nations. The swastika came
from the Southern Steppes of Russia thousands of years ago to
India brought there by the IE people. The Semitic people knew
nothing about it in the countries that composed the Fertile
Crescent and that includes Egypt. It was not until 1663 that the
Egyptians knew of the horse and chariot brought there by the
Hyksos and the swastika did not enter Egypt until the Graceo-Roman
period. Hence, your arguments of the Aryan religion being known
to these countries is flawed and false. The Indo-Europeans
originated from the Steppes of Russia and they came with the
latest technology such as shafted swords and battle axes made of
bronze, they brought the trident, the chariot, the wheel and a
new method of warfare. Then, there is last but not least the Indo-European
rite of cremation still being the custom in India. Nowhere, in
the African world or the Semitic countries do they perform the
rite of cremation since this is considered a taboo in the culture
of these countries. This rite of cremation among Indo-European
peoples and the swastika are the two defining symbols which
distinguish the Indo-European people and their culture from the
Semitic and African world. Thus, your articles and writings in
which you attempt to show or attempt to connect the Indo-European
or Aryan origins with other non Aryan peoples have no substance.
The symbols are evidence of such distortions.
From: Tony DeMartile <solesalon@>
To: whs
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 22:50:00 -0800
Subject: Thank you
Hello! I appreciate your research and theories. A practicing
clairvoyant, spiritual healer and ritualist fo the last ten years,
I intuit my psychic abilities and spiritual beliefs stem entirely
from the essence or nature of my Aryan/Kelt heritage. I am
currently researching this in depth in a graduate program in San
Francisco. Please keep me posted of any more findings and your
book(s). I will certainly give your work credit. I am called to
your ideas...
J. MacMillan
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 22:39:11 -0800
From: "HARRY BAISDEN" hbaisden@
To: whs
Subject: Regarding the word slav/slave
Doesn't the word slave come from the word slav instead of slav
from slave?
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 15:51:15 GMT
From: "joel howells" joelbhowells@
To: whs
Subject: Apologies
Dear WHS. I apologise for coming to my conclusions without thinking carefully about what you said about the Aryan race.
Since I sent the e-mail criticisng your views I had already come to this conclusion before I read it in your reply.
I realised that there could well have been a race in Europe in a similar way to that of the Britons, Celts, Picts, Slavs etc. I hurried into criticisng you but know I realise how silly I was. I apologise for branding you an anti semitic racist.
Joel L. Jackson (15)
From: "joel howells" joelbhowells@
To: whs
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 15:01:24 GMT
Subject: I have serious doubts as to your aryan theory.
The aryan race is a concept dreamed up by a murderous madman while in prison in Germany. This man Adolf Hitler (you might have heard of him) killed six million Jews between 1936 and 1945. The aryan supremacy theory is fantastical and fanatical rubbish that died with in 1945 with Adolf Hitler.
If you read 'Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection' you would understand what I am talking about.
I am a methodist myself but having lost three generations of Jews and six of my Russian ancestors (as prisoners of war) on my Grandfather's side to Auschwitz, Treblinka and Belsen I am angered and upset by your views being put on the net for children such as myself to see.
I can only conceive you as an anti Semite, a racist and an intolerant ignorant man.
Joel L. Jackson age 14. Joelbhowells@
From: "Herman Broxton, Jr.hbjj" hbjjr@
To: whs
Subject: Aryan History
Sir, after reading your comments about the Aryan's history, I want say that it was a lot to digest and sort out. However, I want to say that you seem to be onesided on your interpertation of history. History has been written and mainly interperted from a Eurocentric prospective, even the interpertation of the bible has been from a Eurocentric prospetive. Everything seems to be onesided. There has been information changed, because it does not always support an idea or a certain view. I don't know why a lot of vital information on the history of other races is not mainstream like the Europeans'. Whites have an advantage over the other races when it comes to their history. Most of your historians are white. So everything is going to be white.
From : "LEI" <lei.talk@
To : williamhstewart
Subject : your Theory
Date : Mon, 18 Oct 2004 04:36:06 -0700
I offer much respect for the deep integration of your apparrently polymathic erudition.
In response to your question: I stumbled across your Theory by typing "hamite" into msn's search-engine.
I should have found your pages years ago. I have done much web-searching on many of the topics that your Theory encompasses without finding your pages.
That suggests to me that you need more links to your pages.
The, relatively, low number on your hits-counter (considering the subject of your Theory) indicates the same conclusion.
Thank you for your time and patience.
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 13:45:19 -0400
From: Jan Eric Willemsen odinsson@
To: whs
Subject: Berbers
Greetings, I read your article re: origins of race and found it quite impressive.
I have an interesting story. I was a Merchant Mariner for several years.
I travelled the Earth extensively, interacting at one time or another with members of virtually every race on the planet. I am a large (6'2,230lb), very Red bearded and blond haired man and my natural markings have always seemed to intrigue people especially "asians" and "arabs (who, amazingly, have always shown me respect worthy of a noble even though Im an american)".
My genetic/national origins have been questioned and postulated upon as being so diverse by so many different peoples i.e. they all claimed knowledge of tribes of large blond haired, red-bearded peoples originating virtually everywhere that humans are known to have ever colonized.
During one phase of my life, I let my beard grow ungroomed except combing for about two years. It is thick and full and very reddish orange in color. During crew change aboard one ship back in '88, an arab messman, from yemen, had signed on board. We met in the hallway and upon seeing my countenance the little fellow literally freaked out! He stumbled and started spouting something in arabic and gesturing as though he feared my attacking him. The other messman, an arab from jordan and a fairly decent fellow, calmed him down and introduced us. I presumed this mans fear to be relative to the politics of the day, but when the jordanian messman and I discussed the incident later, he offered an explanation I would never have considered and had not thought of again until reading your article.
He explained that the yemeni messman had mistook me for a "Berber". I chuckled at the notion of redhaired bedouin, but he insisted that an ancient nomadic peoples whose looks are almost identical to my own still roamed the deserts of North africa as they had for time immemorial. He then offered up a very non-semitic explanation of the advancement of civilization amazingly similar to your own, lacking only in quantitative research. He spoke these words in such a way as to make me think, in retrospect, that this knowledge was something handed down to him by word of mouth from his ancestors who keep the passage verbal so as to avoid persecution by their masters. This had to be the case (or something similar) as the man lacked the education to compose this elaborate theory on his own.
Thank you for your work. Harvard be damned!
Sincerely, J.E. Willemsen
From: Lamont Mohammed z00723@
To: whs
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 14:51:14 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Edger Servier Cox and White America.
I am looking for a website that has published historical works concerning race and civilization by Edger Servier Cox and his contemporaries. I have read one such book - White America, and another by one of his contemporaries. I seem to have lost the soft copies of such works and my hard copies were destroyed by someone else. Will you please send me such hyperlinks, if you have them ?
I think it is only fair for me to say that I am not a Christian, and I am not white. And in my experience White people, especially White Christian pride advocates tend to be more hostile to me than other groups. In my experience, non-whites like blacks, and non-Christians like Jews seem to find my company more attractive than the White Christian.
However, I will say that if White Christians think that they are so much more righteous than me, then it would be to their credit for me to read such aforementioned type writers and works that would prove how right they are.
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 19:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: td tomatogangster@
To: williamhstewart
Subject: Evidence Britons Were In The US In The 6th Century
I found this article kind of interesting:
"Evidence Britons Were In The US In The 6th Century"
By Tim Matthews TMMatthews99@aol.com www.kingarthur-online.co.uk
8-25-2000
"It's proof of Prince Madoc in America circa 560," say leading British and US historians.
A team of leading independent historians and researchers announced today that Radio Carbon dating evidence, and the discovery of ancient British style artefacts and inscriptions in the American Midwest, provided, "the strongest indications yet" that British explorers, under the Prince Madoc ap Meurig, arrived in the country during the 6th Century and set up colonies there.
Research team members have known the location of burial sites of Madoc's close relatives in Wales for some time, it emerged today; they have decided to break their self-imposed silence in order that their research be fully known and understood. DNA evidence could provide vital new leads, they say.
TRANSATLANTIC EFFORT
"We have a mass of remarkable evidence," said British historian Alan Wilson, who has been working with Jim Michael of the Ancient Kentucke Historical Association since 1989. "As experts in ancient British history, we were approached by Jim and visited locations in the Mid West with him," he added.
BAT CREEK MOUND
Many of the grave mounds found in the American mid West, including those at Bat Creek, Tennessee, are ancient British in origin and design, Wilson said. Jim Michael added, "the stone tablet found at Bat Creek in 1889 included an inscription written in Coelbren, an ancient British alphabet known and recorded by historians and bards down the ages." Wilson said that his research had brought him into contact with very similar alphabet inscriptions in Britain, Europe and the Middle East. "The components of the alphabet derive from the earliest days of the Khumric (Welsh) people," he added, "and were used along their migration routes to Wales in antiquity."
A MADOC INSCRIPTION
Wilson's research partner, Baram A. Blackett, said, "once we discovered the cipher for the alphabet in recorded in texts dating to the 1500s we knew we were in business. We have translated many of these inscriptions and they all make perfect sense." Jim Michael commented that the final translation for the Bat Creek tablet was an exciting business, "especially when we knew it read, 'Madoc the ruler he is'."
THE MADOC 'LEGEND'
Some historians have written off the evidence for Prince Madoc, the Welsh Prince who sailed to America circa 562 (AD). "They often give a false date of 1170 and this legend has replaced the facts," added Wilson. "At the moment, there is a small group of wreckers trying to steal our research and to promote this misdating. Luckily, we've done all the groundwork and have a substantial body of evidence in our favour."
ACADEMICS SLOW TO RESPOND
"In Britain and America the academics have been slow to respond," said Jim Michael. "There is a theory that there was no European settlement here before Columbus, despite the evidence, but this is for political and theoretical reasons." In the UK, public bodies had, "failed to engage with this vital research effort," added Alan Wilson. "I think they're afraid that an independent group such as ours has made such progress. They prefer to ignore and neglect ancient British history rather than to deal with it. The Welsh people have suffered, and the opportunity to boost the economy, to bring thousands of jobs to Glamorgan and Gwent, where Madoc and his brother Arthur ll ruled, has not been exploited."
Public bodies in the US and UK must now start to actively pursue this new evidence. DNA profiling could help identify the human remains found at Bat Creek. "It could well be Madoc himself," said Blackett. "After all, the inscription was found right next to the bones, which are currently housed at the Smithsonian Institute in Washington DC." Wilson, Blackett and their research team know the location of Madoc's close relatives and have made significant archaeological finds at sites nearby. "So we can use Welsh DNA evidence from the graves here, and compare it with the bone fragments in the Smithsonian," he said. "This would be of massive historical value." It is estimated that up to 20,000 jobs and hundreds of millions in tourism could be an immediate benefit in South Wales, claimed the men.
"In the American Mid West the results could be very similar," added Jim Michael.
IN BRIEF
Wilson, Blackett, and Jim Michael made the identification of the Bat Creek main tumulus as the likely tomb of Prince Madoc, in January 1990. Michael has been in contact with the Smithsonian with a view to its allowing the bone fragments to be DNA tested. - There are numerous ancient British Coelbbren inscriptions in the American mid West. - Skulls found in some US grave mounds are of European-Caucasian origin; they do not include an Inca bone. - There was only one Prince Madoc. He was the brother of King Arthur ll and lived during the 6th Century. This is not in doubt. Ancient British manuscripts and genealogies tell us this.
ENDS."
Alan Wilson and Baram Blackett
They have been investigating the true history of King Arthur and the Khumric-Welsh dynasty for a total of nearly 70 years. Wilson's interest began in 1956 and Blackett joined him in 1976, when the Arthurian Research Foundation of Great Britain was started.
They have written the best-selling The Holy Kingdom (Bantam, 1999) with Adrian Gilbert and self-published underground classics including Arthur, King of Glamorgan and Gwent, Artorius Rex Discovered, Arthur and the Charters of the Kings and Arthur, The War King (a historical novel).
The men have lectured extensively in the UK, including Manchester and Jesus Colleges at Oxford University, and Alan Wilson gave the prestigious Bemis Lecture in Boston in 1993. Wilson and Blackett were also commissioned to produce a detailed genealogy of the Bush family by former President George Bush (senior).
http://www.crichtonmiller.com/
The Working Celtic Cross By Crichton E M Miller
In 1997 Crichton Miller made an astounding discovery that will change our concepts of the historical and religious past forever. Crichton's background and life experiences play a fundamentally important part in this revelation; he is a qualified yachtsman and navigator with an interest in ancient history and religions.
Through the results of intensive research, Crichton proposes that our present system of beliefs and science was inherited from ancient mariners that sailed the oceans of the world in prehistory. He further proposes that the abrupt end of the last ice age, 12,500 years ago, was part of a cataclysm that destroyed of a large part of the flora and fauna of Earth. The most likely humans to survive this cataclysmic event were those who were at sea.
Crighton proposes that the event likely produced a tsunami (a large wave that travels extremely fast) and that such a large tsunami would be more easily survived at sea, where the effect would be limited to a large swell on the surface of the ocean. The effects of a large tidal wave on a coastline, however, would be horrendous. The giant wall of water would have been turned into a breaking wave as it reached shallower depths, annihilating all before it as it rushed up the beach with churning debris.
Crichton suggests that the sea level around the globe rose with the melting ice caps. Archaeological evidence of earlier civilizations is almost impossible to find since it is now below 300 feet of new sea water which changed the topography of coastlines, where most advanced civilizations were based. However Crichton proposes that there is other evidence of earlier civilizations and that this evidence has been left intact in stone and myth for us to decipher.
Crichton believes that these pre-cataclysmic civilizations were maritime based. These ancient sea-going people had developed a form of geometry and mathematics that was linked to astronomy and astrology and developed out of their nautical lifestyles. To successfully travel on the world's oceans and seas, you must be able to know your position and direction.
Navigators recognized that the Sun was directly overhead at mid-day. To find the longitude (East and West position) these navigators had to know the approximate time, both locally and at a prime meridian (an arbitrary North-South line from which the plotted position would be calculated). Today the prime meridian is at Greenwich (0 degrees longitude), but Crichton proposes that the original prime meridian was at Giza in Egypt from which all local times and distances were calculated.
If this is true, this theory could explain the observed similarities in structures and astronomical orientations in many locations all over the Earth. Crichton proposes that these locations as watch stations. This network of astronomically aligned structures has long been investigated, but in the face of no real evidence, the similarities of these global sites is deemed coincidental.
Many investigators and writers have commented on various bits and pieces of evidence that could not be explained. Explorers have brought volumes of information to the public attention. This information has only deepened the sense of mystery and, in some cases, has convinced a large section of the population that aliens must have been involved in these sites. Crichton does not believe that aliens were involved; instead, he prefers to think that we are the aliens because we do not understand the way our ancestors thought and lived.
In his book The Golden Thread of Time [ISBN 0-9541639-0-7], Crichton shows that, in comparison to the ancients, we have become very dualistic and have divorced ourselves from nature and the cosmos. Were this not so, we would be able to see what they left behind quite clearly and our civilizations would not be on the brink of disaster through conflict and the destruction of our environment. To prove his point, he has been fortunate in discovering the instrument that the ancients used to measure the stars and the very planet on which we live.
The Navigation Instrument
This instrument can tell the time, find latitude and longitude, measure the angles of the stars, predict the solstices and equinoxes and measure the precession of the equinoxes. The instrument can also find the ecliptic pole as well as the North and South poles, it can make maps and charts, design pyramids and henges and, when it is used in combination with these observatory sites, can record and predict the cycles of nature.
What is this ancient icon that all humanity sees daily and does not recognize? It is the cross.
A form of the cross is on all Christian churches and many gravestones; it is in literature and song and can be seen hanging round the necks of the faithful all over the world. The teachers of the Christian faith use it, kneel before it, wear it as part of their raiment and yet they do not recognize it for what it is.
The cross is a maritime treasure trove of wisdom and it was likely a vital tool for constructing and designing the pyramids. Crichton has discovered the remnants of a cross hidden by the House of Amen in the Great Pyramid of Khufu at Giza. This amazing cross is capable of measuring angles to an accuracy of three arc minutes.
Crichton proposes that the cross is much older than the pyramids since it is also responsible for the construction of Neolithic henges in Europe that predate the pyramids by thousands of years. He has also found that this knowledge was rediscovered and kept secret by the Knight Templars and other "secret societies" throughout the Middle Ages.
This great secret probably led to the destruction of the Amerindian civilizations at the hands of the Conquistador when they found them measuring the stars with a form of the cross, called the Staff of Power by the Maya.
To show the comparison of this ancient technology, please look at the photograph of a Celtic cross [pictured on right] in the graveyard of Crichton Churchyard, near Roslyn Chapel in the Scottish borders.
You will see that the cross forms an upright with cross bars set at 90 degrees to each other. In the center of the cross is an object that looks like the hub of a wheel.
According to Crichton, our ancestors never designed things without purpose and the first purpose of using stone, as a medium, is that of preservation. The second consideration the ancients had was to incorporate and preserve important knowledge for their descendants. In keeping with the concept of not casting pearls before swine, they hid esoteric messages in certain images that they carved so that future seekers could find what he or she was ready to understand.
In the present discovery, Crichton proposes that these early stone masons carved a particular object in the ancient cross that closely resembles a wheel and is designed to rotate between cross bars on a hub. If this is the case, as observation seems to confirm, we must then ask why?
Crichton observes that in some of the older crosses, early masons incorporated a serpentine design around the wheel and also made the arms of the cross more wide at the outer edge than on the inner. Why?
The answer to these questions only came to Crichton when he was experimenting with different methods possibly used by the Egyptians to survey the Great Pyramid and align it with the stars. All constructions require preliminary surveying. The Great Pyramid was an enormous undertaking of civil engineering. Using the simplest of materials and the accepted mathematical techniques of the Egyptian era, Crichton assembled a theodolite, which could carry out the tasks required.
With the addition of a scale rule and a plumb line, the instrument resembled cross and was extremely accurate, fulfilling the required task and much more.
Not long after his discovery, while carrying out further research, Crichton reviewed the records of the Dixon Relics that were discovered in the North shaft of the pyramid's Queens chamber in 1872. Crichton observed that there were further relics still in the shaft and that these could be seen quite clearly in photographs taken by Rudolph Gantenbrink (1994) with his famous miniature Robot Uphaut 2. Crichton assembled the relics in a logical format and the astounding result was a cross and plumb line of incredible accuracy.
This artifact is capable of measuring all possible angles. Coupled with sufficient astronomical knowledge, it reveals how the ancients kept time and measured the stars, the position of the Sun, Moon, planets and how they used these measurements to sail the oceans of the world.
Crichton has discovered and published this rich source of understanding in his book The Golden Thread of Time [ISBN 0-9541639-0-7]. Many of these revelations have never been seen by the public before and are a must see for those who seek truth and understanding. To further make his point be taken seriously, Crichton Miller applied for a patent on the cross and plumb line and the patent was finally granted in November 2000 as an "astronomical, surveying and navigational instrument" by The British Patent Office. The result of this patent is the instrument you see below. As you can see, it is a faithful representation of the Celtic cross in (Figure 1).
This resurrected version of the cross is made so that modern people may understand it and compare it with the cross (in figure 1) or with any Celtic cross in any part of the world. The working cross is marked in degrees round the edge and the wheel spins freely on a hub. The cross arms are perforated with viewing holes to allow the observer to read the angles. The bottom of the wheel is weighted so that it will always point to the center of the earth. The scale around the outer edge of the wheel runs from 0 degrees at the bottom to 90 degrees clockwise and anti clockwise, so that horizontal measurements can be taken in any direction through the viewing holes.
You can see the advantages of this instrument immediately when you look at the photograph below of an observer measuring the angle of the sun as it rises in the east at dawn. As the world spins round, the sun appears to rise from the horizon and its angle of ascent may be read from the scale directly. This angle changes, as the seasons progress throughout the year, and time and place may be determined from the results of observing stars, planets and constellations.
Crichton considers himself fortunate to have discovered the gift of the cross and to be able to pass this information to his fellow man. According to Crichton, "The cross should be completely understood by as many as possible, for it was the foundation of the very roots of ancient civilization, wisdom and understanding." Crichton believes that, in these current, dangerous and confused times, we could do well seeking some deeper knowledge of what our ancestors knew and begin to enjoy the hope and healing that such knowledge brings. Crichton's website explains much more about his discoveries. His publishers also have a website where a synopsis of his book, The Golden Thread of Time can be read and the book ordered through a secure server.
From: wdw billwall@
To: whs
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 02:36:35 -0500
Subject: Thoughts from a reader
I've been reading your treatise on the origin of races. I submit that Shem is Israel (Aryan), Ham (I believe you are correct) and Japheth is in Russia and otherwise strewn about. Shem is now in America , Canada, Britain, Western Europe, South Africa, Iceland and Australia. I don't subscribe to the conventional theory of evolution which I believe is ludicrous. Phenotype recapitulates genotype or it doesn't. You can at least determine the dominant characteristics and now with all the advances in the human genome, all possible variations. I maintain that the only evolution an organism will ever see is already in the organisms genetic code. Therefore, even though we may only differ genetically from all other humanoids by .01%, that number doesn't as much show our likeness as it does define and insurmountable barrier!
Any thoughts? thanks for reading
From: AKIR30O0AD@
To: whs
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 03:50:57 EDT
Subject: Study
i don't know if you have any knowledge of the bible, but canaan
was the fourth son of ham (kham) and was cursed with leprosy as
spoken about in leviticus and joshua 5 tells us that the spirit
of the lord no longer dwelt with the canaanites (watch out for
those innovations called revised editions that have changed this).
if the spirit of the lord does not dwell with them, then they can
only be opposite to the lord and that is the devil. Furthermore,
aryan is sanskrit for noble and has nothing to do with race
according to the ancient sanskrit scriptures, that was an
invention of a european like yourself. Also "blacks"
have dominant genes while "whites" have recessive genes,
you know like the little white lab mice. Its time you devils stop
lying and just accept that you all were civilized by us, the
egyptians, the sumerians, the indians, the arabs, etc... all of
which were originally "black".
From: anju jolly anju@
To: whs
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 12:13:56 -0700
Subject: Himites migrating to India
I have suspected for a long time that hamites were the ones
who traveled and became the ancestors to the Dravidians in India.
These were people not necessarily of dark (african color). They
were of the the color of present day indians. I also believe that
some of them in India were responsible for the Harrapa and
Mohanjo-daro civilizations. There must have been more migration
after the first families which were the so called the Aryans. I
do not believe that Dravidians were dark and Aryans were light
and the racial theory as such. In essence I think that migration
started in those early days continued for many centuries.
Dr. A. Jolly
From: "James Cox" jcox7736@
To: whs
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 00:12:03 -0400
Subject: Drivvel
Hi, Please state your academic qualifications that would support your work. Any opinion less than at least a Masters from a accredited University is unacceptable and falls under the category of "unenlightened opinion".
From: "Keshav Jeyamohan" keshavjeyamohan@
To: whs
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 17:15:24 WST
Subject: A Question
Dear Sir, I would much appreciate if you could answer the following question for me (it may seem a bit too general);
Are Indians Aryan? (I know about the many different casts, low cast and high cast, but does the higher cast have Aryain blood)
I know that this question might seem a bit ignorant, but I would like to know an experts opinion on the subject matter.
Yours sincerely, Keshav Jeyamohan
P.S Hindu priest still read Sanskrit
0e23
To: keshavjeyamohan
Dear Sir,
Thank you for visting my web site and for writing me May 23, 2000 about whether higher caste Indians have Aryan blood.
I suspect that the orgiginal Aryans were more closely related to the original Dravidian race than they were to Semites and many European races, particularly those of southern Europe.
I am no expert, especially about India, but suspect that, no matter what their caste, almost all descendants of the native families of India have some Aryan blood after having for thousands of years lived in the same geographic area and shared the same culture, etc., with Dravidians.
Do lower caste Indians differ genetically from higher caste Indians? Whether master or slave, once geograhpic boundaries crumble, even caste systems seem unable to control humanity's sexual instincts.
Do blued eyed blond Aryans still live in isolated regions of the mountains of northern Kashmir and India?
The relatively intelligent, hard working, industrious, law abiding and good neighborly behavior of Indians seems more like that of Aryans, but many ignorant Americans often mistake dark skinned Indians for more savage races.
Yours sincerely, WHS
From: "Sam Tuffour" rstuffour@
To: whs
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 06:09:44 -0400
Subject: Ethiopians
Did the Ancient Ethiopians look the same way as the modern Ethiopians look today? Did all the peoples of "negro" Africa (Zulus, Hutus, Tutsis, Xhosas, Ashantes, Etc) all live in Africa during the Ancient Times.
From: "SHEDRICK PARKMOND" FATMANP@
To: whs
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 04:27:48 -0500 (EST)
Subject: YOU ARE A FOOL!
I DO NOT UNDERSTAND YOU WHITE GENTILES. WHY CAN'T WHITE PEOPLE READ THE BIBLE CORRECTLY. NOAH DID NOT CURSE HAM, HE CURSED CANAAN. WHY CAN'T YOU GENTILES GET THAT PART OF THE BIBLE CORRECT. IF NOAH'S CURSE WAS PLACED ON ALL OF HAM'S SONS, WHY DID GOD BESTOW FAVOR ON NIMROD. YOUR WEB SITE HAS SO MANY FLAWS. HAM WAS BLACK AND SO WERE HIS SONS YOU NUT! CUSH, MIZRIAM, PHUT AND CANAAN WERE BLACK.
IF NEGROES ARE NOT HAMITES WHAT ARE WE? AND IT'S FUNNY HOW YOU KEEP COMPARING BLACK PEOPLE TO MONKEYS AND APES.
IF YOU HAD ANY SENSE YOU WOULD KNOW THAT WHITE PEOPLE ARE CLOSER TO MONKEY AND APES. BLACK PEOPLE DO NOT CARRY LICE AND FLEAS LIKE YOU ALL DO.
DID YOU EVER WONDER WHY GOD LET YOUR (ARYAN) ANCESTORS CRUCIFY JESUS?
HAVE YOU EVER THOUGHT ABOUT WHY GOD IS GOING TO ALLOW THE ANTI-CHRIST TO COME OUT OF YOUR WHITE GENTILE RACE?
I'LL TELL YOU WHY. IT IS FOR THE SAME REASON HE DID NOT ALLOW (SOLOMON) TO MARRY GENTILE (WHITE) WOMEN IN THE OLD TESTAMENT. WHY IS IT THAT JEHOVAH CHANGED (ABRAM)'S NAME TO (ABRA+HAM). HAM'S SONS HAD MANY NATIONS FROM WEST TO EAST FROM SOUTH TO THE NORTH. AND ABRAM CAME DOWN TO EGYPT, HE DID'NT GO TO GREECE OR SCOTLAND. SOLOMON HAD SONS BY BLACK WOMEN.
THE FIRST BORN CHILD BY ABRA-HAM WAS A HALF (HAMITE) AND HALF (SEMITE). YOU KNOW ABOUT THIS YOUR NOT STUPID. SOLOMON WAS HALF (HAMITE) AND HALF(SEMITE). AND NOT TO MENTION THAT HIS FIRST BORN SON WAS A 95% BLACK DUE TO THE FACT THAT SOLOMON WAS 50% (HAMITE) AND QUEEN OF SHEBA WAS 100% (HAMITE). AND THIS GOES THE SAME FOR ISHMAEL ABRA-HAM'S FIRST BORN.
I HAVE A LOT MORE THAT YOU PROBABLY CAN'T HANDLE RIGHT NOW.
WRITE BACK SOON BECAUSE THOSE( GENTILE PROPHETS) YOU HAVE BEEN LISTENING TO HAVE FILLED YOUR HEAD WITH WORLDY DOCTRINE .(CHARLES DARWIN) WRITE BACK. DON'T BE AFRAID.
thank you
From: rstuffour@
To: whs
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 22:04:52 -0500
Subject: africans
Did all the black african groups (ashantis,hausa, zulus,etc.) exist in africa during the ancient times? Did the ancient ethiopians look the same way that they do today?
From: Kurt Gorsetman kgorsetm@
To: whs
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 02:23:53 -0600
Subject: Evolution
Hey, we all came from the same species. Case closed!
From: "RO Sherr" sherrro@
To: whs
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 18:06:45 GMT
Subject: The Kurds
The Kurds have always acknowledged their ancestors as 'ARYAN' yet
many people still mix them with arabs and Turks from whom they
are very distinct, your site make this distinction clear - Thank
you very much for your efforts,Roni Sherdan
From: Kim Martin Metzger kmetzger@
To: whs
Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 12:14:11 -0600
Subject: Race
Hello Mr. Stewart,
I enjoyed reading your article on race. I have been trying for a
long time to get information on racial differences between
negroids and other races, but it seems that anthropologists don't
want to acknowledge the concept of race anymore. I was wondering
if you could point me to a website where I could find information
such as the differences in brain size of negroids and other races.
I'm looking for a reputable scientific discussion.
K. Metzger
From: "Randall Burns" randall_burns@
To: whs
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 10:18:37 PST
Subject: Anthropology
WHS wrote: "According to my apostate and irrefutable? theory, genetic and linguistic, etc. divergence between Aryans, Berbers and Dravidians had begun by about 20,000 years ago and divergence between these and other "White" Eurasian ethnic nations (pre-Aryan races in Europe and Asia, such as the Picts, Basques, Hungarians, Finns, Lapps, Caucasians, Semites, etc.) had begun by about 40,000 years ago."
I think this is interesting and I would be interested in more that you have to say about the Picts (my paternal ancestry is rooted in Scotland - and I've always felt that it is likely that my ancestry included a substantial Pictish component - basically we tend to be quite a bit shorter, more robust, and darker than the "classic" Aryan type).
I suspect that main thing to look at here is simply Y chromosomal DNA - while the frequencies of various genes associated with the Pictish Y chromosome and "Aryan" Y chromosome may differ, I'd suspect that we'd see a lot of overlap at this point.
WHS wrote: "metonyms like "European", or "WHITE", terms which confuse Aryans with some non-Aryan and non-Hamitic Europeans (CroMagnon Basques, etc.), Asians (Semites, Dravidians, etc.) and Africans (Berbers, etc.). Did the names "Scot" and "Briton" evolve from "Catti" or "Khatti"..."
Interesting tidbit here: in Welsh, the term for the people the romans called "Picts" is "Brit".
RJB
From: "AT" OTTO88@
To: whs
Cc: otto88@
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 13:52:22 -0800
Subject: truth
Dear Sir,
I refuse to believe the Judeo-Afrocentric idea that the white
race evolved from the negriod race. The theory I hold as more
realistic is that the Negroid may be the missing link of the ape-monkey
"Lucy" evolution, and a superior extra-terrestrial race
from another part of the universe created the Aryans. As non
conventional as that theory is, what are your thoughts regarding
it.
Thank You for your time. A.T.
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 04:47:31 -0800
From: "Dukhat" jtom@
To: whs
Subject: Aryan Origins
I happened to read a printed version of page one of your
"theory" and it seemed interesting, so I went to your
website, www.geocities.com/Athens/Parthenon/1064, as I read I
began to see a pattern to your hypothesis, namely that the "Aryans"
were victims of Semitic "aggression". Well, if you look
at white history, they almost always did the victimizing. The
horse was not domesticated by Semitic herdsmen, it was
domesticated by the Orientals. The first evidence of farms comes
from Afghanistan, which was then populated by Dravidians. The
"Aryans" that you speak of (i.e. Celts, Germans, and
Scandinavians) were never the forerunners of "civilization",
at best they brought civilization to new lows. I am not a "Semitic"
or a "Mongoloid", I am a Greek-American who disagrees
with your "theory". I also got the feeling you were
implying that "Aryans" from the Mediterranean were
somehow inferior to the "purer" Germanic "Aryans".
When looking at history you must consider one thing, with the
exception of the Greeks, the "Aryan" race was always
behind the Semitic and Asian races in terms of civilization. The
"Aryans" were the herdsmen who terrorized the Middle
East. I do believe the European culture gave much to humanity,
namely Christianity and democracy. I would conclude by saying
that to fully understand the past you must understand it from
many cultures and not use history as a club in today's racial
wars. From a concerned 17-year old
John
2/15/99
From: stewart
To: jtom@
About prejudice, intolerance and racism
Dear John,
You may discard the e-mail I sent you yesterday without reading it, since this is an improved version.
I hope you are well and enjoying a happy Valentine's day.
Thank you for e-mailing me 9 Jan 1999, for your feedback (which may indicate that I expressed myself very poorly or that you did not understand much of what I wrote), and for reading my web site at
<http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Parthenon/1064/>.
Did the person who gave you a printed version of page one of my theory want you to know about the history and origins of your noble ancestors and their outstanding civilization, about which all humanity can be proud? If so, I congratulate you for having a relationship with a person who cares about you so much that he would risk associating himself with my "politically incorrect" theory, and thank him for wanting you to know and understand the truth. Ignorant, dishonest and irrational people often hate the truth.
>>John -> I began to see a pattern to your hypothesis, namely that the "Aryans" were victims of Semitic "aggression".
Would your response to my theory be different if you thought that what I wrote were true? Have you read and do you believe any of Moses' biblical writings I quoted?
Please refer me precisely to anything I wrote relevant to the above issue which you think is not true.
Do you have instincts of honesty and honor which require you to examine facts before judging someone to be mistaken? I try my best to avoid being prejudiced and ignorant about anything.
Would you respond differently if you saw a pattern to someone's hypothesis that "Semites" were victims of Aryan "aggression", and if so why?
>>John -> Well, if you look at white history, they almost always did the victimizing.
Where in my theory did I use the word "victimize" or "white" in reference to any race? Does your definition of "white" include people of Dravidian, Semitic, southern European, mulatto, etc. ancestry? Which race(S) or ethnic group(S) do you consider to be "white"?
By your statement that "whites almost always did the victimizing", do you mean that "Dravidians almost always did the victimizing", or that "Semites almost always did the victimizing" , etc.? If you think Dravidians and Semites are not "white", in which racial category (Negroid, Mongoloid, Australoid, etc) do you think they belong?
Letting others do one's thinking can be confusing.
>>John -> The horse was not domesticated by Semitic herdsmen, it was domesticated by the Orientals.
For the sake of whatever credibility you have, PLEASE tell me where in my theory I wrote the contrary (which race or ethnic group do "orientals" belong to)?
>>John -> The first evidence of farms comes from Afghanistan, which was then populated by Dravidians.
Please tell me the source of your information. I welcome correction because I try to believe only what I think is true.
Does my theory state that our ancient Aryan ancestors were closer kin to Dravidians than they were to non-Aryan European races and Semites?
>>John -> The "Aryans" that you speak of (i.e. Celts, Germans, and Scandinavians) were never the forerunners of "civilization", at best they brought civilization to new lows.
Please explain to me what you mean by putting the word "Aryans" inside quotation marks? Why do you not also put the words Celts, Germans, Scandinavians, Dravidians, Orientals, etc. inside quotation marks?
>>John -> I am not a "Semitic"
By 'I am not a "Semitic"', do you mean that none of your ancestors were Semitic? How many centuries have Hebrews and Arabs (Semites) occupied Greece? Did none of your genes come from the Semitic race? If not Semites, what race do you think your ancestors were?
Is a Christian "Semitic" in anyway if he worships a Jew, emotionally identifies himself as a "Jew by adoption", and believes the scriptures and history of Hebrews are more sacred than all others?
>>John -> or a "Mongoloid"
Has Greece kept Genghis Khan's hoards, Turks and other people of Mongoloid ancestry out of its gene pool?
>>John -> I am a Greek-American
Is someone whose mother had Greek ancestors and whose father had American ancestors what you call "Greek-American"? And is the"American" race not Negroid, Semitic, or Mongoloid, etc.? Who are the racial ancestors of "Greek-Americans" ?
>>John -> who disagrees with your "theory".
I welcome rational disagreement and discussion, and want to know WHAT I wrote that is not true, so please be more specific. Your computer can be used to copy and paste statements from my theory into the e-mail you send me in the same way that I have copied statements you e-mailed me into this letter.
>>John -> I also got the feeling you were implying that "Aryans" from the Mediterranean were somehow inferior to the "purer" Germanic "Aryans".
For credibility's sake, PLEASE quote any statement you read anywhere in my theory that implied (or gave you a "feeling") that I love or value any individual, ethnic group, or race more than I do any other individual, ethnic group, or race. Where have I written words meaning inferior, superior, behind, above, chosen people, etc.?
>>John -> When looking at history you must consider one thing,
MUST I think as you think? When I look at history, I try to consider EVERYTHING relevant. Have I told YOU what you MUST think?
>>John -> with the exception of the Greeks, the "Aryan" race was always behind the Semitic and Asian races in terms of civilization.
By "behind" do you mean that the Aryan race has always been less civilized or INFERIOR to Greeks, Semites and Asian races (but not Negroes, etc.)?
Do you think "Greeks" are or were ever Aryan? Do you think that the Aryans who brought their civilization to Greece and made it the most powerful state in Europe thousands of years ago were less "pure" Aryans than their descendants? Is Greece still the most powerful state on earth, or is that just something Greeks like to tell Turks?
>>John -> The "Aryans" were the herdsmen who terrorized the Middle East.
Do you think that terrorizing other nations is all the Aryan race ever did, and are you prejudiced because you hate all Aryans? Did I write that Aryans never owned cattle or dominated whatever savage race happened to be wherever Aryans fled to?
By "Aryans" do you mean Greek Aryans? Were Greek Aryans terrorists, or peace loving farmers who brought Civilizaton to Europe?
>>John -> I do believe the European culture gave much to humanity, namely Christianity and democracy.
By European culture's "gift to humanity" do you mean the irrational and savage religion whose god ordered his chosen people to dispossess, enslave, and exterminate the civilized Hittite and other Aryan nations of Canaan (according to Moses in Deuteronomy 7, etc.), and Christian imperialists who dispossessed, enslaved, and exterminated many American Indians, Negroes, Muslims and other nations?
According to researchers at the Vatican who study records written during the lifetime of the Jew Christians worship, he was not a gift of European culture but the well cared for nephew of the third richest Jew in the world. The Semitic Jews who began and spread Christianity were neither racially nor culturally European.
My theory cites evidence that the Hamitic Aryan political and clan structure was democratic long before Aryans brought democracy and civilization to Europe. This and previous issues you raised suggest to me that you read carelessly, or not at all, what I wrote.
>>John -> I would conclude by saying that to fully understand the past you must understand it from many cultures
Has what I have written helped you "fully understand the past"?
>>John -> and not use history as a club in today's racial wars.
Is stating the truth the same as using "history as a club"? What race did I "club"? Have I written anything false, disrespectful, hateful, harmful, belligerent, mean, warlike, etc.?
Is your writing that 'with the exception of the Greeks, the "Aryan" race was always behind the Semitic and Asian races in terms of civilization.' and that 'The "Aryans" were the herdsmen who terrorized the Middle East' using history as a club?
Are you as concerned about the dispossession, enslavement and
extermination of the civilized Hittites of Canaan (according to
the word of your Hebrew god) as you are about allegations that
Indo-Hittites (Aryans) victimized Semites?
When it comes to genocide, have you been taught double standards
and racial preferences, or do they come naturally? Should those
who think others' eyes need cleansing first cleanse their own?
I love and respect all people regardless of their ancestry, and hope that CAREFULLY reading, studying and understanding what I have written will help prejudiced and self-hating Aryans to overcome the ignorance they have been taught, and benefit not just Aryans, but all humanity.
After rereading my Theory, a person who had e-mailed me a letter like yours later wrote back to apologize.
Please write again after you read my theory carefully enough to make truthful statements about it.
To "a concerned 17-year old" from a concerned friend,
Sincerely, Stewart
From: Kostantine Lookashow devalois@
To: whs
Subject: Aryan origins
Dear Sir,
At the outset I would like to thank you for giving the opportunity to the people to read your wonderful work about history and origins of Aryans. My occupation is far from history or archeology, however I have been interested in medieval European history. In course of my searches, as it usually happens, I was driven to the very past. Finding your great article I could reconsider many things over that came onto the scene in 5-10th centuries. I have read controversial articles of Indus and Western scientists who are so keen to the principal of equality of the races. I found your work more consistent, profound, and probably closer to the sooth. Perhaps due to my disability to read in English "between the lines", i.e. to understand your sarcasm and guiding questions I have not find answers for some of mine, that I believe are relevant, or otherwise adjacent to mainstream of your article. Could you please give me small hints about the following:
1. Mongoloids have very distinctive features. What happened to the peoples after descending and leaving Africa 70KYA? What was the area of their spread? Could the ancient Indians be a kind of mixture between Aryans and Mongoloids? (The clue for this I got considering Nepali and Northern Indian who look similar to the people of present Ukraine, for instance, that suffered under Huns, Chingyz-Khan and similar mobs for centuries.) Your environmental considerations do not lend to think that they had similar appearance yet living in Africa(?).
2. As I understood both Celts and "German" tribes, having the common well, settled the Europe in different times. What was the reason that they fled Canaan separately? What are the relations (blood) between Celtic peoples and first whites that settled in the Southern Europe? In all the studies Slavs are considered to be Aryans, though Slavonic languages belong to Ugro-Finn group, i.e. these first southern whites; what are the reasons to encompass Slavs as Aryans? Russians (if they existed as a separate tribe at that times) and Goths lived close to each other for a long time; have they got the same Scandinavic origins (Slavonic tongues currently have multitude of words, that I always considered to be solely ancient Slavonic, similar to all the German languages)? If no, who are the Slavs (are they criminals of ancient Nordic-German society, as some sources depicted: Slav-slave)???
3. It was mentioned by you in the article that Aryan religion traditions reflected inherit features of white people such as kindness, sincerity and so on. From the other hand, it was the common practice to sacrifice children (Baal's sacrifice in the Holy Bible), i.e. act ruthless and cruel directed even to their own children and people. As more known fact I refer to the early-medieval Europe (5-6 century) when kings tortured to death or exiled relatives; brother waged war with brother and so on. The time was cruel of course, but was the Aryan religion so keen to bring good to the hearts of the people and purge the evil as Christianity has been supposed to do? Did our common forefathers do carry all that has been proclaimed to be Aryan traditional features through millennia (and thereby allows whites to "spit" on to the other cultures)?
Actually, I have a lot to ask you about, but I really would not want to annoy you with my unprofessional questions.
Anticipating to get the answer.
Yours Truly
Konstantine
From: "Adrian Sandhu" adriansandhu@
To: whs
Subject: ARYA
HELLO: MY NAME IS ADRIAN, I AM A UNIVERSITY STUDENT IN VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA. I FOUND YOUR WORK INTERESTING. I AM OF INDIAN ORIGIN. PUNJABI PARENTAGE TO BE EXACT. WE BELIEVE THAT WE ARE ARYANS. NOT MANY OF US PROFESS IT BUT WE FEEL IT. I CAN TEL YOU FORM PERSONAL EXPERIENCE. WHEN I SEE A SWASTIKA. I FEEL A RUSH OF PRIDE AND ANCIENT FEELINGS RISE WITHIN ME. WHEN I LAST VISITED INDIA I FELT VERY EMOTIONAL LIKE I WAS HOME AFTER THOUSANDS OF YEARS. ANOTHER CASE OF SUCH FEELINGS OCCURRED IN A CITY IN WEST INDIA CALLED BARODA. THERE WHEREVER I LOOKED. I SAW VEHICLES, PEOPLE, STRUCTURES WITH SWASTIKAS ON THEM. HERE IN THE WEST SUCH AN ACT WOULD BE ABHORRED. WHAT A SHAME. IT IS TRAGIC THAT HITLER USED THE SWASTIKA AS A SYMBOL OF NAZISM.
ANYWAYS..ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE VEDIC TEXT RG VEDA? IN IT THERE IS NO MENTION OF AN ARYAN HOMELAND BESIDES PUNJAB (BIRTHPLACE OF SANSKRIT). ONLY IRANIANS MENTION A HOMELAND. SUCH A HOMELAND IS DESCRIBED AS COOL IN CLIMATE WITH MOUNTAINS, TREES AND GAME. I BELEIVE IT IS NOT HE PREPOSTEROUS EUROCENTRIC VIEW OF CENTRAL EURASIA OR THE RUSSIAN STEPPES BUT THE HIMALAYAN FOOTHILLS. AS FAR AS ARYANS BEING FARMERS. AND LAND OWNERS. WE THE MAJORITY OF PUNJABIS CALL OURSELVES JATTS (FARMERS/LAND OWNERS). WE WERE WARRIORS.IN THE PAST AS WELL. (TOILING ON THE FIELD, THEN HEARING THE CRY OF BATTLE THE JATTT WOULD RUN FOR HIS SWORD). WE ARE AKIN TO THE MOSSAE GOTAE (FIERCE MEN WITH TOPKNOTS OF HAIR BRANDISHING SWORDS ON HORSEBACK). IF YOU CAN IMPLEMENT THE RESSURECTION OF AN ARYAN RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY I AM INTERESTED. I PROFOUNDLY BELEIVE THE SACRED HINDU WRITINGS ARE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE OF ARYAN RITES AND BELIEFS. (DID YOU KNOW THAT THE VARNAS OR CLASSES IN VEDIC ARYAN SOCIETY ARE NOT TO DO WITH RACE BUT ARE SOCIAL DIVISIONS TO HELP GREASE THE WHEEL OF SOCIETY - LIKE SOME PEOPLE ARE HOPKEEPERS,PRIESTS, SOLDIERS ETC). HAVE YOU EVER BEEN TO INDIA. I RECOMMEND IT AND IF YOU HAVE THE GOOD FORTUNE OF MEETING A HOLY MAN VERSED IN SANSKRIT. YOU WILL HAVE THE JOY OF A LIFETIME HEARING TALES OF LONG AGO. TAKE CARE
SINCERELY, ADRIAN SANDHU (AN ARYAN JATT )
From: TErvin4358@
To: whs
Subject: my sons e-mail
My apologies. It appears my son read your article none to carefully.
From: TErvin4358@
To: whs@
Subject: the real
You have absolutly no idea how badly you represent caucasions with your illogical unscientific ramblings do you. Your continued ingnorance of actual knowlege about your own genetics baffels me.. considering your front of education.. luclkily you are few and WE!! are many... When you wake up and smell the twentieth century e-mail me back and we"ll chat.... "ERIN GO BRAUGH"!!!!
From: "J. PEPPERS" abcpool@
To: whs
Subject: www.christianseparatist.org
Back to Page One?