ORGONOMY INFO IN NEWSGROUPS
(keywords = orgon, orgone, orgonomy, wr, cloudbusting)
(Deja news search
we thank you)
(Editor note: The messages and items found in this search include negative and positive statements towards orgonomy. Some negative statements demonstrate the one sided and mechanistic view by individuals. Some other statements are broadcasted one liners by those who have never investigated what they have chosen to judge negatively. These negative and unsubstantiated statements are part of what Wilhelm Reich would consider as "the emotional plague of mankind". Some however are just orgonomy information or exchange. We post what we find in the searches. We leave it up to the reader to form their own opinions concerning what we found on the news groups.)
"If one wishes to combat the plague one must expose oneself
to it."
Wilhelm Reich, People In Trouble, pg. 187
Most recent item is listed last. Long items occasionally edited to show only text related to - orgone.
date: 95-09-07aa
Orgon
- Reich
From: gruber2@ib
m.net (Gerhard Gruber)
Date: 1995/09/07
MessageID: 42ndhi$1njp@news-s01.ca.us.ibm.net#1/1
newsgroups: sci.skeptic Could somebody provide me with information reagrding Orgon? To be specifically I'd like to have a list of arguments whats wrong with this theory. Which are the flaws of it? Thank you! by(e), Gerhard W. Gruber fido: 2:310/81.11 email: gruber2@ibm.net Any spelling corrections (and grammar as well for that matter) will be appreciated as email.
Re:
Orgon - Reich
From: Ja
ck Sarfatti <sarfatti@ix.netcom.com>
Date: 1995/09/12
MessageID: 434n6b$k4l@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com#1/1
references: <42ndhi$1njp@news-s01.ca.us.ibm.net> <42qj4n$31mq@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Web Advanced Research Project x-netcom-date: Tue Sep 12 12:31:23 PM PDT 1995 mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: sci.physics x-mailer: Mozilla 1.2b2 (Windows; I; 16bit) gruber2@ibm.net (Gerhard Gruber) wrote: >gruber2@ibm.net (Gerhard Gruber) wrote: > >>Could somebody provide me with information reagrding Orgon? >>To be specifically I'd like to have a list of arguments whats wrong >>with this theory. Which are the flaws of it? > It's not even wrong. Reich was totally delusional at the time. -- Plug in and play with Jack Sarfatti, The Dancing Wu Li Web Master. Join other successful businesses, advertise now on http://www.hia.com/hia/pcr "Blessed are the censors; for they shall inhibit the earth."
From: dpbsmith@world.std.com
(Daniel P. B. Smith)
Date: 1995/09/23
MessageID: DFDIvo.2q3@world.std.com#1/1
references: <43v5jh$o68@inn23b.edaal.ingr.com> organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA newsgroups: rec.radio.noncomm,sci.engr.television.advanced,sci.electronics In article <43v5jh$o68@inn23b.edaal.ingr.com>, <crmaxfie@ingr.com> wrote: In article <43ulu5$ojp@odin.diku.dk>, null@diku.dk (Niels Ull Jacobsen) writes: [...snip...] You're making fun of him when what he needs is good advice. For example it is a well known (scientifically proven) fact that wearing a skull cap made from aluminium foil will prevent your thoughts from being broadcast to all and sundry. What also works well is a plain aluminum or stainless steel colander. Its efficacy is improved if you attach a wire to it of fourteen gauge or heavier, letting the wire dangle on the ground to bleed off the RF energy to ground. This will take care of the electrostatic field component, but you are ignoring orgone radiation, for which you will need alternating layers of aluminum and mineral wool. -- Daniel P. B. Smith dpbsmith@world.std.com
Re: Expert Witness
From: chris@kd3bj.ampr.org (C. T.
Nadovich)
Date: 1995/09/24
MessageID: chris.811949209@kd3bj.ampr.org#1/1
sender: usenet@kd3bj.ampr.org (News Posting Phantom User) references: <43v5jh$o68@inn23b.edaal.ingr.com> <DFDIvo.2q3@world.std.com> organization: The KD3BJ Usenet BBS newsgroups: rec.radio.noncomm,sci.engr.television.advanced,sci.electronics dpbsmith@world.std.com (Daniel P. B. Smith) writes: >In article <43v5jh$o68@inn23b.edaal.ingr.com>, <crmaxfie@ingr.com> wrote: >>In article <43ulu5$ojp@odin.diku.dk>, null@diku.dk (Niels Ull Jacobsen) writes: >> >>[...snip...] >> >>>>> You're making fun of him when what he needs is good advice. For example >>>>> it is a well known (scientifically proven) fact that wearing a skull >>>>> cap made from aluminium foil will prevent your thoughts from being >>>>> broadcast to all and sundry. >>> >>>>What also works well is a plain aluminum or stainless steel colander. >>>>Its efficacy is improved if you attach a wire to it of fourteen gauge or >>>>heavier, letting the wire dangle on the ground to bleed off the RF energy >>>>to ground. >This will take care of the electrostatic field component, but you are >ignoring orgone radiation, for which you will need alternating layers >of aluminum and mineral wool. It's been a while since I designed any orgone energy sinks, but don't you need a much larger gauge drain wire (e.g. #2) that runs directly to a wood/metal "node" submerged in a natural lake. I thought this was the real reason orgone energy has be unable to compete with other technologies --- difficulty in miniturization. -- 73 de KD3BJ SK .. http://www.kd3bj.ampr.org/chri s/ +1 215 257 0635 (voice) +1 215 257 2154 (fax) +1 215 257 2744 (data)
Send information or questions to us orgone@geocities.com.
Comments or suggestions on the page are also greatly appreciated.
Disclaimers, Copyright, and Trademark
Other Great Orgonomy Web Sites
| AORL | DOS | IOO | ORI | PORE | WRM 
|
Many thanks for Geocities providing this free space
Get
your own Free Home Page
