Linguistics
.
. 
source: book
author: Vitaly Shevoroshkin
title: Proto-Languages and Proto-Cultures, Materials from the First International Interdisciplinary Symposium on Language and Prehistory, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Nov. 1988
published: 1990 Universitaetsverlag Dr. Norbert Brockmeyer, Bochum, Germany
.
subject: MANKINDS ORIGIN FROM ONE SINGULAR HOMOGENOUS CULTURE AND FAMILY, 8 PEOPLE ACCORDING TO GENESIS, BIBLE: ALL WORLD LANGUAGES ARE DERIVATES OF ONE PARENT LANGUAGE: p.474
.
'paleo-lexicologists' show that there are significant and widespread resemblances of vocabulary throughout all human languages:
Global studies of language comparision as well as the comparision of ancient languages show that they are derivates of one "mother language". Luingistics are talking about "Eve's Dictionary" even though being spiritually and emotionally attached to the Evolution theory.
.
.
.
GLOBAL RELATIONSHIPS AMONG LANGUAGES: 'NOSE' IN NORWAY = 'NOSE' IN AYMARA, SOUTH AMERICA: p.474-475
The word for 'nose' in the Aymara Language of South America (Hamitic) is 'nasa', which is identical to Norwegian 'nasa' (Japhetic) of the same meaning: Traditional historical linguists assume that Aymara and Norwegian are completely unrelated (blinded scientists). However, the alternate view is that the resemblance may actually point to a distant linguistic relationship, and thus common origin. These two people did not meat one another after the Babel confusion in Mesopotamia. The ancestors of the South American people traveled from Iraq (Mesopotamia) over Siberia/Alaska (Bering Street) to South America while the Norwegian's ancestors traveled over Central Europe to Norway (Scandinavia). However, the word 'nose' has been kept unchanged among both nations, even crosswise among the Hamitc (Negro-Mongolian) and the Japhetic (Indo-European) nations. The word 'nose' could have meant originally 'face' as it is used for in the Korean language (Hamitic) 'nat'= face as well as other Hamitic languages of Europe, Asia and the Americas 'neti', 'neci', 'nici', 'nus'.
.
.
.
source: book
author: Vitaly Shevoroshkin
title: Dene-Sino-Caucasian-Languages, Materials from the First International Interdisciplinary Symposium on Language and Prehistory, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Nov. 1988
published: 1991 UniversitŠtsverlag Dr. Norbert Brockmeyer, Bochum, Germany
.
.
.
subject: ORIGIN OF MANKIND FROM ONE HOMOGENOUS PEOPLE AND CULTURE, 8 PEOPLE ACCORDING TO GENESIS BIBLE: GLOBAL RELATIONSHIPS AMONG LANGUAGES:
(HAMITIC) FAMILY GROUP DISCOVERED NAMED SINO-NA-DENE: INCLUDING:
.
- BASQUE (country between Spain and France)
- ETRUSCIAN (Italy, ancient language)
- SUMERIAN (Iraq/Mesopotamia, ancient Hamitic language)
- SINO-TIBETAN (South East Asia)
- YENISEIAN (Siberia)
- NA-DENE (North America, Native American Indian languages) p.339
 .
Vladimir E. Orel and Sergei A. Starostin (1990) have proposed that Etruscian also be included in Dene-Caucasian, specifically as a stray offshoot of the East Caucasian (Nakh-Daghestan) family. This is no wonder since we know from the Bible (The Old Testament) that some Hamitic people traveled westward also into Europe: Amos 9:7 stating that the Philistines came from Caphtor (Crete). These early Hamitic tribes were probably the first settlers of continental Europe during the Ice Age. These are most likely the (Hamitic) tribes who lived in caves, known as 'Neanderthal Man' between 2,400 and 1,400 BC.
.
.
back to Cover
FREE WEBSITE available at: www.geocities.com