A Comparison of Ridley's Modulator Gain to that of F.D. Tan's Unified Modulator

By Brad Suppanz
3/30/98

Introduction

In 1994, F.D. Tan published his thesis which included an expression for the modulator gain in current mode controlled switched mode power supplies.  Tan's expression differs from the previously accepted equation from Ridley (1991).  This paper highlights the difference between the two expressions in familiar "Ridley nomenclature".  Using Tan's modulator gain equation yields a more accurate representation of the current mode controlled switched mode power supply.

Definitions

Fm, the modulator gain is the ac gain from the error current signal (ic - iL)*Ri to the duty cycle.

Se, the slope of the external compensation ramp in volts/sec at the comparator input.

Sn, the slope of the sensed current ramp in volts/sec at the comparator input.

Ts, the switching period.

Vap, the dc voltage applied between the active and passive terminals of the switch element. Also, the voltage that appears across either switch when it is off.

Ri, the effective volts per amp from the sensed current to the comparator input.

L, the inductance of the converter as seen from the point where current is sensed.

Ridley's Modulator Gain Equation

Fm = 1/{(Se + Sn)*Ts} [duty cycle/volt]

Unified Modulator Gain Equation

Fm = 1/{(Se + Sn - Vap*Ri/(2*L))*Ts} [duty cycle/volt]

The only difference between the two modulator gain equations is in the term:

-Vap*Ri/(2*L)

which can be shown to represent the up-slope (and/or the down-slope) of the sensed current ramp at 50% duty cycle.

Therefore, the Unified modulator's gain goes to infinity, then changes sign as the duty cycle goes above 50% if there is no slope compensation ramp (Se). This is shure to cause instablility, which is in agreement (intuitively) with the familiar known fact that the current loop will go unstable at 50% duty cycle without slope compensation. You can also see how slope compensation allows operation at 50% duty cycle or more without going unstable. However, even with slope compensation, the system will still go unstable at some duty cycle greater than 50%. So, you may be wondering, how does this "extra" term come about?

Derivation

Tan derived his modulator equation from the steady-state waveforms that feed into the comparator and determine the current and duty cycle (shown below).


By looking at these waveforms, one can see that the state-space averaged inductor current will be:

il = ic - d*Ts*Se/Ri - d*Ts*Sn/(2*Ri)

where,

il is the state-space averaged inductor current

ic is the commanded inductor current

d is the duty cycle

That is, the inductor current will be less than the commanded value due to the slopes Se and Sn and the time d*Ts.

Next, note that:

Sn = (1 - d)*Vap*Ri /L

so that

il = ic - d*Ts*Se/Ri - d*Ts*(1 - d)*Vap /(2*L)

Small signal information can be derived by perturbation, which yields

Dil = Dic - [Se/Ri + (1-2*D)*Vap/(2*L)]*Ts*Dd - [D*(1-D)*Ts/(2*L)]*Dvap

(Where capital letters denote DC (steady-state) quantities, and "D" precedes AC (perturbed) quantities.)

Solving for Dd,

Dd = 1/{(Se + Sn - Vap*Ri /(2*L))*Ts}*Ri*{(Dic - Dil) - [D*(1-D)*Ts/(2*L)]*Dvap}

From the above, we can see that the modulator gain,

Fm = Dd/{(Dic - Dil)*Ri}

is given by

Fm = 1/{(Se + Sn - Vap*Ri /(2*L))*Ts}

This completes the derivation.
 



Return to SMPS Notes Index


© Copyright 1998 Brad Suppanz. All rights reserved.
Links to this page are encouraged.
Email comments and suggestions to:


Sign Guestbook
View Guestbook
View My OLD Guestbook from before Jan 2001
Written 3/30/98
Last updated 7/20/04
Number of hits: Counter