Project for the Improvement of Child Support Litigation Technology

This page was created on October 4, 1999
Last changed on January 22, 2003

Roger F. Gay, Project Leader
roger.f.gay@picslt.org



UPDATED Study January 2003


Study Question:
Will fair share adjustment for shared parenting and visitation lead to more intense argument over the amount of parenting time granted to the non-primary parent?


November 5, 1999 (Updated January 2003)

Abstract

Will reducing child support awards to credit visitation and shared parenting arrangements lead to greater conflict over custody and visitation? There is speculation that credits provide an incentive for parents (usually the mother) to fight for sole custody and against visitation. It has also been speculated that non-custodial parents (usually the father) might fight to increase visitation for the sake of reducing the child support award.

The analysis shows that visitation credits against actual child support do not produce a financial incentive for child support recipients to avoid visitation or for non-custodial parents to increase visitation. If such perverse incentives exist, they are not the fault of credit against actual child support for time children spend with the paying parent.

It is argued that elimination of the profit margin in "child support" awards that resulted from federal family law reform will remove a systemic barrier to greater acceptance of joint custody and greater equity in post divorce parenting.

Sections

1. Introduction
2. Limitations of the Study
3. Method
4. Results
5. Characteristics of the formulae
6. Answering the question
7. Conclusion
8. Citations


Click here for full text.


Return to Index Page