ORIGINS OF THE GREAT PYRAMID

It is currently regarded by Egyptologists, taught throughout our schools and printed in textbooks everywhere that the Egyptians (namely Khufu) were responsible for the construction of the Great Pyramid. However, when one looks at some of the damning evidence against such a theory it becomes apparent that the Egyptologists theories are based on an archaeological fraud.

The only evidence that links Khufu with the Great Pyramid is a single "Royal Inscription" on the ceiling of the Construction chamber. Colonel Howard-Vyse discovered this inscription between 1836-1837. At the time he made the discovery, his expedition was coming to an unsuccessful close and he had very little to show for the 10,000 pounds sterling he was granted. It is more than likely (as the evidence shows) that Vyse himself forged the inscription in order to make a monumental discovery.

The Egyptians recorded everything about their religion and farming etc but there isn't a single record stating that they were responsible for building one of the Seven Wonders of the World.  There is also an extreme lack of information about Khufu's past in the archeological records.  There hasn't even been a single statue identified as portraying Khufu. If Khufu built the Great Pyramid, shouldn't he be famous and worshiped for such a feat.

After an examination of the inscription, it should have been noted that the writing wasn't in the correct style used at the supposed time of its construction. In fact the style used wasn't adopted until centuries after it was supposedly written. The inscription also contains inconceivable grammatical errors. A symbol used as an adjective is actually a numerical symbol. If Vyse did fake the inscription, you can assume he copied it from one of the few books available at the time. A book frequently referenced throughout Vyse's diaries is called "Materia Hieroglyphica" by Sir John Gardner Wilkinson. This book is now known to contain many errors due to the lack of understanding about Egyptian writing at the time. An important error is that it confused  the sign for "Kh" with the sign for the solar disk representing "Ra". The inscription in the Great Pyramid also contains this exact same mistake! It actually reads "Ra-ufu" not "Kh-ufu". Surely this would have been an inconceivable error for an Egyptian scribe. It would also have been blasphemy since Ra was one of the foremost gods of the Egyptians.

The evidence outlined above shows beyond reasonable doubt that Vyse faked the inscription and that Khufu did not build the Great Pyramid. Yet Egyptologists still cling to the reasoning that the Pyramid must be Khufu's because it dates to 2550 BC. However the only evidence that it was built in 2550 BC is the claim by Vyse that Khufu built it. This demonstrates the kind of circular reasoning employed by many Egyptologists.

It can be proven with only basic mathematics that the Egyptions didn't build the pyramids.  The Egyptologists insist that all three Great Pyramids were constructed within a century.  Assuming very low numbers, the pyramids consist of 2.5 million stone blocks for each of the large 2 pyramids, and 1.0 million stone blocks for the small one giving 6.0 million stones to be cut, hauled, shaped, lifted and postioned in 100 years.

6,000,000 blocks / 1200 months = 5000 blocks laid per month

5000 blocks / 30 days per month = 166.6 blocks laid per day

166.6 blocks / 24 hour working day = 6.9 blocks laid per hour

So given very generous figures, the Egyptologists want you to believe that the Egyptions were able to complete (at a bare minimum) 7 stone blocks weighing 2.0-2.5 Tons every hour of every day for 100 years without days off for accidents or bad weather etc, using only primitive stone and copper tools, plant-fiber ropes and wooden sledges.

I don't think so!

For further information I highly recommend the following information sources:

Gods Of The New Millennium	The Giza Power Plant
Alan F Alford	Christopher Dunn