Date:
Wed, 14 Oct 1998 07:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
From:
heavenly-c-errors@lists.best.comAdd to Address Book
Subject:
Digest heavenly-c.v001.n955
Reply-To:
heavenly-c@lists.best.com
To:
heavenly-c@lists.best.com
-------------- BEGIN heavenly-c.v001.n955 --------------
001 - dream lover <yourdreamluv - Re: Digest heavenly-c.v001.n953
002 - Mad4Claire@aol.com - Re: Kate Winslet Rose doll
003 - recurring <recurring@yaho - Re: A list archive?
004 - nbk94@xs4all.nl (jeroen) - Re: Obsession
005 - nbk94@xs4all.nl (jeroen) - Re: i want to know
006 - Phil West <pgw16@hermes.c - Re: Obsession
007 - hanna bervoets <hanna-b@d - Re: HC poster
008 - Tine Nielsen <tinen@dorit - Jules et Jim - Jude related.
009 - ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature - Re: i want to know
010 - "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@v - Re: Digest heavenly-c.v001.n953
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n955.1 ---------------
From: dream lover <yourdreamluver@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Digest heavenly-c.v001.n953
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 20:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> I was not aware this was a Kate Winslet mailing list...but maybe I
am wrong,
>
> -J
ohhhh..lets not get nasty here..sorry if the topic of converstaion is
not up to par..I always felt that Kate gave a great deal to this
film..and talking about her was keeping the movie alive.
A
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n955.2 ---------------
From: Mad4Claire@aol.com
Subject: Re: Kate Winslet Rose doll
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 02:42:42 EDT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 98-10-13 12:18:18 EDT, you write:
<< http://www.primenet.com/~btn/aft.html >>
i looKed here....and i can't find the blasted doll!!!!!!
~~^^SARAH^^~~
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n955.3 ---------------
From: recurring <recurring@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: A list archive?
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 23:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi,
I have all the digests from about 730 and we are up to 950 right now.
Some are up on the net at:
http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc1.html
http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc2.html
http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc3.html
http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc4.html
http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc5.html
http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc6.html
http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc7.html
http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc8.html
http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc9.html
http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc9a.html
http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc9b.html
http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc9c.html
http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc9d.html
http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc9e.html
http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc9f.html
http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc9g.html
They take a little while to load up I've been told.
I think I've only uploaded up to about Digest 855. Not sure how far
back it was, if you can give me a date or whatever if it was recent
I'll be happy to find it and repost.. :o)
Jane
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n950.10 ---------------
From: ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature@innocent.com>
Subject: Re: A list archive?
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 15:49:14 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <199810131330.GAA03088@lists1.best.com>
Christy Price wrote:
>
> Does anyone know if there is an archive (or some such thing) for this
list? > Someone was wanting to re-read my story but I had already
deleted it :-(
I remember someone talking about saving all the digests...but I don't
remeber exactly who? Wait a sec...was it Jane? I think it was...
Marloes (-:
--------------- END heavenly-c.v001.n950 ---------------
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n955.4 ---------------
From: nbk94@xs4all.nl (jeroen)
Subject: Re: Obsession
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 07:49:19 GMT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <199810131806.LAA25048@lists1.best.com>
In-Reply-To: <199810131806.LAA25048@lists1.best.com>
On Tue, 13 Oct 1998 19:01:51 +0100, "Alisha" <kleinjan@btinternet.com>
wrote:
>I'd like to know how the moider scene affected you all
To be honest it doesn't bother me that much. It's a nasty scene, but
compared to the real-life event where they hit her like what 60 times
it's pretty tame.
Which brings up a question: did peter and fran have any particular
reason for reducing this violence?
Also after watching honora ruining her daughter's life for the biggest
part of the film i'm just not that fond of her, and i tend to
sympathize with p&j.
The thing about HC that affected me the most when i saw it for the
first time was the 'it was a condition of their release that they
never meet again' at the end of the film. Oh yeah and the scene in
the tearoom of course.
--
Jeroen - The Netherlands - www.xs4all.nl/~nbk94
All the best people have bad chests and bone diseases.
It's all frightfully romantic! - Heavenly Creatures
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n955.5 ---------------
From: nbk94@xs4all.nl (jeroen)
Subject: Re: i want to know
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 07:49:20 GMT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <199810131834.LAA14858@lists1.best.com>
<199810132018.NAA04993@lists1.best.com>
In-Reply-To: <199810132018.NAA04993@lists1.best.com>
On Tue, 13 Oct 1998 15:14:18 -0700, Queen Jenny
<platinum_whore@geocities.com> wrote:
>miniature kate speech version: she annoys the living hell out of me.
her acting (even
>some parts of HC) seems so unnatural and melodramatic like she was
nervous or something.
I'm wondering, which parts?
I have a problem with a few kate scenes in HC, like the scene on the
phone where she goes 'they can't, they can't', it sounds like an
american faking a british accent. Bloody awful. And the scene in the
NZ and UK cut, where p&j are hiding in the bushes at the ilam garden
party... it's a very clumsy scene, the acting of kate and even melanie
is way below par there.
That said, i think her acting in JUDE is sheer brilliance.
And i'll check out EXOTICA, thanks.
--
Jeroen - The Netherlands - www.xs4all.nl/~nbk94
All the best people have bad chests and bone diseases.
It's all frightfully romantic! - Heavenly Creatures
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n955.6 ---------------
From: Phil West <pgw16@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Obsession
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 09:41:29 +0100 (BST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <199810140752.AAA21428@lists1.best.com>
> Which brings up a question: did peter and fran have any particular
> reason for reducing this violence?
Taste and tact might come in to it at some level, I suppose; but isn't
it
mostly because in a film that works by surprise, shock and unexpected
delight, a five-minute scene of naturalistic brain-bashing, complete
with
Nora's false teeth coming out and all the other details, would be
numbing,
not shocking, and numbness is not the feeling HC wants to produce; the
screenplay invents too much time in evoking teenage wild swings of
emotion, lows and highs, terror and despair, to suddenly ditch it all
for
the kind of numb, brutalizing irony of, say, Euripides' Electra (a play
bearing great comparison with HC, not least because it's also
matricidal)
> Also after watching honora ruining her daughter's life for the biggest
> part of the film i'm just not that fond of her, and i tend to
> sympathize with p&j.
I find that at this point I can't sympathize with them, almost for the
first time in the film (which isn't to say that other characters aren't
portrayed sympathetically); that, for me, is the wrench that HC does
better than any other film
> The thing about HC that affected me the most when i saw it for the
> first time was the 'it was a condition of their release that they
> never meet again' at the end of the film.
Me too; it's amazing what one line of text can do... what other single
line or epilogue has such effect?
Cheers,
Phil
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n955.7 ---------------
From: hanna bervoets <hanna-b@dds.nl>
Subject: Re: HC poster
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 10:57:04 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
At 16:09 13-10-98 -0400, you wrote:
THANKS!
www.pixposters.com has the German and US versions last time I checked
but
>their inventory changes. If I remember the US one was $20 plus
shipping,
>and I thik the German one was $15.
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>"We have decided how sad it is for other people that they cannot
>appreciate our genious."-Pauline Parker
>
>"Love is tender and knows no gender"-unknown
>
>"I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!"-unknown
>
> http://members.xoom.com/juliethulme/
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>On Tue, 13 Oct 1998, hanna bervoets wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know where I can order a HC poster on the internet?
>> I want one to hang above my bed ;)
>>
>> Hanna
>>
>> -hanna-b@dds.nl-
>>
>
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n955.8 ---------------
From: Tine Nielsen <tinen@dorit.ihi.ku.dk>
Subject: Jules et Jim - Jude related.
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 12:24:15 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi Creatures,
I'm just delurking here for a while. I went to see Truffaut's "Jules et
Jim" the other day. Before I went I remembered how Michael Winterbottom
had
made Kate and Christopher Eccleston watch this particular film to give
them
inspiration.
First of all, I really enjoyed the movie and could really see how
Winterbottom and the two actors had drawn inspiration from this film.
The
first scenes that sprang to mind was the "steam engine" girl, that of
course reminds one of Sue showing off in the bar right after she's
befriended her cousin.
Second of all the bike riding scenes.
Third of all, running and playing at the beach.
I'm sure you guys can think of many more similarities.
Cheers,
*Passer borovnia*
Who's looking forward to 14 days of French film.....
=====================================================
"No voice divine the storm allayed
no light propicious shone
when snatched from all affectual aid
we perished each alone
but I beneath a rougher sea
and whelmed in deeper gulfs than he"
- William Cowper
tinen@dorit.ihi.ku.dk/bridehead@hotmail.com
=====================================================
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n955.9 ---------------
From: ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature@innocent.com>
Subject: Re: i want to know
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 13:39:31 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <199810131834.LAA14858@lists1.best.com>
<199810132018.NAA04993@lists1.best.com>
<199810140752.AAA21511@lists1.best.com>
jeroen wrote:
> I have a problem with a few kate scenes in HC, like the scene on the
> phone where she goes 'they can't, they can't', it sounds like an
> american faking a british accent.
I think that part is so good...I don't hear an accent, just pain, and
hurt...
Marloes
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n955.10 ---------------
From: "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@videotron.ca>
Subject: Re: Digest heavenly-c.v001.n953
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 10:42:00 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
dream lover wrote:
>> I was not aware this was a Kate Winslet mailing list...but maybe I
>am wrong,
>>
>> -J
>
>ohhhh..lets not get nasty here..sorry if the topic of converstaion is
>not up to par..I always felt that Kate gave a great deal to this
>film..and talking about her was keeping the movie alive.
Yes, please. Let's not start this again!
Sometimes we go off on a Kate Tangent, sometimes on a Mel tangent, we
also go on Peter Jackson strings, other times we go on about Anne Perry
and so on and so forth.
This list is meant to keep abreast of what's happening in the careers
of
people involved with HC.
When I was a kid, Star Wars newsletters would mention "Pinball Summer"
(with Mark Hammill) and "Force 10 from Navarone" (with Harrison Ford).
"American Graffitti" had a very successful re-release in the late 70s
because of its cast (Ron Howard of "Happy Days", Cindy Williams of
"Laverne and Shirley", Suzanne Summers of "Three's Company", Richard
Dreyfuss of "Close Encounters of the Third Kind" and Harisson Ford).
These "unknowns" at the time of the original release were now "names",
including the director, George Lucas.
The future successes of Kate, Mel and "The Lord of the Rings" ensure
that
HC will not fade away. In fact, it should make HC into a bona-fide
"Cult
movie", one that gets more popular as time goes by.
The majority of listers now have come across HC on Video or TV. A lot
of
them discovered HC because of Kate.
So, please, let's not start these darn "flame wars" over exclusivity
again.
(:^)]
--------------- END heavenly-c.v001.n955 ---------------Date:
Wed, 14 Oct 1998 11:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
From:
heavenly-c-errors@lists.best.comAdd to Address Book
Subject:
Digest heavenly-c.v001.n956
Reply-To:
heavenly-c@lists.best.com
To:
heavenly-c@lists.best.com
-------------- BEGIN heavenly-c.v001.n956 --------------
001 - "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@v - Re: Obsession
002 - "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@v - Violence
003 - "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@v - Accents
004 - RUbabes@aol.com - Some $.02 on the Moider Scene
005 - Jason Schnebly <schnebly@ - Re: Digest heavenly-c.v001.n955
006 - "Alisha" <kleinjan@btinte - Re: Obsession
007 - Queen Jenny <platinum_who - Re: what was that?!
008 - Queen Jenny <platinum_who - a bunch of stuff...
009 - "Alisha" <kleinjan@btinte - something
010 - "M. Charles Frappier" <mc - Re: something
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n956.1 ---------------
From: "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@videotron.ca>
Subject: Re: Obsession
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 10:49:15 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
jeroen wrote:
>Which brings up a question: did peter and fran have any particular
>reason for reducing this violence?
Peter was going for the emotional and psychological sides of it. He had
just completed "The Goriest Film in History" which was a comedy
(BRAINDEAD, known in the US as DEAD/ALIVE). In his own words, he wanted
to do something "Relatively bloodless but genuinely creepy".
(:^)]
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n956.2 ---------------
From: "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@videotron.ca>
Subject: Violence
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 10:58:09 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Phil West wrote:
>I suppose; but isn't it
>mostly because in a film that works by surprise, shock and unexpected
>delight, a five-minute scene of naturalistic brain-bashing, complete
with
>Nora's false teeth coming out and all the other details, would be
numbing,
>not shocking, and numbness is not the feeling HC wants to produce;
It's like Alfred Hitchcock who directed the murder scene in "Psycho" so
that the blade never graphically pierces the skin.
Peter found that being too graphic somehow produces humour rather than
fright.
The scene does an amazing job of communicating the frenzied confusion
in
the girls minds. They themselves were not aware that they hit her so
many
times.
It certainly is more effective then a "blow by blow" acoount would have
been.
BTW, the "moider" is a tad longer in the NZ cut. Most of the blows cut
out are delivered by Kate. One wonders if Miramax wanted to reduce Anne
Perry's role to avoid a lawsuit.
(:^)]
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n956.3 ---------------
From: "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@videotron.ca>
Subject: Accents
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 11:07:50 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Jeroen wrote:
>'they can't, they can't', it sounds like an
>> american faking a british accent.
Accents are relative.
The odd thing about accents is that they often feel "put on" to people
who are unfamiliar with them. But Kate really talks with that accent.
Mel's accent seemed like she was putting that on as well at first but I
eventually have to face the fact that I was the one with the weird
"American accent". In Montreal, however, I am known as someone without
a
trace of any accent, French Canadian, American or British. This is
helping me get TV gigs.
(:^)]
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n956.4 ---------------
From: RUbabes@aol.com
Subject: Some $.02 on the Moider Scene
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 11:59:26 EDT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 98-10-14 11:11:29 EDT, Jeroen and Phil write:
<<
> Which brings up a question: did peter and fran have any particular
> reason for reducing this violence?
Taste and tact might come in to it at some level, I suppose; but isn't
it
mostly because in a film that works by surprise, shock and unexpected
delight, a five-minute scene of naturalistic brain-bashing, complete
with
Nora's false teeth coming out and all the other details, would be
numbing,
not shocking, and numbness is not the feeling HC wants to produce....
>>
I cannot agree more. We are witness to quite enough as the scene
stands....and
considering there are minor deviations from other actual events (or the
full
re-enactment of actual events) in the course of the film, I shouldn't
think
that PJ & FW would need to produce the murder scene the exact way it
happened.
They have placed their angle and mood and narrative on that element of
PP &
JH's story just like any other element in the film. I think the scene is
stunning and does just what it should.
<<
> Also after watching honora ruining her daughter's life for the
biggest
> part of the film i'm just not that fond of her, and i tend to
> sympathize with p&j.
I find that at this point I can't sympathize with them, almost for the
first time in the film (which isn't to say that other characters aren't
portrayed sympathetically); that, for me, is the wrench that HC does
better than any other film >>
I have to say that I tend to revert to an ultimate 'feeling sorry for
them'
kind of feeling. It's a slow build up...and when the brick hits my
absolute
saddness for the state these two people have brought themselves to
reaches a
high point. I feel sympathetic for them...but, not b/c the 'finally got
rid of
her'. I like Honora and have spent many a viewing of the film really
trying to
pick apart her role. She is a mother who obviously wants the best for
her
daughter and genuinely cares about her-unlike Hilda Hulme, IMHO. Where
my
sympathy comes in is in the areas that Juliet and Paul felt that had no
options left and reverted to thinking that killing Honora would solve
their
problems...I feel bad that they didn't think about consequence and
everything
about the murder that would ultimately tear them apart, instead of
bring them
together. That they had lost the perspective of the situation is
horrible...they were so driven, madly, for their cause that logical
thinking
about post-crime situations flew out the window.
Those are the elements that stay with me greatly regarding the whole
murder
scene and the surrounding climax pieces of the film.
Just my two cents....
What is a little interesting irony thing thrown in there, though....is
that
although they were ordered to 'never meet again', and were jailed
seperately,
etc etc...they will forever be together in the memory of that crime,
this
film, etc. They will always be a duo, forever a pair in everyone's
mind. They
got what they wished for....just in a totally different
method...hmmmmm...:)
-Jesse :)
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n956.5 ---------------
From: Jason Schnebly <schnebly@brookings.net>
Subject: Re: Digest heavenly-c.v001.n955
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 11:35:59 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <199810141438.HAA24052@lists1.best.com>
does anyone know how I can drop this mailing list? (no offense)
schnebly@brookings.net
heavenly-c-errors@lists.best.com wrote:
> -------------- BEGIN heavenly-c.v001.n955 --------------
>
> 001 - dream lover <yourdreamluv - Re: Digest heavenly-c.v001.n953
> 002 - Mad4Claire@aol.com - Re: Kate Winslet Rose doll
> 003 - recurring <recurring@yaho - Re: A list archive?
> 004 - nbk94@xs4all.nl (jeroen) - Re: Obsession
> 005 - nbk94@xs4all.nl (jeroen) - Re: i want to know
> 006 - Phil West <pgw16@hermes.c - Re: Obsession
> 007 - hanna bervoets <hanna-b@d - Re: HC poster
> 008 - Tine Nielsen <tinen@dorit - Jules et Jim - Jude related.
> 009 - ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature - Re: i want to know
> 010 - "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@v - Re: Digest heavenly-c.v001.n953
>
> --------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n955.1 ---------------
>
> From: dream lover <yourdreamluver@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: Digest heavenly-c.v001.n953
> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 20:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> >
> > I was not aware this was a Kate Winslet mailing list...but maybe I
> am wrong,
> >
> > -J
>
> ohhhh..lets not get nasty here..sorry if the topic of converstaion is
> not up to par..I always felt that Kate gave a great deal to this
> film..and talking about her was keeping the movie alive.
>
> A
> _________________________________________________________
> DO YOU YAHOO!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> --------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n955.2 ---------------
>
> From: Mad4Claire@aol.com
> Subject: Re: Kate Winslet Rose doll
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 02:42:42 EDT
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> In a message dated 98-10-13 12:18:18 EDT, you write:
>
> << http://www.primenet.com/~btn/aft.html >>
> i looKed here....and i can't find the blasted doll!!!!!!
>
> ~~^^SARAH^^~~
>
> --------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n955.3 ---------------
>
> From: recurring <recurring@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: A list archive?
> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 23:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Hi,
>
> I have all the digests from about 730 and we are up to 950 right now.
> Some are up on the net at:
> http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc1.html
> http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc2.html
> http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc3.html
> http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc4.html
> http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc5.html
> http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc6.html
> http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc7.html
> http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc8.html
> http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc9.html
> http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc9a.html
> http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc9b.html
> http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc9c.html
> http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc9d.html
> http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc9e.html
> http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc9f.html
> http://www.geocities.com/Eureka/Promenade/8655/hc9g.html
>
> They take a little while to load up I've been told.
>
> I think I've only uploaded up to about Digest 855. Not sure how far
> back it was, if you can give me a date or whatever if it was recent
> I'll be happy to find it and repost.. :o)
>
> Jane
>
> --------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n950.10 ---------------
>
> From: ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature@innocent.com>
> Subject: Re: A list archive?
> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 15:49:14 +0100
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> References: <199810131330.GAA03088@lists1.best.com>
>
> Christy Price wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know if there is an archive (or some such thing) for
this
> list? > Someone was wanting to re-read my story but I had already
> deleted it :-(
>
> I remember someone talking about saving all the digests...but I don't
> remeber exactly who? Wait a sec...was it Jane? I think it was...
>
> Marloes (-:
>
> --------------- END heavenly-c.v001.n950 ---------------
> _________________________________________________________
> DO YOU YAHOO!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> --------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n955.4 ---------------
>
> From: nbk94@xs4all.nl (jeroen)
> Subject: Re: Obsession
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 07:49:19 GMT
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> References: <199810131806.LAA25048@lists1.best.com>
> In-Reply-To: <199810131806.LAA25048@lists1.best.com>
>
> On Tue, 13 Oct 1998 19:01:51 +0100, "Alisha" <kleinjan@btinternet.com>
> wrote:
>
> >I'd like to know how the moider scene affected you all
>
> To be honest it doesn't bother me that much. It's a nasty scene, but
> compared to the real-life event where they hit her like what 60 times
> it's pretty tame.
>
> Which brings up a question: did peter and fran have any particular
> reason for reducing this violence?
>
> Also after watching honora ruining her daughter's life for the biggest
> part of the film i'm just not that fond of her, and i tend to
> sympathize with p&j.
>
> The thing about HC that affected me the most when i saw it for the
> first time was the 'it was a condition of their release that they
> never meet again' at the end of the film. Oh yeah and the scene in
> the tearoom of course.
>
> --
> Jeroen - The Netherlands - www.xs4all.nl/~nbk94
> All the best people have bad chests and bone diseases.
> It's all frightfully romantic! - Heavenly Creatures
>
> --------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n955.5 ---------------
>
> From: nbk94@xs4all.nl (jeroen)
> Subject: Re: i want to know
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 07:49:20 GMT
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> References: <199810131834.LAA14858@lists1.best.com>
<199810132018.NAA04993@lists1.best.com>
> In-Reply-To: <199810132018.NAA04993@lists1.best.com>
>
> On Tue, 13 Oct 1998 15:14:18 -0700, Queen Jenny
> <platinum_whore@geocities.com> wrote:
>
> >miniature kate speech version: she annoys the living hell out of me.
her acting (even
> >some parts of HC) seems so unnatural and melodramatic like she was
nervous or something.
>
> I'm wondering, which parts?
>
> I have a problem with a few kate scenes in HC, like the scene on the
> phone where she goes 'they can't, they can't', it sounds like an
> american faking a british accent. Bloody awful. And the scene in the
> NZ and UK cut, where p&j are hiding in the bushes at the ilam garden
> party... it's a very clumsy scene, the acting of kate and even melanie
> is way below par there.
>
> That said, i think her acting in JUDE is sheer brilliance.
>
> And i'll check out EXOTICA, thanks.
>
> --
> Jeroen - The Netherlands - www.xs4all.nl/~nbk94
> All the best people have bad chests and bone diseases.
> It's all frightfully romantic! - Heavenly Creatures
>
> --------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n955.6 ---------------
>
> From: Phil West <pgw16@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
> Subject: Re: Obsession
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 09:41:29 +0100 (BST)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> In-Reply-To: <199810140752.AAA21428@lists1.best.com>
>
> > Which brings up a question: did peter and fran have any particular
> > reason for reducing this violence?
>
> Taste and tact might come in to it at some level, I suppose; but
isn't it
> mostly because in a film that works by surprise, shock and unexpected
> delight, a five-minute scene of naturalistic brain-bashing, complete
with
> Nora's false teeth coming out and all the other details, would be
numbing,
> not shocking, and numbness is not the feeling HC wants to produce; the
> screenplay invents too much time in evoking teenage wild swings of
> emotion, lows and highs, terror and despair, to suddenly ditch it all
for
> the kind of numb, brutalizing irony of, say, Euripides' Electra (a
play
> bearing great comparison with HC, not least because it's also
matricidal)
>
> > Also after watching honora ruining her daughter's life for the
biggest
> > part of the film i'm just not that fond of her, and i tend to
> > sympathize with p&j.
>
> I find that at this point I can't sympathize with them, almost for the
> first time in the film (which isn't to say that other characters
aren't
> portrayed sympathetically); that, for me, is the wrench that HC does
> better than any other film
>
> > The thing about HC that affected me the most when i saw it for the
> > first time was the 'it was a condition of their release that they
> > never meet again' at the end of the film.
>
> Me too; it's amazing what one line of text can do... what other single
> line or epilogue has such effect?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Phil
>
> --------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n955.7 ---------------
>
> From: hanna bervoets <hanna-b@dds.nl>
> Subject: Re: HC poster
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 10:57:04 +0200
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> At 16:09 13-10-98 -0400, you wrote:
>
> THANKS!
>
> www.pixposters.com has the German and US versions last time I checked
but
> >their inventory changes. If I remember the US one was $20 plus
shipping,
> >and I thik the German one was $15.
> >
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >"We have decided how sad it is for other people that they cannot
> >appreciate our genious."-Pauline Parker
> >
> >"Love is tender and knows no gender"-unknown
> >
> >"I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!"-unknown
> >
> > http://members.xoom.com/juliethulme/
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> >On Tue, 13 Oct 1998, hanna bervoets wrote:
> >
> >> Does anyone know where I can order a HC poster on the internet?
> >> I want one to hang above my bed ;)
> >>
> >> Hanna
> >>
> >> -hanna-b@dds.nl-
> >>
> >
>
> --------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n955.8 ---------------
>
> From: Tine Nielsen <tinen@dorit.ihi.ku.dk>
> Subject: Jules et Jim - Jude related.
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 12:24:15 +0200
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi Creatures,
>
> I'm just delurking here for a while. I went to see Truffaut's "Jules
et
> Jim" the other day. Before I went I remembered how Michael
Winterbottom had
> made Kate and Christopher Eccleston watch this particular film to
give them
> inspiration.
>
> First of all, I really enjoyed the movie and could really see how
> Winterbottom and the two actors had drawn inspiration from this film.
The
> first scenes that sprang to mind was the "steam engine" girl, that of
> course reminds one of Sue showing off in the bar right after she's
> befriended her cousin.
>
> Second of all the bike riding scenes.
>
> Third of all, running and playing at the beach.
>
> I'm sure you guys can think of many more similarities.
>
> Cheers,
>
> *Passer borovnia*
>
> Who's looking forward to 14 days of French film.....
>
> =====================================================
> "No voice divine the storm allayed
> no light propicious shone
> when snatched from all affectual aid
> we perished each alone
> but I beneath a rougher sea
> and whelmed in deeper gulfs than he"
> - William Cowper
> tinen@dorit.ihi.ku.dk/bridehead@hotmail.com
> =====================================================
>
> --------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n955.9 ---------------
>
> From: ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature@innocent.com>
> Subject: Re: i want to know
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 13:39:31 +0000
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> References: <199810131834.LAA14858@lists1.best.com>
> <199810132018.NAA04993@lists1.best.com>
<199810140752.AAA21511@lists1.best.com>
>
> jeroen wrote:
>
> > I have a problem with a few kate scenes in HC, like the scene on the
> > phone where she goes 'they can't, they can't', it sounds like an
> > american faking a british accent.
>
> I think that part is so good...I don't hear an accent, just pain, and
> hurt...
>
> Marloes
>
> --------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n955.10 ---------------
>
> From: "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@videotron.ca>
> Subject: Re: Digest heavenly-c.v001.n953
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 10:42:00 -0400
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> dream lover wrote:
>
> >> I was not aware this was a Kate Winslet mailing list...but maybe I
> >am wrong,
> >>
> >> -J
> >
> >ohhhh..lets not get nasty here..sorry if the topic of converstaion is
> >not up to par..I always felt that Kate gave a great deal to this
> >film..and talking about her was keeping the movie alive.
>
> Yes, please. Let's not start this again!
>
> Sometimes we go off on a Kate Tangent, sometimes on a Mel tangent, we
> also go on Peter Jackson strings, other times we go on about Anne
Perry
> and so on and so forth.
>
> This list is meant to keep abreast of what's happening in the careers
of
> people involved with HC.
>
> When I was a kid, Star Wars newsletters would mention "Pinball Summer"
> (with Mark Hammill) and "Force 10 from Navarone" (with Harrison Ford).
> "American Graffitti" had a very successful re-release in the late 70s
> because of its cast (Ron Howard of "Happy Days", Cindy Williams of
> "Laverne and Shirley", Suzanne Summers of "Three's Company", Richard
> Dreyfuss of "Close Encounters of the Third Kind" and Harisson Ford).
> These "unknowns" at the time of the original release were now "names",
> including the director, George Lucas.
>
> The future successes of Kate, Mel and "The Lord of the Rings" ensure
that
> HC will not fade away. In fact, it should make HC into a bona-fide
"Cult
> movie", one that gets more popular as time goes by.
>
> The majority of listers now have come across HC on Video or TV. A lot
of
> them discovered HC because of Kate.
>
> So, please, let's not start these darn "flame wars" over exclusivity
> again.
>
> (:^)]
>
> --------------- END heavenly-c.v001.n955 ---------------
does anyone know how I can get off this mailing list????
schnebly@brookings.net
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n956.6 ---------------
From: "Alisha" <kleinjan@btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Obsession
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 23:01:16 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> Anyway, what I'm trying to get to, is, I'd like to know how the
moider
scene
>> affected you all - I don't know if this has been discussed before,
but
I'm
>> interested.
I'm bored, I'm answering my own question. I'm answering it at some
length.
I think what struck me the most was that wonderful piece of music, I
think
it's The Humming Chorus or something like that. The first time I saw the
movie, I was, for some reason, expecting Honora to be killed in a
house. I
have no idea why I thought that, I had no background information except
that
she would be killed. So ever since that second where she's leaning over
to
check the food in her oven, I was tense. It seemed as though they had
been
walking down that path forever... The second time I saw it, the instant
the
music started up again, I felt the same anxiety - I think it was a very
well-made sequence, and KW's Lady Macbethesque performance was
fantastic.
I've never been really squeamish and the actual moider didn't bother me
much. I watch a lot of films and I try to watch them objectively, and I
think what bothered me more was when I got really interested in the
real-life events and a sense of reality started to set in.
Seeing Pauline's mugshot was what scared me the most, because it
detached
the real events from the film, but I still felt a certain sense of
*knowing*
her. [I think I'm rambling] Also, discovering that Henry Hulme lectured
at
Liverpool University was kinda weird, b/c my dad worked there for some
time
a couple of years ago.
I'm definitely rambling now.
Also, while I have your attention [or not, as the case may be], does
anyone
have a problem with me and my long sig? B/C I've been on mailing lists
before and I've found it's bothered people having the same sig posted
several times a day and wasting valuable downloading time.
Right. Now I've talked myself into a stupor, I'm going to bed.
'Night,
Alisha
xoxox
ps- this is typical. rnaui.dll has crashed so y'all will be getting
this in
the morning. Oh well. Time differences etc. ::yawn::
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n956.7 ---------------
From: Queen Jenny <platinum_whore@geocities.com>
Subject: Re: what was that?!
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 11:50:42 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <199810140306.UAA25396@lists1.best.com>
> >>>worshipful 15 year olds maybe..but I suppose she's a better
role-model than
> Drew Barrymore. oh well, 15 year olds in general bother me.>>>
>
> (sorry thi is to the list buti lost the senders e-mail addy!)
>
> alright... first of all, i do love kate.. but i totally respect your
opinions
> of her acting and all.. and thats cool that you just see her as a
cool person
> and stuff... but um ok.. until last week I WAS 15!!!!! (it was just
my
> birthday) um.. excuse me?!?!?! i see absolutely nothing wrong with
being 15
> years old... bothering factors should be judged by a persons maturity
and not
> by a general age group.... noone that mets me believes im actually
15...I was
> invited(and went) to the Tony awards last year by a guy who thought
my friend
> and I were 22...hell, even Kate didnt think I was 15 last february!..
yet some
> 15 year olds give the impression that they are 12 by swooning over
leeeoooo..
> and all that crap... so listen, Id really like to know now what makes
me such
> a bother to you considering what age I am...
Okay, here's why I put in that one...until about 3 months ago, I used
to visit personal home pages, not the "hi, i'm katie, here are some
links and a picture of my cat" type, but the poetry writing journal
my-page-is-more-depressed-than yours sect. Everyone was about 15 and
would give long talks about how they wished they were more like Kate
and plaster her picture everywhere. It made me want to beat them with a
stick.
Don't get me wrogn..I was 15 but 2 years ago...and I was the same was
with Fairuza Balk...but now i've turned into a bit of a cynic about the
whole bit..
sorry. nothing personal.
-J
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n956.8 ---------------
From: Queen Jenny <platinum_whore@geocities.com>
Subject: a bunch of stuff...
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 12:03:28 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <199810141438.HAA24052@lists1.best.com>
no flame war. don't worry..i take it all fine, but when someone asks me
why i'm on the list if
i don't like Kate, i sort of get the message i shouldn't be there at
all. i don't mind talking
about her. I'd really like it if she took a more natural, less severely
emotive role. I think
she could fit that nicely. I like talking about what's up with ol' kate
and maybe i'll take in
the next flick and see what it's all about.
no grudges.
second...
the part in HC that really turned me around the other way was when Paul
fakes her death on the
bicycle...when kate said "DON'T!" like she was attending some sort of
tea party. and the crying
that followed...maybe that was inteded to be humorous...well, i know it
was, but if you really
thought that your best friend had been send careening over a hill to
her death, the crying
would be a bit more realistic. A lot of Kate's crying seems forced.
how did the moider effect me?
well..maybe you'd find me disturbed..the first time i was
having..um..difficulties with mother,
and i still am..so it all had an eerily pleasing quality to it..but it
all jumped back to the
ship and Paul so fast that i couldn't even think about it before I was
thrown into another
emotion.
things are odd that way.
-J
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n956.9 ---------------
From: "Alisha" <kleinjan@btinternet.com>
Subject: something
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 18:32:12 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Okay, you guys are the experts...
http://www.btinternet.com/~f.bean/proof.gif
any similarity here?
Alisha
xoxox
alisha1121@hotmail.com
kleinjan@btinternet.com
http://www.btinternet.com/~f.bean/frontx.htm
"Don't you blame the movies. Movies don't create psychos;
movies make psychos more creative."
- Billy Loomis, 'Scream'
"I really like gratuitous nudity. I hate when people go
'I'll only do it if it makes sense for the movie.' It
never makes sense. So I like it - the more gratuitous
the better."
- David Duchovny. Amen.
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n956.10 ---------------
From: "M. Charles Frappier" <mc@oil.ca>
Subject: Re: something
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 14:02:30 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Ha ah!
You tried to mix us up by mixing up the captions, didn't you? You sly
fox
you.... :)
I always thought they looked quite similar. This only serves to further
reinfoce my position.
Cheers,
Charles
-----Original Message-----
From: Alisha <kleinjan@btinternet.com>
To: heavenly-c@lists.best.com <heavenly-c@lists.best.com>
Date: Wednesday, October 14, 1998 1:09 PM
Subject: something
>Okay, you guys are the experts...
>
>http://www.btinternet.com/~f.bean/proof.gif
>
>any similarity here?
>
>
>Alisha
>xoxox
>
>
>alisha1121@hotmail.com
>kleinjan@btinternet.com
>http://www.btinternet.com/~f.bean/frontx.htm
>
>
>"Don't you blame the movies. Movies don't create psychos;
>movies make psychos more creative."
>
> - Billy Loomis, 'Scream'
>
>
>"I really like gratuitous nudity. I hate when people go
>'I'll only do it if it makes sense for the movie.' It
>never makes sense. So I like it - the more gratuitous
>the better."
>
> - David Duchovny. Amen.
--------------- END heavenly-c.v001.n956 ---------------
Date:
Wed, 14 Oct 1998 12:32:26 -0700 (PDT)
From:
heavenly-c-errors@lists.best.comAdd to Address Book
Subject:
Digest heavenly-c.v001.n957
Reply-To:
heavenly-c@lists.best.com
To:
heavenly-c@lists.best.com
-------------- BEGIN heavenly-c.v001.n957 --------------
001 - "Jose Antonio Abad Trillo - Re: i want to know
002 - nbk94@xs4all.nl (jeroen) - Re: i want to know
003 - "Jose Antonio Abad Trillo - Re: Digest heavenly-c.v001.n953
004 - "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@v - Re: Obsession
005 - "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@v - Re: a bunch of stuff...
006 - "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@v - Re: what was that?!
007 - Adit <adit@main.aquanet.c - obsessed teenagers?
008 - "Alisha" <kleinjan@btinte - Re: something
009 - Rosedwson4@aol.com - Kates acting-- was Re:i want to
know...
010 - Rosedwson4@aol.com - Kate and the spiceys?!?!?! LOL!!!
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n957.1 ---------------
From: "Jose Antonio Abad Trillo" <jabad@softtek.com>
Subject: Re: i want to know
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 13:11:36 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <199810131834.LAA14858@lists1.best.com>
<199810132018.NAA04993@lists1.best.com>
<199810140752.AAA21511@lists1.best.com>
<199810141140.EAA18091@lists1.best.com>
~lyric~ wrote:
> jeroen wrote:
>
> > I have a problem with a few kate scenes in HC, like the scene on the
> > phone where she goes 'they can't, they can't', it sounds like an
> > american faking a british accent.
>
> I think that part is so good...I don't hear an accent, just pain, and
> hurt...
>
> Marloes
I agree with Marloes in this one. For me, it was one of the most
powerfull pain scenes. I break into tears everytime I see it.
Jose Antonio
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n957.2 ---------------
From: nbk94@xs4all.nl (jeroen)
Subject: Re: i want to know
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 18:07:48 GMT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <199810131834.LAA14858@lists1.best.com>
<199810132018.NAA04993@lists1.best.com>
<199810140752.AAA21511@lists1.best.com>
<199810141140.EAA18091@lists1.best.com>
In-Reply-To: <199810141140.EAA18091@lists1.best.com>
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998 13:39:31 +0000, ~lyric~
<heavenlycreature@innocent.com> wrote:
>jeroen wrote:
>
>> I have a problem with a few kate scenes in HC, like the scene on the
>> phone where she goes 'they can't, they can't', it sounds like an
>> american faking a british accent.
>
>I think that part is so good...I don't hear an accent, just pain, and
>hurt...
I hear that too, but mostly on mel's end of the phone line.
Like with any film, after a certain number of viewings the emotional
impact wears off, and you will start noticing little things like this.
It sucks, but that's life.
--
Jeroen - The Netherlands - www.xs4all.nl/~nbk94
All the best people have bad chests and bone diseases.
It's all frightfully romantic! - Heavenly Creatures
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n957.3 ---------------
From: "Jose Antonio Abad Trillo" <jabad@softtek.com>
Subject: Re: Digest heavenly-c.v001.n953
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 13:24:17 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <199810140006.RAA03189@lists1.best.com>
<199810140306.UAA25382@lists1.best.com>
Oh no! This is not a KW mailing list, this is a HC mailing list!
Besides, you must understand that many of the loyal HC fans discovered
HC because of Kate (me included) and, talking for my self I can say
that I am a
HC fan and a KW & ML fan, so I like everything to do with them.
I asked because you said some things that I found contradictory to a HC
fan, but you have your point, so, lets live with the queen stocked to
us :)
Jose Antonio
Queen Jenny wrote:
> > Valid and respectful opinion in deed. Freedom in mind!
> > My question is: ¿Why are you subscribed to this list?
>
> I was not aware this was a Kate Winslet mailing list...but maybe I am
wrong, i've been away so damned long I wouldn't know. I love HC. I
adore Melanie Lynskey. I've always had a weak spot for a fine film and
HC is
> that and more, even though it's been forever and a day since I've
broken out that video tape.
> and besides..i've been on this thing for almost 3 years, can't bring
myself to leave. You're all stuck with me.
>
> -J
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n957.4 ---------------
From: "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@videotron.ca>
Subject: Re: Obsession
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 14:39:47 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Alisha wrote:
>I think what struck me the most was that wonderful piece of music, I
think
>it's The Humming Chorus or something like that.
One of the most memorable moments in my life, for some reason, is
getting
a lift back from the set to the hotel in Christchurch. I was riding in
the back seat of Peter's car. Peter was driving.Fran was riding in the
front passenger seat. I was tired after a long wonderful day
culminating
with screening the rushes of the "moider scene". Fran put "The Humming
Chorus" (from Madama Butterfly" on the car stereo. She then turned to
me
and said "We were thinking of using this music for the walk in the
woods
before the murder".
Having just seen the footage, I smiled. I really felt like I was
getting
a priviledged look at the making of a masterpiece that night.
A year and a bit later, when I saw the film and heard the chorus, tears
welled up in my eyes. It was just as beautiful as I imagined.
(:^)]
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n957.5 ---------------
From: "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@videotron.ca>
Subject: Re: a bunch of stuff...
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 15:10:45 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Queen Jenny wrote:
>.maybe that was inteded to be humorous...well, i know it was, but if
you
>really
>thought that your best friend had been send careening over a hill to
her
>death, the crying
>would be a bit more realistic. A lot of Kate's crying seems forced.
The two girls were playacting in a melodramatic way inspired by the
films
they saw and the litterature they read. It is deliberately forced.
Why do you think Juliet cries in the tub when Pauline reveals her
plans?
She is horrified to find out that Pauline didn't get that they were
playing.
The game had gone too far.
(:^)]
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n957.6 ---------------
From: "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@videotron.ca>
Subject: Re: what was that?!
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 15:06:43 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Queen Jenny wrote:
>I was the same was with Fairuza Balk...but now i've turned into a bit
of a
>cynic about the whole bit
By your own admission, this is just a phase in developpment. So don't
deny that phase to others.
This is another phase of being a teen: spitting on behavior that's
younger than ours. I know this because I spent my teen years rejecting
a
lot of things from my childhood. The surprising thing is that later in
life you begin embracing those things again and all you can think of is
how immature and naive you were to think that rejecting your childhood
would make you mature faster. Doing that just makes you into a jaded
teen
with no sense of wonder.
(:^)]
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n957.7 ---------------
From: Adit <adit@main.aquanet.co.il>
Subject: obsessed teenagers?
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 21:03:26 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I want to respond to all the things that Jen wrote about obsessed people
from ages 14-16 and its really NOT what's going on with me and
practically everyone I know. My fourteenth birthday was only about two
weeks ago, and about a month ago I completely stopped with obsessions of
any kind. Since I was 11 I started being obsessed with things
(especially bands at the time) but my biggest obsession was since last
December with the best movie ever- that's according to me is Titanic
(Ok, I know its not the place to say that...) and after it I was only a
little obsessed with HC but I suddenly lost all interest in obsessions-
and I don't think I'll ever be obsessed again, and the same thing pretty
much happened to all my friends that were obsessed. So what I want to
say to you Jen is that I really don't think its a teenagers thing- you
definitely can't blame what you did on that!
-Adit
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n957.8 ---------------
From: "Alisha" <kleinjan@btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: something
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 20:14:32 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Ha ah!
>You tried to mix us up by mixing up the captions, didn't you? You sly
fox
>you.... :)
<ggg> Too many sappy teen magazines, I'm afraid.
>I always thought they looked quite similar. This only serves to
further
>reinfoce my position.
I think they look totally different except for that split second
there...
but I've discussed this with a couple of my friends and opinion has been
divided on exactly how similar they are. Personally, I think it was
just the
hair and the sickness that made them look alike here, but that's just
one
opinion. A friend of a friend said they could be sisters.
Alisha
xoxox
alisha1121@hotmail.com
kleinjan@btinternet.com
http://www.btinternet.com/~f.bean/frontx.htm
"Don't you blame the movies. Movies don't create psychos;
movies make psychos more creative."
- Billy Loomis, 'Scream'
"I really like gratuitous nudity. I hate when people go
'I'll only do it if it makes sense for the movie.' It
never makes sense. So I like it - the more gratuitous
the better."
- David Duchovny. Amen.
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n957.9 ---------------
From: Rosedwson4@aol.com
Subject: Kates acting-- was Re:i want to know...
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 15:21:50 EDT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>And this doesn't even mean that Kate's acting is
stage-oriented, I don't really know this kind of detail about her
background.<<
sorry if this was said already.. i get this in digest!!!
actually.. Kates acting background really is stage oriented as ya put
it.. so
that was a very good observation :-).. she went to a theatre schoool
for high
school (or whatever its called in england.. secondary school or
something like
that...) though she did say she thought drama school was just "a bunch
of
blah-de blah-de bullshit!" LOL... also.. before she did any movies she
did a
lot of stage roles ("Adrian Mole, What the Butler Saw"... a few others
at
school...) so anyways.. just filling that in :-) later all!
love yas!
~Rachel :-)!!!~
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n957.10 ---------------
From: Rosedwson4@aol.com
Subject: Kate and the spiceys?!?!?! LOL!!!
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 15:31:44 EDT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Jean wrote:
>>Nosiree, as someone who's seen both in the flesh, I can honestly say
Nivea's
survey reflects my preferences. <<
hahahahah :-) OOH OOH MINE TOO MINE TOO!!!!! lol... look at that...
everyone
may now flame me for sending just an "I agree" post to the list!!! but
it had
to be said! heh, sorry.. well Ill say more so its not just one line
then--btw.. funny thing.. as you all probably know i absolutely love ya
know.,
meeting actors/bands whatever and all and if i see someone somewhere
ill
always go over and say hi and stuff(Kates the best though! HAVE I
MENTIONED I
JUST LOVE HER! lol.. just had to add that).. but, no offense to spice
girls
fans or anything.. but when i was in a hotel lobby with them last june
(and
heh, it was still 5 of them)... my friend and i just kinda stood,
looked at
them.. and walked the other way! LOL... and sporty as best body?!?!
nothing
too thrilling for me to see...though they were dressed like normal...
hmm
hehehehehe...geez that was off topic!,
love yas!
~Rachel~
--------------- END heavenly-c.v001.n957 ---------------
Date:
Wed, 14 Oct 1998 14:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
From:
heavenly-c-errors@lists.best.comAdd to Address Book
Subject:
Digest heavenly-c.v001.n958
Reply-To:
heavenly-c@lists.best.com
To:
heavenly-c@lists.best.com
-------------- BEGIN heavenly-c.v001.n958 --------------
001 - Rosedwson4@aol.com - Re: Digest heavenly-c.v001.n955
002 - "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@v - Re: i want to know
003 - ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature - Re: what was that?!
004 - ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature - Re: Obsession
005 - ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature - a piece of Mel news!!!
006 - ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature - Re: i want to know
007 - ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature - More $.02 on the Moider Scene
008 - "Jose Antonio Abad Trillo - Re: i want to know
009 - "Jose Antonio Abad Trillo - Re: what was that?!
010 - "Jose Antonio Abad Trillo - Re: how to unsubscribe
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n958.1 ---------------
From: Rosedwson4@aol.com
Subject: Re: Digest heavenly-c.v001.n955
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 15:36:38 EDT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In a message dated 98-10-14 11:11:29 EDT, you write:
> And the scene in the
> NZ and UK cut, where p&j are hiding in the bushes at the ilam garden
> party... it's a very clumsy scene, the acting of kate and even
melanie
> is way below par there.
>
theyre supposed to be drunk in that scene i believe!!!! dont you think
you
come across as weird when youre drunk?!
just for thoughts.. :)
~Rachel ;-)!!!~
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n958.2 ---------------
From: "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@videotron.ca>
Subject: Re: i want to know
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 15:44:53 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
jeroen wrote:
>Like with any film, after a certain number of viewings the emotional
>impact wears off
I agree. This is why I limit the number of times I watch any film. I
watch HC on average once a year now (I saw it 4 times on a big screen
in
a week at the Toronto film fest and four times in theatres on its first
run).
Besides, I learned a long time ago that repeated viewings can take away
from the opportunity of discovering something new.
(:^)]
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n958.3 ---------------
From: ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature@innocent.com>
Subject: Re: what was that?!
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 21:20:41 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <199810140306.UAA25396@lists1.best.com>
<199810141656.JAA01174@lists1.best.com>
Queen Jenny wrote:
> Okay, here's why I put in that one...until about 3 months ago, I used
to
> visit personal home pages, not the "hi, i'm katie, here are some
links and a
> picture of my cat" type, but the poetry writing journal
> my-page-is-more-depressed-than yours sect.
Didn't we all go through that fase?? I won't bore you with mine, but it
ended not too long ago, not the day that I turned 16. Who cares about
age anyway...
Marloes
--
I'm so aware of where I am,
but I don't know where that is
Believe, K's Choice
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n958.4 ---------------
From: ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature@innocent.com>
Subject: Re: Obsession
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 21:16:44 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <199810141642.JAA22837@lists1.best.com>
Alisha wrote:
> Also, while I have your attention [or not, as the case may be], does
anyone
> have a problem with me and my long sig? B/C I've been on mailing lists
> before and I've found it's bothered people having the same sig posted
> several times a day and wasting valuable downloading time.
Doesn't bother me at all, I have one myself all the time...need to
change it more often though!! That one before this was getting on my own
nerves!
But if it bothers people, please say so...thanx
Marloes
--
I'm so aware of where I am,
but I don't know where that is
Believe, K's Choice
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n958.5 ---------------
From: ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature@innocent.com>
Subject: a piece of Mel news!!!
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 21:49:42 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <199810141734.KAA26729@lists1.best.com>
My fellow Creatures....
I just received this message from Mark Kines:
~~~~
Well, I do have a piece of Mel news for you. I just talked to her agent,
trying to find out where she is, and apparently in just 10 days Mel
herself
is coming to L.A. to live here for a month. Then in December she's off
to
do another film. It's called "But I'm a Cheerleader!" I have a feeling
it's
an American film - I doubt any other country has cheerleaders. I have no
idea how big the film is. I think it might be an independent film,
because
the agent I talked to said it wasn't her deal, and that agent is in
charge
of getting Mel the big Hollywood stuff (like "Ever After"). But who
knows?
I suppose I will find out more when Mel arrives. In any event, it's
certainly good news. I doubt she plays a cheerleader though. Stupid
American casting system.
-Mark
~~~~
Weeeeeellll, this is all folks...nite!
Marloes
--
I'm so aware of where I am,
but I don't know where that is
Believe, K's Choice
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n958.6 ---------------
From: ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature@innocent.com>
Subject: Re: i want to know
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 22:02:55 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <199810131834.LAA14858@lists1.best.com>
<199810132018.NAA04993@lists1.best.com>
<199810140752.AAA21511@lists1.best.com>
<199810141140.EAA18091@lists1.best.com>
<199810141825.LAA04681@lists1.best.com>
jeroen wrote:
> Like with any film, after a certain number of viewings the emotional
> impact wears off, and you will start noticing little things like this.
> It sucks, but that's life.
So after how many times did that happen? Cause I'll make sure to stop
watching HC before that time and remember strong the emotions forever.
(and I KNOW I can never keep this promise...*s*)
Marloes
--
I'm so aware of where I am,
but I don't know where that is
Believe, K's Choice
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n958.7 ---------------
From: ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature@innocent.com>
Subject: More $.02 on the Moider Scene
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 22:29:04 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <199810141602.JAA29446@lists1.best.com>
RUbabes@aol.com wrote:
> I think the scene is stunning and does just what it should.
It defenately does. Besides that, I think the story is about the growing
friendship between the friends up to the murder. According to me it's
not a film about violence, although there are some 'violent' aspects in
it.
And also: this is a true story. We can all read and imagine what really
happened, and what it must have looked like. It's horrible enough as it
is. I wouldn't want to see it in this beautiful film. That's just my
opinion of course...
> What is a little interesting irony thing thrown in there,
though....is that
> although they were ordered to 'never meet again', and were jailed
seperately,
> etc etc...they will forever be together in the memory of that crime,
this
> film, etc. They will always be a duo, forever a pair in everyone's
mind. They
> got what they wished for....just in a totally different
method...hmmmmm...:)
You're right, every single article about Anne Perry mentions the event
and Pauline. We will always see them as a pair. What I don't understand
is that they stated they don't feel the need to see eachother again (at
least Anne Perry said that, didn't she?)
Right after I'd seen HC for the first time I couldn't believe that they
had really never met again after they were separated. I just didn't
think that was true. And that's also what most people who saw it
(whether they liked it or not) said to me. They were sure that Pauline
and Juliet were still seeing eachother, or had at least met eachother a
few times...
Anyone alse on this thought the same thing?
bye,
Marloes
--
I'm so aware of where I am,
but I don't know where that is
Believe, K's Choice
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n958.8 ---------------
From: "Jose Antonio Abad Trillo" <jabad@softtek.com>
Subject: Re: i want to know
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 16:36:04 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <199810141942.MAA06107@lists1.best.com>
E. Jean Guerin wrote:
> jeroen wrote:
>
> >Like with any film, after a certain number of viewings the emotional
> >impact wears off
>
> I agree. This is why I limit the number of times I watch any film. I
> watch HC on average once a year now (I saw it 4 times on a big screen
in
> a week at the Toronto film fest and four times in theatres on its
first
> run).
>
> Besides, I learned a long time ago that repeated viewings can take
away
> from the opportunity of discovering something new.
>
> (:^)]
I like to call "magical Elixir" to all that stuff that somehow touches
deep
on me. It can be a song, or a smell or a movie, it can be anything that
stimulates my senses. HC touched me. I've seen it about 20 times, but
as
Jean, now I try to keep it for some other moments, but here is a tip,
never
leave one of this elixirs stored for a long time, because, like
parfumes, it
will loose it's magical power. The last time I saw HC was 2 months
ago. I
just bought the special edition of Titanic and I haven't seen it yet.
I'm
saving it for another special moment.
Yhanks for reading
jose Antonio
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n958.9 ---------------
From: "Jose Antonio Abad Trillo" <jabad@softtek.com>
Subject: Re: what was that?!
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 16:41:18 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <199810141908.MAA10895@lists1.best.com>
E. Jean Guerin wrote:
> Queen Jenny wrote:
>
> >I was the same was with Fairuza Balk...but now i've turned into a
bit of a
> >cynic about the whole bit
>
> By your own admission, this is just a phase in developpment. So don't
> deny that phase to others.
>
> This is another phase of being a teen: spitting on behavior that's
> younger than ours. I know this because I spent my teen years
rejecting a
> lot of things from my childhood. The surprising thing is that later in
> life you begin embracing those things again and all you can think of
is
> how immature and naive you were to think that rejecting your childhood
> would make you mature faster. Doing that just makes you into a jaded
teen
> with no sense of wonder.
>
> (:^)]
and then you regret all the fun stuff you let pass away just because
you wanted
to look more experienced. Now I can say that my teen years are prettey
far
away and I miss some of that strange, intense feelings that made me
feel a
whole life in only one day. When you get older, life gets somehow
boring,
unless you unchain the energy of the teen agers. Just my opinion
Thanks for reading
José Antonio
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n958.10 ---------------
From: "Jose Antonio Abad Trillo" <jabad@softtek.com>
Subject: Re: how to unsubscribe
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 16:51:11 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <199810141438.HAA24052@lists1.best.com>
<199810141636.JAA19269@lists1.best.com>
Jason Schnebly wrote:
> does anyone know how I can drop this mailing list? (no offense)
> schnebly@brookings.net
Send your request to heavenly-c-request@lists.best.com
No subject and type in the body unsubscribe and that's all
What I don't remember is the address, but I guess that was the good one.
JA
--------------- END heavenly-c.v001.n958 ---------------
Date:
Thu, 15 Oct 1998 12:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
From:
heavenly-c-errors@lists.best.comAdd to Address Book
Subject:
Digest heavenly-c.v001.n959
Reply-To:
heavenly-c@lists.best.com
To:
heavenly-c@lists.best.com
-------------- BEGIN heavenly-c.v001.n959 --------------
001 - "Jose Antonio Abad Trillo - Re: Digest heavenly-c.v001.n955
002 - Sandra Bowdler <sbowdler@ - Review of *The Inspector Pitt
Mysteries*
003 - Bao Ly <Refuse_to_be_burn - Holy Grail Pics
004 - Mad4Claire@aol.com - viewing Kate
005 - nbk94@xs4all.nl (jeroen) - Re: Digest heavenly-c.v001.n955
006 - nbk94@xs4all.nl (jeroen) - Re: i want to know
007 - recurring <recurring@yaho - Peter Jackson Site
008 - "Alisha" <kleinjan@btinte - Re: More $.02 on the Moider Scene
009 - joseph <cherian@giasbmc.v - Unsubscribe
010 - ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature - Re: More $.02 on the Moider Scene
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n959.1 ---------------
From: "Jose Antonio Abad Trillo" <jabad@softtek.com>
Subject: Re: Digest heavenly-c.v001.n955
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 16:50:58 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <199810141438.HAA24052@lists1.best.com>
<199810141636.JAA19269@lists1.best.com>
Jason Schnebly wrote:
> does anyone know how I can drop this mailing list? (no offense)
> schnebly@brookings.net
Send your request to heavenly-c-request@lists.best.com
No subject and type in the body unsubscribe and that's all
What I don't remember is the address, but I guess that was the good one.
JA
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n959.2 ---------------
From: Sandra Bowdler <sbowdler@cyllene.uwa.edu.au>
Subject: Review of *The Inspector Pitt Mysteries*
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 10:30:19 +0800 (WST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
The following review comes from the Guardian, an English newspaper. It
is
written by Nancy Banks-Smith, World's Greatest Writer About Television.
Note it mentions Anne Perry but not Pauline Parker, or any other such
thing.
<<
If you enjoy The Inspector Pitt Mysteries (ITV), they will give you a
second helping, so be careful what you say.
This is late-Victorian London. Fog, top hats, moustaches, bustles,
hansom
cabs, street cries and servant girls. You get the general idea.
The men lead seething, subterranean lives. The doctor was drummed out
of
India. The paterfamilias has a secret mistress. The butler has
smuggled
his illegitimate daughter into the house as a maid. The son-in-law of
the
house is sleeping with her. The hellfire preacher flagellates himself
nightly with a cat o' nine tails. The women occupy themselves by taking
Brown Windsor to the the poor and are being strangled. Not necessarily
by
the poor.
Inspector Pitt is played by the rather delicious Eoin McCarthy. Flowing
marmalade hair, soft collar, loose tie. Insubordinate, naturally.
Sometimes your heart goes out to superintendents, incessantly sauced by
their charismatic subordinates.
Pitt, in turn, is comprehensively snubbed by the *bon ton*. ("There
is a
trademans entrance"), including Charlotte, who slays him with her noble
birth. At first.
To cut short your suspense, the hellfire preacher's wife did it. I
cannot
positively tell you why, as her explanation was overlaid with background
music that was in the foreground. No doubt she was upset about
something.
Pitt shot her as she was trying to garotte Charlotte with a cheese wire,
though the intelligent girl had wisely worn a dog collar.
Though Anne Perry is British, her Inspector Pitt stories are far more
popular in the United States than in Britain. Like Prince Edward, whose
company made the film, they have tourist appeal. Somehow you felt the
film was talking to you, but looking over your shoulder at someone else.
>>
cheers
*Rana borovnia*
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n959.3 ---------------
From: Bao Ly <Refuse_to_be_burnt_out@reflection.org>
Subject: Holy Grail Pics
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 22:46:47 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I watched the Holy Grail again the other day. I decided to capture some
stills of the missing scenes from the NAm/UK/OZ versions. I know,
should of done it long time ago for those who've never seen them.
These do not reflect all of the missing or cut scenes, nor are some of
the stills are exact frames from scenes only in the Holy Grail. With
that said, here is a breakdown:
* Borovnian princesses / 'my daughter...and my foster daughter'
* How much is that doggie in the window
* Sick patient coughing blood into a bowl
* The ones I worship sequence / P&J and P&J plasticine figures
* Ilam party / P&J hiding behind scrubs after soaking Dr Bennet & his
wife
* Ilam party / P&J talking about Hilda and Bill Perry
* Ilam party / P&J talking about mummy and daddy
* Bill Perry's arrival/ 'Uh, hullo!'
* P&J on balcony / Going to Hollywood
* P&J on balcony / Moider any odd wives that get in our way
* Dr Hulme dismisal / conference room
* Dr Hulme resignation ceremony / portrait
* Dr Hulme breaking down / sobbing
* The loviest night of the year waltz / extended
* Sin banner / exploding blood
* Honora / why couldn't mother die
* Hebert / father too
* Pauline / make a wish
* Pauline's bloody face - final shot
They are available at: http://k8di.reflection.org/hc/nzhc_pics.asp
Netscape 3.0/4.0/IE 4.0 or above required. (Sorry, testing a few
things)
Enjoy!
Bao
--
http://www.reflection.org
mailto:Refuse_to_be_burnt_out@reflection.org
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n959.4 ---------------
From: Mad4Claire@aol.com
Subject: viewing Kate
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 02:18:18 EDT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
so i was wondering...who all on this list has actually met Kate.
obviously, i
Know that Jean has. but i thinK there are more. i would like to hear yr
stories of how you met her....
~~^^SARAH^^~~
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n959.5 ---------------
From: nbk94@xs4all.nl (jeroen)
Subject: Re: Digest heavenly-c.v001.n955
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 08:23:13 GMT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <199810141938.MAA03388@lists1.best.com>
In-Reply-To: <199810141938.MAA03388@lists1.best.com>
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998 15:36:38 EDT, Rosedwson4@aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 98-10-14 11:11:29 EDT, you write:
>
>> And the scene in the
>> NZ and UK cut, where p&j are hiding in the bushes at the ilam garden
>> party... it's a very clumsy scene, the acting of kate and even
melanie
>> is way below par there.
>
>theyre supposed to be drunk in that scene i believe!!!!
Are they? I don't think so. But, let's say they are, then i'm still
not happy with the acting. It just has a very childish, school play
kinda quality to it, they are just reading their lines, there's no
emotion.
And what's with all the exclamation marks?
>dont you think you come across as weird when youre drunk?!
Weird is good. Bad acting isn't, especially when you're in a movie.
--
Jeroen - The Netherlands - www.xs4all.nl/~nbk94
All the best people have bad chests and bone diseases.
It's all frightfully romantic! - Heavenly Creatures
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n959.6 ---------------
From: nbk94@xs4all.nl (jeroen)
Subject: Re: i want to know
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 08:23:12 GMT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <199810131834.LAA14858@lists1.best.com>
<199810132018.NAA04993@lists1.best.com>
<199810140752.AAA21511@lists1.best.com>
<199810141140.EAA18091@lists1.best.com>
<199810141825.LAA04681@lists1.best.com>
<199810142040.NAA16969@lists1.best.com>
In-Reply-To: <199810142040.NAA16969@lists1.best.com>
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998 22:02:55 +0200, ~lyric~
<heavenlycreature@innocent.com> wrote:
>jeroen wrote:
>
>> Like with any film, after a certain number of viewings the emotional
>> impact wears off, and you will start noticing little things like
this.
>> It sucks, but that's life.
>
>So after how many times did that happen? Cause I'll make sure to stop
>watching HC before that time and remember strong the emotions forever.
>(and I KNOW I can never keep this promise...*s*)
For me it happened around the 50th viewing, 2-3 months after the first
time i saw it. By the time i'd seen it another 50 times i got a
little tired of it and now i pop in the laserdisc maybe once every 3
months, only when i'm really in the mood. You could say i have a more
healthy, matured relationship with HC now, albeit a bit boring.
The only film i don't think i will ever grow tired of is NBK. I think
that's because every single frame in that film is a piece of art by
itself.
--
Jeroen - The Netherlands - www.xs4all.nl/~nbk94
All the best people have bad chests and bone diseases.
It's all frightfully romantic! - Heavenly Creatures
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n959.7 ---------------
From: recurring <recurring@yahoo.com>
Subject: Peter Jackson Site
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 06:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Dear Creatures,
Whilst surfing the net I came across this wonderfully expansive Peter
Jackson site. I'm not sure how long it's been up - I haven't searched
for him in a long time - but it's really great and worth checking out
at:
http://members.xoom.com/lv4/
Later,
Jane
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n959.8 ---------------
From: "Alisha" <kleinjan@btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: More $.02 on the Moider Scene
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 18:16:25 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>You're right, every single article about Anne Perry mentions the event
>and Pauline. We will always see them as a pair. What I don't understand
>is that they stated they don't feel the need to see eachother again (at
>least Anne Perry said that, didn't she?)
>Right after I'd seen HC for the first time I couldn't believe that they
>had really never met again after they were separated. I just didn't
>think that was true. And that's also what most people who saw it
>(whether they liked it or not) said to me. They were sure that Pauline
>and Juliet were still seeing eachother, or had at least met eachother a
>few times...
>Anyone alse on this thought the same thing?
My friend Laura couldn't comprehend the idea that they wouldn't want to
meet
again, but I think I can sort of understand it. Whether or not I can
put my
thoughts into words is another matter. I'll get back to you on that.
A
xoxox
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n959.9 ---------------
From: joseph <cherian@giasbmc.vsnl.net.in>
Subject: Unsubscribe
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 1998 02:37:57 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <199810142158.OAA22147@lists1.best.com>
Please unsubscribe me from this mailing list.
Thank You.
heavenly-c-errors@lists.best.com wrote:
> -------------- BEGIN heavenly-c.v001.n958 --------------
>
> 001 - Rosedwson4@aol.com - Re: Digest heavenly-c.v001.n955
> 002 - "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@v - Re: i want to know
> 003 - ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature - Re: what was that?!
> 004 - ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature - Re: Obsession
> 005 - ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature - a piece of Mel news!!!
> 006 - ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature - Re: i want to know
> 007 - ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature - More $.02 on the Moider Scene
> 008 - "Jose Antonio Abad Trillo - Re: i want to know
> 009 - "Jose Antonio Abad Trillo - Re: what was that?!
> 010 - "Jose Antonio Abad Trillo - Re: how to unsubscribe
>
> --------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n958.1 ---------------
>
> From: Rosedwson4@aol.com
> Subject: Re: Digest heavenly-c.v001.n955
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 15:36:38 EDT
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> In a message dated 98-10-14 11:11:29 EDT, you write:
>
> > And the scene in the
> > NZ and UK cut, where p&j are hiding in the bushes at the ilam
garden
> > party... it's a very clumsy scene, the acting of kate and even
melanie
> > is way below par there.
> >
>
> theyre supposed to be drunk in that scene i believe!!!! dont you
think you
> come across as weird when youre drunk?!
> just for thoughts.. :)
> ~Rachel ;-)!!!~
>
> --------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n958.2 ---------------
>
> From: "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@videotron.ca>
> Subject: Re: i want to know
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 15:44:53 -0400
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> jeroen wrote:
>
> >Like with any film, after a certain number of viewings the emotional
> >impact wears off
>
> I agree. This is why I limit the number of times I watch any film. I
> watch HC on average once a year now (I saw it 4 times on a big screen
in
> a week at the Toronto film fest and four times in theatres on its
first
> run).
>
> Besides, I learned a long time ago that repeated viewings can take
away
> from the opportunity of discovering something new.
>
> (:^)]
>
> --------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n958.3 ---------------
>
> From: ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature@innocent.com>
> Subject: Re: what was that?!
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 21:20:41 +0200
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> References: <199810140306.UAA25396@lists1.best.com>
<199810141656.JAA01174@lists1.best.com>
>
> Queen Jenny wrote:
>
> > Okay, here's why I put in that one...until about 3 months ago, I
used to
> > visit personal home pages, not the "hi, i'm katie, here are some
links and a
> > picture of my cat" type, but the poetry writing journal
> > my-page-is-more-depressed-than yours sect.
>
> Didn't we all go through that fase?? I won't bore you with mine, but
it
> ended not too long ago, not the day that I turned 16. Who cares about
> age anyway...
>
> Marloes
>
> --
> I'm so aware of where I am,
> but I don't know where that is
>
> Believe, K's Choice
>
> --------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n958.4 ---------------
>
> From: ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature@innocent.com>
> Subject: Re: Obsession
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 21:16:44 +0200
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> References: <199810141642.JAA22837@lists1.best.com>
>
> Alisha wrote:
>
> > Also, while I have your attention [or not, as the case may be],
does anyone
> > have a problem with me and my long sig? B/C I've been on mailing
lists
> > before and I've found it's bothered people having the same sig
posted
> > several times a day and wasting valuable downloading time.
>
> Doesn't bother me at all, I have one myself all the time...need to
> change it more often though!! That one before this was getting on my
own
> nerves!
> But if it bothers people, please say so...thanx
>
> Marloes
>
> --
> I'm so aware of where I am,
> but I don't know where that is
>
> Believe, K's Choice
>
> --------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n958.5 ---------------
>
> From: ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature@innocent.com>
> Subject: a piece of Mel news!!!
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 21:49:42 +0200
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> References: <199810141734.KAA26729@lists1.best.com>
>
> My fellow Creatures....
>
> I just received this message from Mark Kines:
>
> ~~~~
>
> Well, I do have a piece of Mel news for you. I just talked to her
agent,
> trying to find out where she is, and apparently in just 10 days Mel
> herself
> is coming to L.A. to live here for a month. Then in December she's off
> to
> do another film. It's called "But I'm a Cheerleader!" I have a feeling
> it's
> an American film - I doubt any other country has cheerleaders. I have
no
> idea how big the film is. I think it might be an independent film,
> because
> the agent I talked to said it wasn't her deal, and that agent is in
> charge
> of getting Mel the big Hollywood stuff (like "Ever After"). But who
> knows?
> I suppose I will find out more when Mel arrives. In any event, it's
> certainly good news. I doubt she plays a cheerleader though. Stupid
> American casting system.
>
> -Mark
>
> ~~~~
>
> Weeeeeellll, this is all folks...nite!
>
> Marloes
>
> --
> I'm so aware of where I am,
> but I don't know where that is
>
> Believe, K's Choice
>
> --------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n958.6 ---------------
>
> From: ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature@innocent.com>
> Subject: Re: i want to know
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 22:02:55 +0200
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> References: <199810131834.LAA14858@lists1.best.com>
<199810132018.NAA04993@lists1.best.com>
<199810140752.AAA21511@lists1.best.com>
<199810141140.EAA18091@lists1.best.com>
<199810141825.LAA04681@lists1.best.com>
>
> jeroen wrote:
>
> > Like with any film, after a certain number of viewings the emotional
> > impact wears off, and you will start noticing little things like
this.
> > It sucks, but that's life.
>
> So after how many times did that happen? Cause I'll make sure to stop
> watching HC before that time and remember strong the emotions forever.
> (and I KNOW I can never keep this promise...*s*)
>
> Marloes
>
> --
> I'm so aware of where I am,
> but I don't know where that is
>
> Believe, K's Choice
>
> --------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n958.7 ---------------
>
> From: ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature@innocent.com>
> Subject: More $.02 on the Moider Scene
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 22:29:04 +0200
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> References: <199810141602.JAA29446@lists1.best.com>
>
> RUbabes@aol.com wrote:
>
> > I think the scene is stunning and does just what it should.
>
> It defenately does. Besides that, I think the story is about the
growing
> friendship between the friends up to the murder. According to me it's
> not a film about violence, although there are some 'violent' aspects
in
> it.
> And also: this is a true story. We can all read and imagine what
really
> happened, and what it must have looked like. It's horrible enough as
it
> is. I wouldn't want to see it in this beautiful film. That's just my
> opinion of course...
>
> > What is a little interesting irony thing thrown in there,
though....is that
> > although they were ordered to 'never meet again', and were jailed
seperately,
> > etc etc...they will forever be together in the memory of that
crime, this
> > film, etc. They will always be a duo, forever a pair in everyone's
mind. They
> > got what they wished for....just in a totally different
method...hmmmmm...:)
>
> You're right, every single article about Anne Perry mentions the event
> and Pauline. We will always see them as a pair. What I don't
understand
> is that they stated they don't feel the need to see eachother again
(at
> least Anne Perry said that, didn't she?)
> Right after I'd seen HC for the first time I couldn't believe that
they
> had really never met again after they were separated. I just didn't
> think that was true. And that's also what most people who saw it
> (whether they liked it or not) said to me. They were sure that Pauline
> and Juliet were still seeing eachother, or had at least met eachother
a
> few times...
> Anyone alse on this thought the same thing?
>
> bye,
> Marloes
>
> --
> I'm so aware of where I am,
> but I don't know where that is
>
> Believe, K's Choice
>
> --------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n958.8 ---------------
>
> From: "Jose Antonio Abad Trillo" <jabad@softtek.com>
> Subject: Re: i want to know
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 16:36:04 -0500
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> References: <199810141942.MAA06107@lists1.best.com>
>
> E. Jean Guerin wrote:
>
> > jeroen wrote:
> >
> > >Like with any film, after a certain number of viewings the
emotional
> > >impact wears off
> >
> > I agree. This is why I limit the number of times I watch any film. I
> > watch HC on average once a year now (I saw it 4 times on a big
screen in
> > a week at the Toronto film fest and four times in theatres on its
first
> > run).
> >
> > Besides, I learned a long time ago that repeated viewings can take
away
> > from the opportunity of discovering something new.
> >
> > (:^)]
>
> I like to call "magical Elixir" to all that stuff that somehow
touches deep
> on me. It can be a song, or a smell or a movie, it can be anything
that
> stimulates my senses. HC touched me. I've seen it about 20 times,
but as
> Jean, now I try to keep it for some other moments, but here is a tip,
never
> leave one of this elixirs stored for a long time, because, like
parfumes, it
> will loose it's magical power. The last time I saw HC was 2 months
ago. I
> just bought the special edition of Titanic and I haven't seen it yet.
I'm
> saving it for another special moment.
>
> Yhanks for reading
>
> jose Antonio
>
> --------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n958.9 ---------------
>
> From: "Jose Antonio Abad Trillo" <jabad@softtek.com>
> Subject: Re: what was that?!
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 16:41:18 -0500
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> References: <199810141908.MAA10895@lists1.best.com>
>
> E. Jean Guerin wrote:
>
> > Queen Jenny wrote:
> >
> > >I was the same was with Fairuza Balk...but now i've turned into a
bit of a
> > >cynic about the whole bit
> >
> > By your own admission, this is just a phase in developpment. So
don't
> > deny that phase to others.
> >
> > This is another phase of being a teen: spitting on behavior that's
> > younger than ours. I know this because I spent my teen years
rejecting a
> > lot of things from my childhood. The surprising thing is that later
in
> > life you begin embracing those things again and all you can think
of is
> > how immature and naive you were to think that rejecting your
childhood
> > would make you mature faster. Doing that just makes you into a
jaded teen
> > with no sense of wonder.
> >
> > (:^)]
>
> and then you regret all the fun stuff you let pass away just because
you wanted
> to look more experienced. Now I can say that my teen years are
prettey far
> away and I miss some of that strange, intense feelings that made me
feel a
> whole life in only one day. When you get older, life gets somehow
boring,
> unless you unchain the energy of the teen agers. Just my opinion
>
> Thanks for reading
>
> José Antonio
>
> --------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n958.10 ---------------
>
> From: "Jose Antonio Abad Trillo" <jabad@softtek.com>
> Subject: Re: how to unsubscribe
> Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 16:51:11 -0500
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> References: <199810141438.HAA24052@lists1.best.com>
<199810141636.JAA19269@lists1.best.com>
>
> Jason Schnebly wrote:
>
> > does anyone know how I can drop this mailing list? (no offense)
> > schnebly@brookings.net
>
> Send your request to heavenly-c-request@lists.best.com
>
> No subject and type in the body unsubscribe and that's all
> What I don't remember is the address, but I guess that was the good
one.
> JA
>
> --------------- END heavenly-c.v001.n958 ---------------
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n959.10 ---------------
From: ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature@innocent.com>
Subject: Re: More $.02 on the Moider Scene
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 21:47:12 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <199810151718.KAA22270@lists1.best.com>
Alisha wrote:
> My friend Laura couldn't comprehend the idea that they wouldn't want
to meet
> again, but I think I can sort of understand it. Whether or not I can
put my
> thoughts into words is another matter. I'll get back to you on that.
Yes, please do so! Of course I do respect the fact that they live
seperate lifes, and don't want to meet eachother. But I really REALLY
can't understand it, no matter from which way I look at it... I think I
understand that the incredible friendship and the dreams they shared
were gone after the whole event. But why wouldn't you want to meet the
one person who meant so much to you long ago? If only once...
Do you think that even though they aren't allowed and/or don't want to
see each other, they still know about how the other is doing?? Would
someone keep them updated? I dunno, just a thought...
Take care,
Marloes
--
I'm so aware of where I am,
but I don't know where that is
Believe, K's Choice
--------------- END heavenly-c.v001.n959 ---------------
Date:
Fri, 16 Oct 1998 07:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:
heavenly-c-errors@lists.best.comAdd to Address Book
Subject:
Digest heavenly-c.v001.n960
Reply-To:
heavenly-c@lists.best.com
To:
heavenly-c@lists.best.com
-------------- BEGIN heavenly-c.v001.n960 --------------
001 - "Eileene Coscolluela" <ec - Re: More $.02 on the Moider Scene
002 - "Marie Braden" <braden@ms - RE: More $.02 on the Moider Scene
003 - "Marie Braden" <braden@ms - Is it Just Me?
004 - Mad4Claire@aol.com - um..hey!
005 - "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@v - Re: More $.02 on the Moider Scene
006 - "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@v - Re: Is it Just Me?
007 - ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature - Re: um..hey!
008 - ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature - Re: Is it Just Me?
009 - Phil West <pgw16@hermes.c - Re: More $.02 on the Moider Scene
010 - Adit <adit@main.aquanet.c - murder
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n960.1 ---------------
From: "Eileene Coscolluela" <ecoscolluela@kinderhook.com>
Subject: Re: More $.02 on the Moider Scene
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 15:56:50 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
I can definitely understand why Ms. Perry wouldn't want to meet Pauline
again...
It's a traumatic chapter in their lives. The trial brought that to a
close
and they were both incarcerated. Both spent their time educating
themselves and trying to get their lives to move ahead with their lives.
They had nothing but to look forward... and never look back. Atleast,
that
is what I would have done.
To me, I feel sad towards the pair. It doesn't make sense to the
logical
me... especially knowing how bright and talented both girls were. It
strikes me as odd that these two bright girls couldn't think of *better*
alternatives.
Eileene =)
iko@woolgathering.net
www.woolgathering.net
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n960.2 ---------------
From: "Marie Braden" <braden@msw0.attnet.or.jp>
Subject: RE: More $.02 on the Moider Scene
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 06:01:14 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <199810151718.KAA22270@lists1.best.com>
> >You're right, every single article about Anne Perry mentions the
event
> >and Pauline. We will always see them as a pair. What I don't
understand
> >is that they stated they don't feel the need to see eachother again
(at
> >least Anne Perry said that, didn't she?)
> >Right after I'd seen HC for the first time I couldn't believe that
they
> >had really never met again after they were separated. I just didn't
> >think that was true. And that's also what most people who saw it
> >(whether they liked it or not) said to me. They were sure that
Pauline
> >and Juliet were still seeing eachother, or had at least met
eachother a
> >few times...
Two schools of thought here: One is that I would probably at least be
*curious* as to how life had treated someone who had been so much to me
(then again, I recently found a phone number for, and called up my very
first boyfriend, to whom I'd not spoken since 1987....just to find out
how
he was, and to tell him how much his friendship had meant to me)
The other school of thought is that after something as horrific as the
killing, one might not wish to be reminded of it...it was a very bad
time in
both their lives....both their worlds crumbled....I know that I don't
have
any real desire to look up some of the people who shared some of my
other
worst times...I've grown beyond that, and don't want to be reminded of
them...imagine how much worse it must be for someone whose "worst
times" got
international publicity.
So....I would imagine that they probably really never have felt the
need to
see each other again...but I wouldn't be surprised if either or both at
least knew a bit of "Whatever Happened To...?"
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n960.3 ---------------
From: "Marie Braden" <braden@msw0.attnet.or.jp>
Subject: Is it Just Me?
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 06:03:58 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Perhaps I'll understand better, once I've seen "the grail"...but the
still
shots of Pauline fantasizing the murder of Honora and Bert make it look
as
if it is being played for laughs....I'll reserve judgement 'till I've
seen
the whole thing, but I think I understand why that scene at least got
cut.
The still shot of Honora lying across the table is almost ludicrously
funny
in a morbid kind of way.....and it seems to me that it would "cheapen"
the
horror of what actually happened.
But...to start another thread....how did you come to see HC? What led
you
to it?
In my case, I saw the slip case every night at the video store where I
used
to work...and was intrigued by the teaser copy. Then, a year and a half
later, someone mentioned the flick on the cult movies
newsgroup....which led
me to the FAQ....when I read the FAQ, it struck some chord in me of
...well,
remembrance....(I guess I must have read about the case when I was
younger
and devoured books about true crime)....plus, it sounded like a
well-done
flick, full of thought, etc. So I rented it three times before I
actually
sat down and watched it.
But as soon as I did, I knew I had to own it.
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n960.4 ---------------
From: Mad4Claire@aol.com
Subject: um..hey!
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 18:02:11 EDT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
is anyone ever going to help me see that titanic Kate doll. i really
want to
see it!!! even if it is crappy.
~~^^SARAH^^~~
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n960.5 ---------------
From: "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@videotron.ca>
Subject: Re: More $.02 on the Moider Scene
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 18:33:28 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
I think it would help to understand the Parker-Hulme case to make this
point about HC:
The sympathy you feel towards the girls is based on the film which
broke
from the traditionnal view of these girls as monsters by portraying
them
as healthy young girls with the same hopes, dreams and fears that most
girls do.
Their behavior portrayal is not a roadmap to matricide. It's more to
show
their human side.
The film doesn't caution against being a teen. It actually celebrates
that. The tragic part comes from teenage melodrama spinning out of
control as a result of having so many different layers to the truth
that
it would drive anyone batty. (Pauline finds out she was born out of
wedlock. Juliet finds out her parents idyllic marriage is but a
facade...)
Obsesions in teens comes from the strength of their emotions. The
discovery of new things can be so overwhelming that it's easy to think
:"This is it!"
This is an easy assumption to make as life experience has yet to make
such discoveries more commonplace. Your first love (whether a person or
a
movie) is rarely your only love. However, you need a bit of life
experience to get a sense of proportion. At age 17 you think that if
you
don't get to kiss that person or see that movie, you'll die. At age 35,
you go out looking for new people and experiences and rent films you've
never seen before.
(:^)]
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n960.6 ---------------
From: "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@videotron.ca>
Subject: Re: Is it Just Me?
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 18:54:06 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Marie Braden wrote:
>.but the still
>shots of Pauline fantasizing the murder of Honora and Bert make it
look as
>if it is being played for laughs.
It is. And the punch line to the scene is wonderfully ghoulish.
>...I'll reserve judgement 'till I've seen
>the whole thing, but I think I understand why that scene at least got
cut.
>The still shot of Honora lying across the table is almost ludicrously
funny
>in a morbid kind of way.....and it seems to me that it would "cheapen"
the
>horror of what actually happened.
It doesn't. It contrasts with the real murder and explains a bit why
Pauline thought she could get away with it. She has no idea what death
looks like at that point. She just thinks she's really clever.
(:^)]
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n960.7 ---------------
From: ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature@innocent.com>
Subject: Re: um..hey!
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 10:29:48 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <199810152214.PAA18908@lists1.best.com>
Mad4Claire@aol.com wrote:
>
> is anyone ever going to help me see that titanic Kate doll. i really
want to
> see it!!! even if it is crappy.
I've been looking for it as well!! Because I wanted to show it to a
friend at school. I got an idea...gonna search through my cache when I
come home tonight and I'll send it to ya if I can find it, k?
Take care,
Marloes
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n960.8 ---------------
From: ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature@innocent.com>
Subject: Re: Is it Just Me?
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 10:38:04 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <199810152054.NAA22742@lists1.best.com>
Marie Braden wrote:
> The still shot of Honora lying across the table is almost ludicrously
funny
> in a morbid kind of way.....and it seems to me that it would
"cheapen" the
> horror of what actually happened.
That's exactly what I thought...Could someone tell me more about this
scene? Were Pauline and Juliet making fun of it? Were they serious?? To
me the images look as if they are taken from some comedy...
> But...to start another thread....how did you come to see HC? What
led you
> to it?
I think I've told this before, but anyway.... I read about HC in the
TV-magazine, it was the picture of Pauline and Juliet in the wood that
drawed my attention, I put thick circles around it and forgot all about
it untill I was babysitting and saw the film starting on BBC. I saw the
first 2 mins and got called away...by the time I got back downstairs it
was like 30 mins later so I decided not to watch it anymore and zapped
to another film (incredibly boring one btw)...When Iwoke up the next
morning I found that my mom had taped it for me because she saw the
circles in the magazine...I watched it during my breakfast......
Bye,
Marloes
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n960.9 ---------------
From: Phil West <pgw16@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: More $.02 on the Moider Scene
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 15:05:12 +0100 (BST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <199810152246.PAA17075@lists1.best.com>
Jean wrote:
> Obsesions in teens comes from the strength of their emotions. The
> discovery of new things can be so overwhelming that it's easy to
think
> :"This is it!"
Oh God yes, as Juliet might say. I was obsessively obsessive, too, as a
teenager: girls, bands, books, girls... It'll probably make me sound
ancient and crumbly, but I am quite relieved to have made it to mid-20s.
> At age 17 you think that if you
> don't get to kiss that person or see that movie, you'll die. At age
35,
> you go out looking for new people and experiences and rent films
you've
> never seen before.
This is really perceptive about the strengths of HC and about growing
up.
Watching HC aged 24 (which was how old I was the first time) often felt
like a prolonged and tragic farewell to an old, obsessive self which, I
thought, was also the spontaneous, anarchic side of me which made me
interesting. At once painful and liberating. That's why I found the
written epilogue so affecting, because it points out that something was
lost forever when P&J committed the murder. They ruled out so many
things
from their future lives by succumbing to their worst fears.
To end on a cheerful note, it's definitely not the case that when you
say
goodbye to some of that obsessive, eruptive energy that you turn into
some
kind of total bore. That's always what I feared, but it just ain't
true.
Not completely anyway (said Phil, easing on his slippers and reaching
for
the cocoa). You just learning how to cope with it all. Confessions over!
:)
Cheers,
Phil
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n960.10 ---------------
From: Adit <adit@main.aquanet.co.il>
Subject: murder
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 16:25:26 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>I'd like to know how the moider scene affected you all
I thought the murder was absolutely horrible! I just didn't understand
why Pauline hated her mother so much. I mean, if anyone had to be
killed- it should have been Juliet's mother! I thought she was much more
awful than Honora. She didn't care at all about her daughter- Honora
did! In fact on the first time I saw it I didn't know which mother is
going to be murdered so I was sure its Juliet's mother. On the other 3
times I saw it I always felt so bad for her... What do you all think
about this?
-Adit
--------------- END heavenly-c.v001.n960 ---------------
Date:
Fri, 16 Oct 1998 15:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
From:
heavenly-c-errors@lists.best.comAdd to Address Book
Subject:
Digest heavenly-c.v001.n961
Reply-To:
heavenly-c@lists.best.com
To:
heavenly-c@lists.best.com
-------------- BEGIN heavenly-c.v001.n961 --------------
001 - "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@v - Re: More $.02 on the Moider Scene
002 - "Alisha" <kleinjan@btinte - Marriage!
003 - "Alisha" <kleinjan@btinte - Re: murder
004 - hanna bervoets <hanna-b@d - Re: murder
005 - hanna bervoets <hanna-b@d - Re: Is it Just Me?
006 - "B & B Library LIB-APCO" - Re: Marriage!
007 - Mad4Claire@aol.com - Re: Is it Just Me?
008 - "Alisha" <kleinjan@btinte - Re: Is it Just Me?
009 - Mad4Claire@aol.com - Re: Is it Just Me?
010 - RUbabes@aol.com - KW-Engagement
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n961.1 ---------------
From: "E. Jean Guerin" <orson@videotron.ca>
Subject: Re: More $.02 on the Moider Scene
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 10:51:53 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Phil West wrote:
>To end on a cheerful note, it's definitely not the case that when you
say
>goodbye to some of that obsessive, eruptive energy that you turn into
some
>kind of total bore.
Absolutely. It's not like you enjoy things less. It's like you are
aware
of so many things to enjoy that you don't want to miss out. You don't
expect everything to be "it!" but once in a while, a nice surprise
happens.
To me,it happened on my 18th birthday. That night I broke from my usual
"sci-fi" obsession to go see "North by Northwest" at a repertory
cinema.
That movie made me thrill more than any modern special effects had. It
also was the beginning of my Hitchcock obsession.
If anything, moderating my enthusiam ensures I don't burn out on it.
(:^)]
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n961.2 ---------------
From: "Alisha" <kleinjan@btinternet.com>
Subject: Marriage!
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 17:45:46 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Has anyone else heard about Kate Winslet getting married? I saw it on
the
front of a newspaper today but my father (ever the slavedriver)
wouldn't let
me stop to read it. Any info anybody?
Alisha
xoxox
alisha1121@hotmail.com
kleinjan@btinternet.com
http://www.btinternet.com/~f.bean/frontx.htm
"Don't you blame the movies. Movies don't create psychos;
movies make psychos more creative."
- Billy Loomis, 'Scream'
"I really like gratuitous nudity. I hate when people go
'I'll only do it if it makes sense for the movie.' It
never makes sense. So I like it - the more gratuitous
the better."
- David Duchovny. Amen.
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n961.3 ---------------
From: "Alisha" <kleinjan@btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: murder
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 17:48:52 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>I'd like to know how the moider scene affected you all
>
>I thought the murder was absolutely horrible! I just didn't understand
>why Pauline hated her mother so much. I mean, if anyone had to be
>killed- it should have been Juliet's mother! I thought she was much
more
>awful than Honora. She didn't care at all about her daughter- Honora
>did! In fact on the first time I saw it I didn't know which mother is
>going to be murdered so I was sure its Juliet's mother. On the other 3
>times I saw it I always felt so bad for her... What do you all think
>about this?
I didn't see either of them as 'awful'; not any more than any teenager
would
consider their mother awful. After all, Hilda was practically the only
person who wasn't trying to discourage the girls' friendship, wasn't
she?
But I don't think Honora was that bad either - she was only being a
mother.
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n961.4 ---------------
From: hanna bervoets <hanna-b@dds.nl>
Subject: Re: murder
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 19:06:05 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
At 16:25 16-10-98 +0200, you wrote:
>>I'd like to know how the moider scene affected you all
>
>I thought the murder was absolutely horrible! I just didn't understand
>why Pauline hated her mother so much. I mean, if anyone had to be
>killed- it should have been Juliet's mother! I thought she was much
more
>awful than Honora. She didn't care at all about her daughter- Honora
>did! In fact on the first time I saw it I didn't know which mother is
>going to be murdered so I was sure its Juliet's mother. On the other 3
>times I saw it I always felt so bad for her... What do you all think
>about this?
>-Adit
Hmmm, I dunno..I don't think Juliet's mother was that afwul, and I
think she
did care about Juliet. So did Honora of course, and it's horrible that
she
got killed. I didn't really feel bad for her the first time I saw HC
though,
but when I saw it a few times more I did.
I believe both mothers cared about their daughters a lot but just didn't
show them that the right way...
Hanna
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n961.5 ---------------
From: hanna bervoets <hanna-b@dds.nl>
Subject: Re: Is it Just Me?
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 19:06:03 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
At 10:38 16-10-98 +0100, you wrote:
>> But...to start another thread....how did you come to see HC? What
led you
>> to it?
I remember how I was just lying in my bed, trying to get some sleep
when I
decited to turn the T.V on [because I couldn't get to sleep anyway..]
There
were 2 things I wanted to watch; one of 'em was this show called
"Filmspot"
where they review movies, and the other thing was HC. All I knew about
this
movie was, that it was about a friendship between 2 girls who "made up"
their own world. That's the only thing the T.V guide said..Anyway I
choose
to watch HC, 'cus I noticed that there would be a re-run of Filmspot the
next day [If it wasn't for that re-run I wouldn't even have watched HC!]
During the movie I just kept thinking;"I don't want this movie to end"
and I
kept looking at my alarm clock to see how much longer the movie would
take
[I wanted it to take forever of course]
I just loved it so much! Right after it had ended I wanted to see it
again,
so I got it on video the next day and watched it every day for one
week. [
[Now I watch it once a week]
Ok, that was my little story..
Hanna
-hanna-b@dds.nl-
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n961.6 ---------------
From: "B & B Library LIB-APCO" <LIB-APCO@balch.com>
Subject: Re: Marriage!
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 12:11:38 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Kate Winslet Engaged
Kate Winslet's heart will go on, but not with
Leonardo DiCaprio. The 23-year-old Titanic
star announced Friday that she's engaged to
marry her 24-year-old boyfriend, Jim
Threapleton.
"When you know [you are in love], you know,"
Winslet tells London's Daily Mirror. "That's
what I've been told all my life and now I know."
The Oscar-nominated actress tells the paper
that she and Threapleton, an assistant film
director, have been secretly engaged since last
summer. The two met
a year ago in Morocco, where Kate was starring in
the upcoming
drama Hideous Kinky, in which she plays a
free-spirited mother of
two little girls.
Winslet says it was love at first sight. "I knew
instantly*instantly. I
thought, 'Yep, I'll have that.'" Threapleton, who
has been living in
Winslet's London pad since the spring, placed a
simple white gold
ring with tiny diamonds on her finger. OK, so
it's not exactly the
"Heart of the Ocean" necklace she wore in the
movie, but it's nice
nonetheless.
No date has been set for the nuptials, and
Winslet warns the paper
not to expect a big wedding anytime soon. The
actress, who's also
starring in Holy Smoke for director Jane Campion,
says she's much
too busy to tie the knot before the end of the
year. Winslet hinted that
she could take that long walk down the aisle next
summer.
And speaking of Kate, the actress isn't exactly
thrilled that she was
dubbed "Body of the Year" in a recent poll in
England. She says she
finds the whole thing "a little irritating."
"Why do we keep talking about women's bodies all
the time,
particularly actresses?" Winslet said Thursday on
Clive Anderson's
All Talk TV show.
"I'm a normal human being, and we all go up and
down," Winslet
explains of her ever-changing figure. "The weight
stuff that goes on in
the papers just makes me ill because there are so
many young girls
out there whose minds are being so messed up by
this, and I just think
it is upsetting and it should just stop."
>>> "Alisha" <kleinjan@btinternet.com> 10/16 11:45 AM >>>
Has anyone else heard about Kate Winslet getting married? I saw it on
the
front of a newspaper today but my father (ever the slavedriver)
wouldn't let
me stop to read it. Any info anybody?
Alisha
xoxox
alisha1121@hotmail.com
kleinjan@btinternet.com
http://www.btinternet.com/~f.bean/frontx.htm
"Don't you blame the movies. Movies don't create psychos;
movies make psychos more creative."
- Billy Loomis, 'Scream'
"I really like gratuitous nudity. I hate when people go
'I'll only do it if it makes sense for the movie.' It
never makes sense. So I like it - the more gratuitous
the better."
- David Duchovny. Amen.
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n961.7 ---------------
From: Mad4Claire@aol.com
Subject: Re: Is it Just Me?
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 15:08:56 EDT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
SORRY! that message sent before i was through! let me start again!
how did i come to see HC? i met Jesse on AOL and talKed to her for
awhile.
she was telling me how obsessed she was with Kate and strongly
recommended
that i see HC. i went out that nite and rented it. and my life has
never been
the same! it is my absolute favourite movie. i talK about it to
everyone all
the time. i used to watch it every single nite! sometimes even twice in
a row.
thanK goodness i have calmed myself down now! ha!
under Jesse's recommendation again..that is how i came to see Jude and
Hamlet
too! what a wonderful girl that Jesse is! now...i am in love with Kate
so its
all Jesse's fault! j/k....
that's it
~~^^SARAH^^~~
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n961.8 ---------------
From: "Alisha" <kleinjan@btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Is it Just Me?
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 20:52:13 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> But...to start another thread....how did you come to see HC? What
led
you
>> to it?
Kate. At the time HC was aired on tv, I thought Titanic was the best
film
imaginable and I thought KW was just sensational. I almost definitely
wouldn't have watched it if she wasn't in it. I was very much more
impressed
by HC than I was by Titanic, or any other movie for that matter; but it
did
take me a few watches before I got really into it. I always get like
that
when I see a movie that's a true story - I always want to know more,
and as
soon as I'd read the FAQ, I just had to watch it again and again...
Quite
disasterous really since I accidentally taped over the beginning up
until
the Port Levy incident. Strangely enough, everyone else I know disliked
it,
except my best friend, but I guess that just goes to show how much more
'brilliantly clever' she is than the rest of the world.
Alisha
xoxox
alisha1121@hotmail.com
kleinjan@btinternet.com
http://www.btinternet.com/~f.bean/frontx.htm
"Don't you blame the movies. Movies don't create psychos;
movies make psychos more creative."
- Billy Loomis, 'Scream'
"I really like gratuitous nudity. I hate when people go
'I'll only do it if it makes sense for the movie.' It
never makes sense. So I like it - the more gratuitous
the better."
- David Duchovny. Amen.
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n961.9 ---------------
From: Mad4Claire@aol.com
Subject: Re: Is it Just Me?
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 14:57:25 EDT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
how was i lead into seeing HC? luck
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n961.10 ---------------
From: RUbabes@aol.com
Subject: KW-Engagement
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 17:25:04 EDT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Just found this at the Yahoo news site...from E online...:)
Congrats are in order!!!
-Jesse :)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Kate Winslet Engaged
Friday October 16 2:55 PM ET
Kate Winslet Engaged
So much for the free-wheeling, devil-may-care spinster lifestyle her
ninetysomething Titanic alter-ego Rose had all planned out.Kate
Winslet's
getting hitched at 23. The Academy Award-nominated Brit is going to
marry
aspiring film director Jim Theapleton, 24, according to Associated
Press. The
two met last year on the set of the forthcoming film Hideous Kinky, on
which
Theapleton served as assistant director.
"We want to get married sometime next summer," Winslet told reporters,
"but
we want to keep the details a secret."
And the way Winslet describes it, since she first laid eyes on the
filmmaker,
all those life-loving, ship-jumping, nude-sketching Jack Dawson-types
out
there never even stood a chance. Why, the first time she saw him, the
Sense
and Sensibility star said to herself, "Yep, I'll have that....When you
know
it's the right thing, you just know."
--------------- END heavenly-c.v001.n961 ---------------
Date:
Sat, 17 Oct 1998 10:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
From:
heavenly-c-errors@lists.best.comAdd to Address Book
Subject:
Digest heavenly-c.v001.n962
Reply-To:
heavenly-c@lists.best.com
To:
heavenly-c@lists.best.com
-------------- BEGIN heavenly-c.v001.n962 --------------
001 - Dopedoll <netdance@worldn - Re: Is it Just Me?
002 - Ald14hc@aol.com - Natural Born Killers - OT
003 - nbk94@xs4all.nl (jeroen) - Re: Natural Born Killers - OT
004 - ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature - Re: KW-Engagement
005 - recurring <recurring@yaho - I've made a Jude site...
006 - adam abrams <adamabr@heli - HC Links
007 - Juliana Bastos <jbastos@u - HC list members' database and The
Borovnian Archives
008 - FLiekefett@t-online.de (F - OT: Kate Winslet in waxworks?
009 - "Linzi Cottrell" <Rose.Da - Re: Kate Winslet in waxworks?
010 - StarScully@aol.com - Re: Is it Just Me?
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n962.1 ---------------
From: Dopedoll <netdance@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Is it Just Me?
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 18:14:02 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <199810162200.PAA26647@lists1.best.com>
oh..and for the confused, this is the strange and mysterious "Queen"
Jenny..i have a strange
fixation on changing my email name every five seconds.
I saw HC advertised on a video preview. It was a in late 95. I will
never for the life of me
remember exactly what video it was...but with the first glimpse of
Melanie, I knew I *had* to see
that movie. Anyway, I rented it, watched it once, and didn't know what
to think. I was completely
taken aback. I watched it a second time, and then a third, and I
believe I had watched it 4 times
before I had to return it. Then I immediately..well..2 weeks after,
went out and bought it and the
rest is very ancient history. Those video previews are amazing
things...hell, the preview on my HC
video led me to my current obsession (I don't think I could ever say
enough about this film)
Exotica.
so anyway, that is my amazingly boring story.
-J
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n962.2 ---------------
From: Ald14hc@aol.com
Subject: Natural Born Killers - OT
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 21:23:02 EDT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I know this is a bit OT - but I've noticed a few of you (Jeroen??) here
are
fans of the movie... and can help me. I am about to buy Natural Born
Killers, and wouldn't ya know they have three different ones to choose
from
(pan & scan, directors cut, and directors cut widescreen), since I've
only
seen the pan & scan version, I don't know which one to choose. Can
someone
please clearify the additions to the directors cut? THANK YOU!
~Angie
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n962.3 ---------------
From: nbk94@xs4all.nl (jeroen)
Subject: Re: Natural Born Killers - OT
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 06:22:51 GMT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
References: <199810170138.SAA15735@lists1.best.com>
In-Reply-To: <199810170138.SAA15735@lists1.best.com>
On Fri, 16 Oct 1998 21:23:02 EDT, Ald14hc@aol.com wrote:
>I know this is a bit OT - but I've noticed a few of you (Jeroen??)
here are
>fans of the movie... and can help me. I am about to buy Natural Born
>Killers, and wouldn't ya know they have three different ones to choose
from
>(pan & scan, directors cut, and directors cut widescreen), since I've
only
>seen the pan & scan version, I don't know which one to choose. Can
someone
>please clearify the additions to the directors cut? THANK YOU!
Get the director's cut, it has about 9 minutes restored back into the
movie. Imho the director's cut is a completely different film than
the rated version. The rated version is just your average summer
action flick, while the DC is much more over the top, making it more
of a satire. Also in the rated version some scenes just don't feel
right because a) you don't know exactly what's going on (for example
the scene where malorie kills scagnetti) or b) the rhythm of scenes
that were cut to music (for example the rodney king beating scene) is
completely gone because of certain shots that had to be taken out.
I have the DC on laserdisc, and it has a lot of cool extras like:
2 running commentaries by oliver stone
5 or 6 deleted scenes (the courtroom scene with ashley judd is great)
alternate ending
nine inch nails BURN music video
a documentary with cast and crew interviews.
I know there is also a DC available on vhs, and i assume it has all
these extras except for the commentary tracks. No news on a dvd yet,
although the fact that the PALMETTO dvd has a NBK trailer is probably
a good sign.
A final word on aspect ratio's. You talk about a p&s version, but
that's actually a full-frame cut. This means you actually see more
picture info in this cut than in the 1.85:1 widescreen one.
Widescreen is still better of course, and afaik the DC is only
available in widescreen.
Hope this helps.
--
Jeroen - The Netherlands - www.xs4all.nl/~nbk94
All the best people have bad chests and bone diseases.
It's all frightfully romantic! - Heavenly Creatures
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n962.4 ---------------
From: ~lyric~ <heavenlycreature@innocent.com>
Subject: Re: KW-Engagement
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 08:15:20 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <199810162200.PAA26596@lists1.best.com>
"Yep, I'll have that....When you know
it's the right thing, you just know."
Don't y'all just love that? (-:
Marloes
--
I'm so aware of where I am,
but I don't know where that is
Believe, K's Choice
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n962.5 ---------------
From: recurring <recurring@yahoo.com>
Subject: I've made a Jude site...
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 01:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi Creatures,
Anyone with a bit of time on their hands is most welcome to come and
visit my site at:
http://welcome.to/ajudesite
I'd appreciate any comments, suggestions, observations of errors,
etc.. thanks..
Jane
Also congrats to Kate on the engagement...
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n962.6 ---------------
From: adam abrams <adamabr@helix.net>
Subject: HC Links
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 02:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Just a quick note, to say I finally updated my HC links page at the 4th
World. I'm trying to make it the "ultimate HC links page" - not only by
being exhaustive but also by including some kind of commentary on as
many
of the links as I can.
There's one exception: Kate sites. Oh so very many Kate sites. Enough
already with the Kate sites. I give up on listing all of them. But
there's
a link to the site that _does_ list them all (as near as I can tell).
www.geocites.com/Hollywood/Studio/2194/faq2/Section_8/links.html
If I've missed any other (non-Kate) links (and I'm sure I probably have)
please let me know!
Adam
------------------------------------------------------------
"Before you criticize a man, you should walk a mile in his
shoes. That way, you are a mile away from him. And you've
got his shoes."
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n962.7 ---------------
From: Juliana Bastos <jbastos@usp.br>
Subject: HC list members' database and The Borovnian Archives
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 13:29:25 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Right, it's born! Me and Marloes have been working on it and now it's
finally ready. Well, it already was working last week but I wanted to
test it for a while.
The form to send your info is very simple, but it has many different
questions. Any ideas on that are very welcome, of course. All data sent
to me will be put online ASAP. And about the pictures, please send them
to me (please, not bigger than 40KB) at this email address or send a
link for me to get them. They'll be displayed at a different page, a
"members gallery" or something - I thought it would be best than put
them together with the entries, like a police file...
If you notice, the database comes inside a whole new package ;) I've
been working in my HC page for quite a long time but I didn't want to
annouce it to the list until I had most of it done. Some people here
already know it, but everybody's visit is most welcome!
The address is http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Lot/8826. Follow the
"Mailing list" link to fill in the form and send your info. Hope you
like it all!
:*
Juliana.
--
_____________________________________________________
Visit The Borovnian Archives!
http://www.geocities.com/Hollywood/Lot/8826
jbastos@usp.br
borovnia@geocities.com
ICQ #5513901
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n962.8 ---------------
From: FLiekefett@t-online.de (Frank)
Subject: OT: Kate Winslet in waxworks?
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 18:18:03 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi creatures,
according to a german program guide it is planned to erect a wax figure
of KW in
the London waxworks of Madame Tussaud. No joke, it really has been
published
here (Germany). Maybe you should take this with a grain of salt anyway.
I've
tried to translate this little article:
Lonely stature
Thanks to box office hit she has become a national heroine, to be
admired in
London waxworks of Madame Tussaud, soon. Nevertheless, "Titanic" fans
are
confused: "What about Leo DiCaprio?". Further particulars from the
manager's
office:
"One wax figur costs about 300 000 DM (approx. 187 500 US$). Therefore,
we can't
erect every person!"
Besides, Leo is not british...
Can anyone confirm or deny this?
Frank
--
'... although we may not be alone in the universe, in our own separate
ways, on this planet, we are all...alone.'
(3x20: Jose Chung's 'From Outer Space')
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n962.9 ---------------
From: "Linzi Cottrell" <Rose.Dawson@btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Kate Winslet in waxworks?
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 18:04:33 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
yep it is happening. But Leo not being british is not why they are not
doing him. They have people from all over the world. What I heard was
that
because it takes so much time and money to make a figure they have to
choose
people that will have a long 'shelf life'. i.e. be popular for a long
time!
Linzi
Titanic was called the ship of dreams - and it was, it really was.
http://www.btinternet.com/~rose.dawson
-----Original Message-----
From: Frank <FLiekefett@t-online.de>
To: heavenly-c@lists.best.com <heavenly-c@lists.best.com>
Date: 17 October 1998 17:21
Subject: OT: Kate Winslet in waxworks?
>Hi creatures,
>according to a german program guide it is planned to erect a wax
figure of
KW in
>the London waxworks of Madame Tussaud. No joke, it really has been
published
>here (Germany). Maybe you should take this with a grain of salt anyway.
I've
>tried to translate this little article:
>
>Lonely stature
>Thanks to box office hit she has become a national heroine, to be
admired
in
>London waxworks of Madame Tussaud, soon. Nevertheless, "Titanic" fans
are
>confused: "What about Leo DiCaprio?". Further particulars from the
manager's
>office:
>"One wax figur costs about 300 000 DM (approx. 187 500 US$).
Therefore, we
can't
>erect every person!"
>Besides, Leo is not british...
>
>Can anyone confirm or deny this?
>
>Frank
>
>--
>'... although we may not be alone in the universe, in our own separate
> ways, on this planet, we are all...alone.'
> (3x20: Jose Chung's 'From Outer Space')
>
>
--------------- MESSAGE heavenly-c.v001.n962.10 ---------------
From: StarScully@aol.com
Subject: Re: Is it Just Me?
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 1998 12:51:41 EDT
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<< how did you come to see HC? What led
you to it? >>
I saw the preview for it on E! when they show new movies coming out and
I also
saw it as previews at the movie. That was like 2 years ago or
something, but
I didn't get around to seeing it until last year.
*janel*
my dark victory
http://www.geocities.com/WestHollywood/Village/8279/
--------------- END heavenly-c.v001.n962 ---------------