Mathew named 2005 Research Tech of the Year
Rose Mathew, Genetics and Tumor Cell
Biology, was named the 2005 Research Tech of the Year. She was chosen from a
field of more than 250 St. Jude research technologists.
"This
has been a really big thing for me," she said. "It's special to know
that my bosses appreciate my efforts. I work with a great team."
Mathew
joined the laboratory of Martine
Roussel, PhD, and Charles Sherr, MD,
Phl), in 1997 as a senior research technologist and was promoted to laboratory
specialist in 2002. She was described by nominators as "technically
superb," "highly dedicated" and that she "generates
impeccably beautiful data even when the procedures are technically demanding
and complex."
Mathew
began her career in India where she earned degrees in botany, as well as a gold
medal for academic achievement and a state government merit scholarship from
St. Teresal College at Mahatma Gandhi University in Cochin.
Rose
has coauthored two papers and has been acknowledged in 23 other peer‑reviewed
publications. Recently she coauthored a manuscript published in Nature Structural and Molecular Biology that
represented the culmination of a collaboration with Brenda Schulman, Phl), Structural Biology.
Mathew
was instrumental in completing investigations of the biology of the E2
conjugating enzyme for the ubiquitin‑like molecule, Nedd8. She cloned
this E2, called UBC12, in a genetic screen several years ago and then
characterized mutants and performed biologic assays that were critical to Schulman's
studies. Roussel and SherT agree that "Rose is what every investigator
hopes to find‑a gem and a simply outstanding performer! "
Mathew was presented with a
certificate and two round‑trip airline tickets. The Research Tech of the
Year runners‑up are Rashid
Abdulle, Molecular Pharmacology, and James
Ynowles, Hematology‑Oncology. Other finalists include Twala Hogg, Developmental
Neurobiology; Jennifer Moore, Pathology;
Melissa Mann, Genetics and Tumor Cell Biology; and Christina Guibao, Structural Biology. Each employee received a
certificate and token of appreciation. Nominations were based on one's
contributions to research, team work, reliability, work attitude and volunteer
work, among other considerations. A faculty panel assessed the candidates based
on these criteria.