The
Oldest Genealogy
Why are there discrepancies with the Genealogies
from Matthew & Luke? Matthew begins with Abraham and traces Jesus'
lineage to Joseph, Mary's husband. But Luke, on the other hand, begins
with Joseph and traces Jesus' lineage back to Adam.
Why? Commentators have stressed that Matthew was a Jew; he was writing
his gospel primarily for Jews. But Luke, a Greek, was primarily writing
his gospel for the Gentiles. Therefore, he wanted to establish that Jesus'
ancestry runs all the way back to Adam, the father of the human race. This
qualified Christ to lawfully represent the human race that He came to redeem.
Why are the names that Matthew lists for the period from David to Joseph
different from the names Luke gives? One explanation is that Matthew and
Luke are tracing Jesus' ancestry through two different lines. Matthew clearly
follows the ruling line of the royal family
from David to the Babylonian Captivity. Luke, on the other hand, seems
to follow a non- ruling or blood line of the
family back to Nathan; another son of David by Bathsheba. So Mary, who
was born from the line of Nathan, and Joseph, through the line of Solomon,
were engaged to be married. Joseph and Mary could intermarry because they
had passed the fourteen generations which were required by the Jewish law.
The Jews were very careful to maintain genealogical records which were
preserved in the temple until its destruction in A.D. 70. When Jesus offered
Himself to Israel as the Messiah, His claim to David's throne was never
challenged. Even though the nation of Israel rejected Him, it was not because
He was outside the line of David, and therefore, ineligible to claim David's
throne. Even though Mary, through her lineage, was of the Davidic bloodline,
she should be excluded from being able to pass those rights of the bloodline
because of being a female (Deut 21:16). She should be disqualified to transfer
the rights to her son Jesus, except for a little known exception to the
rule. In Numbers 26; Zelophehad had no sons, only daughters. In Numbers
27, following his death, the daughters of Zelophehad came before Moses
and argued their plight. Because their father had died with no sons, all
of their rights of inheritance were to be lost and they felt this was unfair.
So Moses prayed to God and God gave Moses an exception to the rule. The
Lord told Moses that the inheritance CAN flow through a female, IF they
fulfill two requirements. There must be no male offspring in the family
(Num 27:8) and if the female offspring should marry, they must marry within
their own tribe (Num 36:6). We find that Mary had no brothers, and Mary
did indeed marry within her own tribe (JUDAH) to Joseph. What an awesome
God that set the requirements to allow the virgin birth to take place 1,400
years in advance! Why is there no genealogy included in Mark and John?
Through Mark, the Roman readers would not consider the genealogy of Jesus
Christ as an important factor. All they were concerned with were the great
works of Jesus that showed Him to be the Son of God. John was writing primarily
to the Greeks. So he goes back into the eternities and relates Jesus as
God. The Old Testament contains many genealogies, four long ones in Genesis
alone. To the ancient Hebrew, lineage was crucial. If your veins held even
a trace of foreign blood, you would lose your right to call yourself a
Jew. Herod the Great was despised by Jews because he was half Edomite.
Consequently, he had the official records destroyed so that no one could
produce a purer pedigree than his own. He was not a "complete" Jew, so
he destroyed all the records. Matthew gives the names of four women in
the list. This was contrary to Jewish custom. And three of these women
were also guilty of gross sin, and two of them were foreigners. Matthew
6 emphasizes Bathsheba: "David was the father of Solomon whose mother had
been Uriah's wife," not David's wife, underlining the sinfulness of that
link in the lineage. This tells us that not only was Jesus born for sinners,
Jesus was also born through sinners. A message that spells hope for you
and me. This is a constant theme for Matthew, for Jesus came not to call
the righteous, but He came to call the sinners (Matthew 9:13). The truth
is that Jesus did not come just to be born, but rather to die for the sins
of the world. The Bible declares that God demanded an adequate, perfect
sacrifice for sins. Since man in his sinful state was incapable of providing
such a sacrifice, God in His love and wisdom provided His own sacrifice
in the perfect person of His Son, Jesus Christ.
In Matthew we have- BEGAT, BEGAT until we
come to Jesus.
In Luke we have the SON of, the SON of,
until we come to Jesus.
Matthew says Joseph's father was named
Jacob. (begat)
But Luke says Joseph's father was named
Heli \ Eli (son ?) .....
When genealogies were traced, women were
not included except
with the word- BY. In this case, Heli
was the father of Mary.
Luke replaced HER NAME WITH "supposedly,
the son of Joseph."
Jesus was Joseph's LEGAL son, meaning:
Jesus had the Legal right to be the King
of the Jews.
Why did Jesus not have the curse on Him
from Jeconiah?
Jesus was NOT a Physical Descendant of
Jeconiah.
Jesus was a Physical Descendant of David
through His mother.
BACK
TO MY GENEALOGY HOMEPAGE