Medical marketPrintable version

Sun-Times home Sun-Times Sections
News
Sports
Business
Showcase
Columnists
Classifieds
Search the Sun-Times
Ameritech Yellow Pages


gray arrow Health News
gray arrow Insurance
Q & A


gray arrow Architecture
gray arrow Autos
gray arrow Commentary
gray arrow Health
gray arrow Lottery Numbers
gray arrow Obituaries
gray arrow World News Wire










Foreskin removal may slow HIV spread

June 10, 2000

BY ANDRE PICARD TORONTO GLOBE AND MAIL

Circumcision is such an effective means of reducing the risk of HIV transmission that a worldwide program to circumcise teenage boys should be undertaken to slow the AIDS epidemic, Australian researchers say.

Those conclusions are largely based on African studies, where most HIV transmission is through heterosexual contact. It is not known how circumcision affects the rate of HIV infection among homosexuals.

"In light of the evidence . . . circumcising males seems highly desirable, especially in countries with a high prevalence of HIV infection," Dr. Roger Short, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Melbourne, said in Friday's edition of the British Medical Journal.

"Circumcision at puberty, as practiced by many Muslim communities, would be the most immediately effective intervention for reducing HIV transmission since it would be done before young men are likely to become sexually active," he writes.

Short said neonatal circumcision should be practiced more widely, but that approach would take 15 to 20 years to affect HIV-AIDS rates.

A review of medical literature by the Australian team revealed that circumcised men are less likely to contract HIV-AIDS during unprotected sex. Their rates of contracting other sexually transmitted diseases also are markedly lower.

The most dramatic evidence of the protective effects of circumcision was published earlier this year in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Researchers tracking hundreds of Ugandan couples, in which one partner was infected and the other not, reported that there was not a single new infection in the group with circumcised males. In the group with uncircumcised males, however, the new infection rate was 29 percent over a 30-month period.

Uncircumcised men are particularly susceptible because, during intercourse, the foreskin is pulled down the shaft of the penis, "and the whole inner surface of the foreskin is exposed to vaginal secretions, providing a large area where HIV transmission could take place," according to the study.

The only "exposed" area of a circumcised penis is the urethral opening.



Back to top Back to Health

 
   




[News] [Sports] [Business] [Showcase] [Classifieds] [Columnists] [Feedback] [Home]

Copyright 2000, Digital Chicago Inc.