| LINKS |
I'm Mark van Roojen, a professor of philosophy at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. I mainly teach and publish in the areas of ethics, metaethics and political philosophy. In May and June of 2008 I'll be visiting at the Institute for Advanced Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem in connection with the Seminar in Moral Psychology, Moral Motivation and Moral Realism organized by David Enoch and I'll be giving a paper at the related Conference on Metaethics, etc. on June 18-20. MetaethicsMost of my publications have been on metaethics, a reasonably abstract subfield of ethics having to do with issues surrounding the nature of moral judgements and properties. If you want a label, my current views in metaethics are a version of cognitivist anti-Humean rationalism. Unless you're up on metaethics yourself, this probably doesn't mean much to you. I'm not sure what I can say here to help, but if you want to do some reading in metaethics check out Jimmy Lenman's web-based metaethics bibliography. For a sample of something in metaethics that is supposed to be more accessible to a general audience I have an entry about non-cognitivism in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-cognitivism/ . It was posted there in January of 2004 and revised recently. As with many narratives, the first version of the entry was a bit more unified than the current version which was revised in light of recent developments. If I were writing it from scratch today it might have a different emphasis and structure because of this.
Normative Ethics and Political PhilosophyWithin normative ethics I am quite interested in the debates between consequentialists and non-consequentialists and in particular in the best ways to defend non-consequentialism. The paper on satisficing and maximizing that is in the Byron volume by Cambridge University Press ( pdf here) summarized at abstracts page probably is the best example of my work on such issues. In political philosophy I am most interested in issues of distributive justice, though I am also trying to get a handle on democratic theory. Published WorkIf you are interested in any of this, you can check out the abstracts of my published work which include links to pdfs of most of the articles.Recent and Current WorkAs for stuff I'm still working on, I have a paper on moral rationalism and rational amoralism that I've been working on for several (nine!?!) years and that I'm now reading around. It is about the ways in which a moral rationalist account of ethics can handle the idea that rational people may act immorally or amorally. One of the things I like about it is some discussion of the interaction between Frege's Puzzle and Internalism about moral judgements. I've just (in Feb 2009) finished a new draft which will hopefully be about what the final version winds up looking like. I've had a lot of useful help on it from people who've read it and given me comments. I also have a paper I've been working on that argues that a Rawlsian Conception of Justice according to which the smallest representative share of social goods should be as great as possible is in fact required by the proper understanding of our prima facie duty not to harm other people. A version of that is now out in Acta Analytica, but I have a longer version of it that can be downloaded from the page below. You can find PDFs of both papers on my As Yet Unpublished Papers page for your reading pleasure. |
© 2000 msv@unlserve.unl.edu
Get your own Free Home Page
My Timberframe Cabin Page.