Filaria in Guyana a historical and current perspective

Lloyd Validum MD. Malariologist.

There may be few persons in Guyana today who have not at some time in the past made reference to someone "having big foot"to describe that well known tropical disease,Lymphatic Filariasis.Even though not as evident as malaria,Bancroftian Filariasis is still prevalent in Guyana today,the extent of which is yet to be properly determined. Caused by Wuchereria bancrofti a nematode filarialworm,filaria has a preference for the lymphatic system.The disease can cause a myriad of symptoms ranging from mild to severe in intensity.The first commonly recognizable sign is usually a small painful swelling in the groin (lymphadenitis),with a line of inflamed area leading down the postero-medial(inner) side of the leg to the inner side of the ankle("inflamed vein" as put by most patients). Among other common forms of presentation are hydrocele,lymphangitis,abscesses and

eventually the classical "big foot". ( Below Case of Eliphantitis as a result of lymphatic filariasis Guyana 1998)

Case of Gross deformity  In Eliphantiasis ( pic L Validum 1999)

Filaria was first reported in the colony of British Guiana in 1877 by one Hillis. Subsequently much work was carried out on the subject.It was already known that the disease was transmitted from a sick person to a healthy one by the bite of a mosquito,and the one responsible for the local transmission of the disease was found to be the Culex fatigans (quinquefaciatus).

The mosquito bred in a wide variety of habitats from storage containers for drinking water, to flooded pit latrines, septic tank overflows,and sewers.The insect in this setting is a domestic creature quite suited to maintaining the transmission of the disease within the community. Knowing all of this,it was not however uncommon for there to be the stigma of"a big foot family" to be attached to any family who had a "big foot granny" in the home.Inheritance was definite in the minds if many.As a matter of fact quite a few other household myths may have sprung from the presence of the disease.Giglioli noted in 1960 that it was commonly thought that repeated successive exposure to heat then cold was particularly dreaded by some as being the cause of filarial attacks, thus in those days a maid who had been cooking or ironing could not be made to open a refrigerator for fear of causing a filarial attack.

There is really no definite conclusion as to the how filaria originally came to our shores,though various opinions are voiced about the probable importation with different batches of immigrants to the colony. However quite a bit of emphasis was placed on studying the distribution of the disease by various parameters such as ethnic groups,sex,age, place of residence, sanitary conditions and place of work.

 

The most consistent findings indicated that there was definitely a link between incidence of filaria and poor living conditions which led to high mosquito populations and human overcrowding. Studies suggested that filaria seemed to be on the increase since the previous century,with an all high rate of 30.5 percent being recorded in a city survey during 1921 by Anderson (515 persons examined).It was also noted that different ethnic groups possessed different susceptibility and response to the disease.

The geographical distribution of the disease seemed to be all along the coastal,but more heavily concentrated in the highly populated centers than in the rural estates.New Amsterdam was not to be spared and the mental hospital was because of the long term nature of its patients,a focus for repeated study of the disease The disease was and is a difficult one to study.This is mainly due to its nocturnal periodicity in appearing in the peripheral bloodstream where in can be detected,usually in the early hours of the morning. Furthermore once contracted there may be an incubation period(hidden development) within the person for almost two years before it becomes evident that filaria is present,usually with the appearance of one of the symptoms mentioned before.What may be surprising to many is that a large number of persons testing positive for the disease do not have any symptoms,while persons with symptoms frustratingly are less often test positive.

 

The main areas of the city mentioned in previous studies on filaria are Alberttown,Lodge,Kitty,Newtown,and La Penitance,while on the coast Buxton,Plantation Lusignan,Cane Grove and New Amsterdam were the most studied.Between 1924 and 1953 a series of events aided the reduction of transmission of the disease in these areas.In 1947 studies in the same area of Georgetown as studied by Anderson in 1927,showed a prevalence rate of only 12.6 percent compared with the 30.5 percent found previously.

This apparent reduction in the disease can probably be attributed to a combination of various factors.

a)In Georgetown the introduction of a sewage system between 1924 to 1936 caused the reduction of the number of breeding sites available there,the subsequent decrease in number of mosquitoes resulted in a comparable decrease in incidence of filaria in these areas. In the suburbs the sanitary situation improved somewhat with better housing and on the plantations the range or barrack type of family lodging were slowly being replaced by housing schemes,where workers were afforded house lots of 1/10 acre and long term soft loans to build houses which became the property of the workers once the loans were repaid.

b)The Yellow fever control service was started in Georgetown in 1939. The program though focussed on the Aedes aegypti mosquito,did help to reduce the incidence of Culex mosquitoes in the sewers areas of the city ,in the suburbs however the continued presence of pit latrines made things a bit more difficult .

c)Treatment of cases with diethylcarbamazine (DEC,popularly known as "banocide" still the main drug in use today).

d)The effect of the residual spraying of DDT intended to control malaria also present.Anopheles darlingi the targeted malaria vector,(Mosquito which transmitted malaria) was also capable of transmitting filaria.The elimination of this insect and the curtailment of the population of the Culex mosquito population along the coast during the 5 to 6 years of the spraying operations,seems to be of the greatest importance of these factors in the overall reduction in incidence of filaria.

It is important to note that filaria much like malaria, typhoid and cholera are community dependent and are sometimes termed diseases of poverty or underdevelopment. Adequate conditions can also be created by unplanned or misguided settlement of populations in housing projects without adequate sanitation perplexing for the site,for example as in the case of squatting settlements.

During the last thirty or so years the limits of the city of Georgetown has expanded considerably.Additions of the Ruimveldts and movement of people from the rural areas to Georgetown and its environs,has increased the population exposed to the disease.In fact recent data suggest that the prevalence of filariasis is on the increase.What is evident is that due to the long period of it's evolution,the disease is usually not recognized until entering it's chronic stage.T

he disease usually only dramatic during the flare-ups may well have been overlooked by many a physician unacquainted with it's history in Gyuana.Furthermore alternative diagnoses and blind use of antibiotics or other drugs may have contributed to the insidious increase of filaria over the years..

Some of the areas which within the last two years have been shown to harbor a filaria problem,are exemplified by the following localities from which cases have been detected, In Georgetown; Wortmanville,Riumveldt(all sections),Lodge (historically a problem area),Kingston,Alberttown,Kitty, Cambleville,La Penitance,Prashad Nagar,Werkenrust, and not the least Charlestown. On the East Coast of Demarara; Victoria,Buxton,Mahaica,and annandale figure the most While on the East Bank of Demarara Agricola,Grove and Friendship are notable areas. Evident however is that diagnosis and treatment of the individual cases will certainly not eliminate the disease from the community .A better and permanent approach will be to pursue an environmental management program,which will eliminate the conditions favoring filaria and other mosquito borne disease transmission.

This is by no means an easy task, but a necessary one if we are to avoid stop-gaping whenever an epidemic rears it's ugly head.As start it would be very beneficial for there to be greater interaction between housing community development authorities and relevant areas of the public health system In wrapping up this brief summary of a topic which can consume much more time ,it is not with the intention of alarming the reader that we should mention that two other species of filaria can be found in Guyana.They are however generally restricted to interior locations,and are considered non-pathogenic (not necessarily harmful to the infected person).A third species found in a neighboring country has not been detected in Guyana to date.

References;

1960 Giglioli G,Beadnell H.H.S.G. Filariasis in British Guiana some industrial medical problems .Indian Journal of Malariology 14 4 December 1960

1948 Giglioli G Malaria Filariasis and Yellow Fever in British Guiana Mosquito Control Service Medical Department British Guiana

1990 Nathan M.B ,Stroom V Prevalence of Wuchereria bancrofti in Georgetown Guyana Bulletin of PAHO 24(3) 1990

1989,1990 Annual reports of the Vector Control Service Ministry of Health.