PHYSICS STUDENTS
$2,000
CASH PRIZE
The simple illustrations below (Figures A, B, and C) prove that either the laws of light propagation are wrong or the nature of light is more complex than has been assumed and an oversight has taken place concerning the affect of an observer's motion on the appearance of simultaneous events.
A $2,000 cash prize will be awarded to anyone who can provide an explanation for the laboratory findings summarized in these illustrations that does not contradict either relativity theory or the laws of physics.
One prize only: First correct proof submitted
(postmark or e-mail date).
The pages on this website have been
extremely slow to download. This problem is being investigated.
Sorry for this inconvenience.
|
- FIGURE A: Summarizes the laboratory findings of Michelson-Morley concerning the propagation of light.
- FIGURE B: Summarizes the laboratory findings from moving light sources concerning the propagation of light.
- FIGURE C: Runs the experiments in Figures A and B together in a single experiment.
|
