Rushmore

Reviewed by: KateWrath

February 11, 1999

Return

Re: Rushmore.... huh. As bad as films can be (and I went to "She's All That"--don't ask why--so I know whereof I speak), I feel ashamed of myself for having problems with Rushmore, which tries like hell to do something admirable. But yeah, it left me dissatisfied. Entertained, yes, but dissatisfied...Max grows up, but I'm just not sure why I was invited to watch this process unfold.

But as to Max's personal flaws...well, he's 15, he deserves a little slack. He's a Ferris Bueller who actually has to deal with the consequences of his actions, and for that, I admire the script (although how he gets away with so much does remain a mystery to me.) Reading Edelstein's reviews, though, I'm astonished at the lack of slack he cuts others. I'm not talking about his criticism of Anderson--that's all well and good--but his dislike for a 15-year-old kid, a "hustler." What is that? There's no sign (that I could see) that Max pursues things for material gain. It's just that he believes he's capable of anything, and hasn't yet realized he isn't. (And if there's any truer observation about adolescence, I don't know what it is.)